ONTD Political

shock-me-gray, bored, apathy
chantalzola 14th-Nov-2012 05:21 am (UTC)
Their testimony seems to be a bit different though. Also that he had been a teacher at that place for 20 years. I don't know, the brief and other stuff I have read lead me to beleive this article is very sensationlist and that there are some valid reasons as to why a lawyer would take his case to the supreme court.

I also find his deliberately branding to be suspect. It seems like an accident. The fact that only one kid has come forward in 20 years seems like he's been doing a really dumb, dangerous experiement that he shouldn't be doing, but that he's not going willy nilly branding children. Also, where are the photos of all of those kids being branded? I just don't believe it.

I am not on this teacher's side, but I do think this article is misleading.

eta: for what it's worth, I do think it looks like a cross. But was that the teacher's intent?
Reply Form 

No HTML allowed in subject

  
 
   
 

Notice! This user has turned on the option that logs your IP address when posting. 

(will be screened)

This page was loaded Jul 11th 2014, 5:49 am GMT.