I've read several election postmortems that claim Mitt Romney paid a whole lot more for his TV ads than Barack Obama did. Today, Matt Lewis confirms this. His source tells him that Romney typically paid a big premium for non-preemptable ads even in early September, when ads are rarely preempted. Why?
According to our source, Team Obama simply did the “due diligence to find where the lowest unit rate was,” a tedious process which “takes manpower.” Conversely, it appears Team Romney simply didn’t want bother with the hassle. So they threw money at the problem — and walked away.
In other words, Obama ran his campaign like a business, outsourcing specialized tasks like media buys to outside firms and keeping a tight rein on costs. Conversely, Romney ran his campaign like a millionaire's personal fiefdom, figuring that his buddies could do the job as well as anyone else. But although they were pretty deft at making excuses for their inefficiency, it turned out they couldn't. What's more, outside the world of TV ads, he directed a tremendous amount of campaign money to his friends:
Mitt Romney's campaign has directed $134.2 million to political firms with business ties to his senior staff, spotlighting the tightknit nature of his second presidential bid and the staggering sums being spent in this election....Ryan Williams, a Romney spokesman, said payments to firms with connections to staff members were not only for consulting, but also were used to purchase a variety of services, including "polling, video production, political mail, get-out-the-vote phones, online advertising, website development, and budget and compliance management, among other things."
His longtime business cronies did well out of the campaign, but Romney apparently didn't know how to manage them very well (cf. Orca, failure of). This isn't surprising. Romney portrays himself as a successful manager, but there's a big difference between heading up a private equity firm and heading up an actual business. Live and learn.
jesus.
[I suppose, technically, money can hire you brains, but you have to have enough brains to choose good brains to hire, and that appears to be lacking]
Thank GOD the American people cannot be duped. Well, 52%, give or take a decimal point...
(On the other hand, the Scarecrow was a smart enough ruler to know he was crap at ruling a country and happy to step down and let a girl run things. And off course, the Wizard was also smart enough to know he was a humbug, and he skipped town before everybody started to call shenanigans. And he actually did stimulate the economy, come to think of it. . . . which means they were both smarter than Romney.)
Edited at 2012-11-20 11:10 pm (UTC)
Wait. I know! Princess Langwidere! He kept on changing heads (and personalities to match) depending on who he wanted to be that day.
Wow, it's been far too long since I read Wizard of Oz. Should fix that.
I think Dorothy and the Wizard in Oz (book 4) has the creepiest characters of all. At least, I got totally creeped out by the vegetable people. But, totally read the books! You know they were removed from lots of library shelves in the 50s because people thought they were too communist? And really, light-hearted jabs at suffragists asides, Oz is a utopian matriarchal society. It's awesome. ;D (Far from unproblematic -- and there's a paper or two I still need to write there -- but awesome.)
Edited at 2012-11-20 11:46 pm (UTC)
BTW, I've always loved that otter icon.
Edited at 2012-11-20 11:49 pm (UTC)
My mind just literally went [blank] when I read that. Does not compute.
And a collective sigh of relief was heard around the world...
Also lawl Romney
*digs around the internet for sources*