ONTD Political

Do we have the right to pardon Alan Turing?

2:40 pm - 12/14/2012
Background: Stehpen Hawking and other top scientists have written an open letter to the government saying that Alan Turing should be pardoned of that crime for which he was convicted in 1952 - homosexuality.

Stephen Hawking and a number of his peers have signed a letter that appears in the Telegraph today, calling for the government to pardon the legendary mathematician and computer scientist, Alan Turing. Turing, a major force in cracking the German naval Enigma code, was charged with gross indecency in 1952 for the crime of committing homosexual acts, ejected from GCHQ and subjected to a hormone 'treatment' – chemical castration – that left him impotent. The father of computer science died two years later aged just 41. Although he received a formal apology from Gordon Brown in 2009, a petition calling for a pardon was denied earlier this year.

"…successive governments seem incapable of forgiving his conviction for the then crime of being a homosexual," the letter argues. "We urge the prime minister to exercise his authority and formally forgive the iconic British hero."

Pardoning Turing is one of those ideas that seem so obviously right it's scarcely worth giving them a second thought. He was a hero and genius whose life was ruined by the state's bigotry and prejudice, and no one in their right mind would suggest that he deserves anything less than a full pardon and a grovelling apology. And yet while I'd like to see it happen, there are at least three questions I can think of that are worth a bit of thought.

The first, and most obvious: why only Turing? Tens of thousands of people were convicted under the same law, dating back to Oscar Wilde and earlier. All of them people were victims of the same injustice, and the scale of that injustice was the same whatever their achievements, whether they happened to be Alan the mathematician or Bill the coal-miner. Addressing this only for those who happened to be public heroes is a shallow, insincere and grossly unfair act that just compounds the problem – pardon all of them, or pardon none, but don't imply through your actions that some are more 'deserving' of 'forgiveness' than others.

Second: why do it at all? It's difficult to see what pardoning Turing would really achieve, for him or for the cause of equality more generally. The man himself won't know much about it: even if heaven existed it's doubtful they would let something as vile and depressing as The News in, and of course if the Christians are right he won't be in heaven anyway. We cannot 'make it up' to him: the damage inflicted on his mind, body and career cannot ever be undone.

On the other hand his legacy is unquestioned, and his reputation as one of the great British heroes is secure. His conviction has entered history as a stain not on his character, but on Britain itself; an important reminder for future generations of what we did, and what we mustn't do again. Perhaps this is unfair on my part, but the conspicuous political act of publicly expunging that stain – as if it would somehow 'undo' the crime – feels uncomfortably like a self-serving gesture, a way of drawing a line under an embarrassing period in our history and moving on as though everything were fixed. The trouble is I'm not entirely convinced we should move on.

Which brings me to my third question: who would pardon him? David Cameron? On behalf of the British government? We live in a country that gives political power to a church riddled with bigotry, where the battle for marriage equality is still being fought, and where homophobic bullying is endemic in our schools. We have entire sections of industry – notably Premier League football – in which no gay man can reveal himself for fear of what might happen. Our dominant political party is riddled withmembers making homophobic statements, and in Cabinet we have both a chancellor who referred to a gay MP as a "pantomime dame" and a Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice who claimed that it's acceptable for B&Bs to turn away gay couples.

I could run through examples like this all week, but the point is this: I'm not sure that the British government have earned the right to pardonAlan Turing. Not as long as the attitudes that led to his persecution are still very much with us, and entrenched in that very same government.

The language of Hawking et al's letter is remarkably clumsy; its plea that the government should 'forgive' Turing carelessly implying that he did something to be forgiven for. In reality, it is the government who should be seeking forgiveness from Alan Turing, but that of course has been impossible for more than half a century, and no amount of symbolic gestures will change matters. A pardon for Turing and his peers would be welcome, but if politicians are serious about atoning for past sins then they should ask what they can do for homosexuals today. There's no shortage of places for them to start.

I found this a really interesting article. I'm not going to hold my breath in expectation that the government will do anything, but I also don't think their inaction will be due to the points raised in this article.

metanoiame 14th-Dec-2012 06:13 pm (UTC)
A really interesting and thoughtful piece. I definitely agree, the whole idea for being "forgiven" for being gay is pretty back-asswards.
a_phoenixdragon 14th-Dec-2012 07:52 pm (UTC)
Those last two-three paragraphs. Hear, hear! All they'd be doing is saying 'ohh, see how open minded we are?' when in reality, none of our governments are that damned open-minded. What happened to Turing was offensive and beyond cruel. He saved the whole damned world. Then he was publicly shamed. Castrated. And left to die in prison, where he killed himself. What a fucking thank you. Shame on THEM. And if only they could go back and change history and ask HIS forgiveness, they'd have to thank him in turn for the ability - he accelerated our abilities by centuries. The world has a lot to ask forgiveness of him for.
oudeteron 14th-Dec-2012 10:29 pm (UTC)
This article is good. The conundrum is, as has already been pointed out, that the current government's likely inaction won't be motivated by any of these important points. Worse, from the institutional perspective, the "progressive" (and I hate that it needs to be called progressive to just accord a queer person their basic humanity) thing to do would be to comply with that letter. I say worse here because even if they did issue the pardon, it wouldn't address any of the problems in this whole patronizing "forgiveness" concept at all.

But, yes, never mind any once and future governments, Turing was an out-of-this-world badass who would most significantly have benefited from not being treated to a state-sanctioned murder. There's nothing Cameron or anyone else in power can do to atone for that. (And the idea that maybe Cameron would do it and use this pardon as a publicity move to rack up some popularity outside of his pet circles? Actually makes me sick to contemplate.)
fluteaphrael 14th-Dec-2012 10:55 pm (UTC)
I think that there needs to be not pardons (which say "you were guilty, but we're forgiving you,") but whatever the British equivalent of reversing the sentences is. Particularly since people who were convicted of this "crime" are still alive. And it needs to be an across the board "we were wrong to criminalise this, and everyone who was "convicted" of this will have their convictions completely expunged."

eta to close a quotation

Edited at 2012-12-14 10:57 pm (UTC)
This page was loaded Mar 28th 2017, 12:38 am GMT.