ONTD Political

Let’s Ask How We Contribute To Rape

3:47 pm - 01/04/2013

As I write this, there are protests going on all over Delhi, and in other parts of the country, against the gang-rape of a young woman on a moving bus a few days ago in the city. People are out there in large numbers — young, old, male, female, rich, poor — and they’re angry. They want the rapists to be caught, they want them to be taught a lesson, many are suggesting they should be hanged, or castrated, but also that the State should act, bring in effective laws, fast track courts, police procedures and more. Not since the Mathura rape case have there been such widespread protests. The difference is that then, it was mainly women’s groups who were protesting; today’s protests are more diverse. Sometimes, tragically, it takes a case like this to awaken public consciousness, to make people realise that rape and sexual assault are not merely ‘women’s issues,’ they’re a symbol of the deep-seated violence that women — and other marginalised people — experience every day in our society.

At a time when every politician, no matter what colour, is crying foul, every judge and lawyer, no matter what their loyalties, is joining the chorus, every policeperson, no matter from where, is adding his/her voice, it is worth remembering some key things. First, more than 90 per cent of rapes are committed by people known to the victim/survivor, a staggering number of rapists are family members. When we demand the death penalty, do we mean therefore that we should kill large numbers of uncles, fathers, brothers, husbands, neighbours? How many of us would even report cases of rape then? What we’re seeing now — the slow, painful increase in even reports being filed — will all disappear. Second, the death penalty has never been a deterrent against anything — where, for example, is the evidence that death penalties have reduced the incidence of murders? Quite apart from the fact that the State should never be given the right to take life, there is an argument to be made that imposing the death penalty will further reduce the rate of conviction, as no judge will award it.

Then, and this is something that women’s groups grasped long ago: a large number of rapes are committed in custody, many of these by the police. Mathura was raped by two policemen, Rameezabee was raped inside a police station by police personnel, Suman Rani was raped by policemen. There are countless other cases: will we hang all police rapists? Put together, that’s a lot of people to hang.

Police action is, in fact, one of the demands. Yet, the police’s record, whether in recording cases or in conducting investigations, is nothing to write home about. On a recent television show, a police officer put his finger on it when he said: how can we expect that police personnel, who are, after all, made of the same stuff as the men who gang-raped the young woman last week, to suddenly and miraculously behave differently? I was reminded of a study done by a local newsmagazine not so long ago of the attitudes of high ranking police officers in Delhi about rape. Roughly 90 per cent of them felt the woman deserved it, that she asked for it, that she should not have been out alone, or should not have been dressed in a particular fashion. Strange that women’s bodies should invite such reactions — could it be that the problem is in the eye of the beholder? Why, for example, does it seem to be more ‘legitimate’ for women to be out during daylight hours, but not at night?

Lawyers and judges too have joined the protests — and this is all to the good for the more diverse the protests, the more impact they will have. But it’s lawyers who use every ruse in the book to allow rapists to get away, judges who make concessions because the rapists are ‘young men who have their whole lives in front of them’ and so on. Do women’s lives not have a value then?

And then there are our politicians. Perhaps we need to ask how many politicians have rape cases, or allegations of rape pending against them. Perhaps we need to ask why no one is asking this question: that here you have an elected politician, your next prime ministerial candidate, someone under whose rule Muslim women in Gujarat were not only subjected to horrendous rape but also to equally dreadful violence. How can we, how can the media, how can journalists — all of whom are lauding the success of this politician, how can they not raise, and particularly at this time, the question of his sanctioning, encouraging the use of rape as a weapon of war? And more, we need to ask: if the politicians are indeed serious about this issue, why are they not out there with the protestors? When Anna Hazare was fasting, there wasn’t a day that went by when one or other politician did not go to see him. Where are they now?

Rape happens everywhere: it happens inside homes, in families, in neighbourhoods, in police stations, in towns and cities, in villages, and its incidence increases, as is happening in India, as society goes through change, as women’s roles begin to change, as economies slow down and the slice of the pie becomes smaller — and it is connected to all these things. Just as it is integrally and fundamentally connected to the disregard, and indeed the hatred, for females that is so evident in the killing of female foetuses. For so widespread a crime, band aid solutions are not the answer.

