Right-wing parliamentarian was challenged for using the term to disparage actress Mila Kunis

The Ukrainian Justice Ministry has ruled that using the derogatory term “zhyd” to describe a Jew is legal, turning back a petition demanding that the word be banned from the public sphere for being offensive to the county’s Jewish population.
According to reports Wednesday in the Ukrainian media, Eleanor Grossman, the editor of the “Jewish Kiev” website, had appealed to the ministry to block right-wing nationalists from using the term, whose equivalent is pronounced “yid” in English.
The ministry wrote in its response that, after looking into the matter, it had found no prohibition against using the word, or its feminine derivative “zhydovka,” although it did point out that in official government communications, the word “Jew” should be used.
The decision cited a Ukrainian academic dictionary to the effect that the term “zhyd” is an archaic term for Jew, and isn’t necessarily a slur.
In November 2011, Grossman asked representatives of Ukraine’s nationalist Svoboda party to stop using the phrase Grossman made her appeal after Svoboda deputy leader and parliament member Igor Miroshnichenko launched a tirade against Mila Kunis in which he wrote that the Ukraine-born Jewish American actress ”is not Ukrainian but a zhydovka.”
Svoboda has repeatedly said it will not stop using terms that, it claims, are legitimate Ukrainian parlance.
Source
And using decontextualized dictionary definitions to "prove" something is such a staple of bigoted demagogy I can't even.
Zhyd is Polish, too.
http://en.bab.la/dictionary/polish-engl
Also, I slightly freaked out for a second when I seen "Svoboda" I thought it was my last name at first and I was like eww, dnw anymore, but nm. :3
The decision cited a Ukrainian academic dictionary to the effect that the term “zhyd” is an archaic term for Jew, and isn’t necessarily a slur.
If people are using the term to insult Jewish people, then it's obviously a slur. It's not that hard.
God, I love that movie.they're delusional
And by nice I mean get your shit together, _p.
highlights:
Edited at 2012-12-21 06:05 am (UTC)
Sob.
I got the gist of the main article, but think there was something I missed. But I think the article and the comments are worth a read.
Here's an article by the Daily Mail (I know!) as well: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/ar
Edited at 2012-12-21 07:59 am (UTC)
They were also discriminated against by the soviets, but their attitude to religion is probably well known. Despite that Jewish was listed as a race on soviet documents. The Ukraine has a fairly large Jewish population too before WWII, in which 15% of the Ukrainian population where killed. The Jewish population in the Ukraine is now still the 5th largest in Europe although so many were killed. Just as many other parts of Europe anti-Semitism and fascism is on the rise, where there are more Jewish people this is more apparent than elsewhere where less Jewish people survived (or so it seems to me, just because i have lived where fascism is on the rise but people don't talk about it). The Ukraine is not special in having an anti-Semitic party and a history of deeply entrenched anti-Semitism, it's all over Europe.
Edited at 2012-12-21 11:44 am (UTC)
_p is bumming me out a lot lately. We missed a chance to have a meaningful conversation/listen (shit the standard not talking because it's not an U.S./Canadian/U.K. post would have been better in this case) because of some really messed up bullshit (that's still ongoing).
I love the articles posted here, but we've gotten an extra number of people coming in posts being assholes in the last year. I can't imagine anyone of a marginalized group (of the many represented here) being thrilled to engage assholes that continually come in and shit all over everything.
This is why every time we have a post on issues I see people from those communities rolling their eyes and walking out of posts and ranting their frustrations out other places.
This shit is not okay and I'm sure tons of folks are just exhausted by now.
This post right here? This is why people don't try to educate folks.
In and of itself the word shouldn't be a slur, but it's the fact that it's almost always used in a negative context. As in the example of this guy from an anti-Semitic party saying she's not Ukrainian, because she's Jewish. Now I rephrased that to be an adjective, but think of it as a noun and you get the picture of what the Jewish people in the Ukraine are objecting to with this guy's language. The Ukrainian dictionary definition will probably show that it's not a slur, I don't know for sure, but it probably doesn't show it as a slur, and I hope my example clears up why before the poster from above goes to google and tries to bring that argument (of course, maybe they've already been banned, I can't tell).
openly admires the World War II pro- Nazi Ukrainian Insurgent Army,
And my source and a lot of jewish sources SAY THAT IS A SLUR.
and as for the first thread... i feel like those people should know better, especially after looking it up on wikipedia. the text this one Croatian person is quoting from wikipedia to justify their point is like... actually saying that it is considered a slur in some places (like Slovenia) and not in others. like. it varies. so, surely having read that they think the Jewish people of Ukraine might not be getting upset about nothing? -_- what is the point of looking things up on wikipedia if you are just going to ignore that the text there says?
...oh God...
...*braces self for fail*
:/