Protest is important, it shakes the conscience of society, it brings people close to change, it makes them feel part of the change. And there is a good chance that the current wave of protests will lead to at least some results — perhaps even just fast track courts. But perspective is also important: we need to ask ourselves: if it had been the army in Manipur or Kashmir who had been the rapists, would we have protested in quite the same way? Very likely not, for there nationalism enters the picture. Remember Kunan Posphpora in the late nineties when the Rajasthan Rifles raped over 30 women? Even our liberal journalists found it difficult to credit that this could have happened, that the army could have been capable of this, and yet, the people of Kunan Poshpora know. Even today, women from this area find it difficult to marry — stigma has a long life. Would we have been as angry if the rape had taken place in a small town near Delhi and the victim had been Dalit? Remember Khairlanji? Why did that rape, of a mother and her daughter, gruesome, violent, heinous, and their subsequent murder not touch our consciences in quite the same way.

It is important to raise our collective voice against rape. But rape is not something that occurs by itself. It is part of the continuing and embedded violence in society that targets women on a daily basis. Let’s raise our voices against such violence and let’s ask ourselves how we, in our daily actions, in our thoughts, contribute to this, rather than assume that the solution lies with someone else. Let’s ask ourselves how we, our society, we as people, create and sustain the mindset that leads to rape, how we make our men so violent, how we insult our women so regularly, let’s ask ourselves how privilege creates violence.

It is important we raise our collective voice for women, but let’s raise it for all women, let’s raise it so that no woman, no matter that she be poor, rich, urban, rural, Dalit, Muslim, Hindu, or whatever, ever, in the future, has to face sexual violence, and no man assumes that because of the system and people’s mindsets, he can simply get away with it. And let’s raise it also for men, for transgenders, for the poor — all those who become targets of violence. Let’s not forget that the young rape survivor in Delhi was accompanied by a friend who too was subjected to violence and nearly killed. Let’s talk about him too.

(Urvashi Butalia is a feminist writer and founder of Zubaan, an independent non-profit publishing house.)

Source

OP: I felt out of all the articles that I have read on the protests in India, this one is the best because it raises the questions that people either avoid or push aside, esp when it comes to the military and their violent actions in various parts of the country, but more especially in Kashmir where the Army is given a clean slate no matter what they do, no matter how much evidence is given. If people want change they have to ensure that with it the accountability is equal across the board.
Mods! Thanks for the Kashmir tag!!!

mutive 4th-Jan-2013 09:28 pm (UTC)
First, more than 90 per cent of rapes are committed by people known to the victim/survivor, a staggering number of rapists are family members. When we demand the death penalty, do we mean therefore that we should kill large numbers of uncles, fathers, brothers, husbands, neighbours? How many of us would even report cases of rape then?

I'm against the death penalty for a number of reasons, so no, I don't want all these scum bags put to death. I would like them tried and put in prison for a very long time, though.

Being an uncle/father/brother/husband/neighbor...none of these give you a pass on rape.
wowsolovely 4th-Jan-2013 11:25 pm (UTC)
I really don't get the tone of this article so far (still reading) Rape is horrible and honestly they should be killed but I understand that is not how it works but the fact that they are uncles or policeman should not matter. They committed a horrible act against someone thats what matters. The tone makes me feel like oh if police or family members rape I mean we should punish them less. wtf.
lozbabie 4th-Jan-2013 11:50 pm (UTC)
No what it's saying that if the death penalty is on the table women who are raped by uncles, brothers, fathers are less likely to report rape as they don't want family members put to death.

mutive 4th-Jan-2013 11:59 pm (UTC)
Yeah, it's really puzzling to me. Like, on one hand, it seems to be saying, "We should get worked up about all rapes" (which I agree with). But then, on the other, it almost seems to be saying, "Look, we overlook all these other rapes, why make such a big deal about *this* one?" Which I don't agree with. Again, I'm not really for the death penalty...but there should be severe consequences for all rapes. Whether it's a gang rape of a virginal college student, or a father raping his daughter, or a police man raping the woman he's supposed to protect, or part of a war crime. They're all rape. They're all despicable. They all deserve to land their perpetrators in jail for a *very* long time.
natyanayaki 5th-Jan-2013 01:57 am (UTC)
It doesn't, and that's not what the author is saying. The author is addressing the possibility that a woman/girl would less likely be willing to report a case and knowing Indian society/culture I think it's very likely, no just because the woman/girl might have some affection for the male relative but because she would also have to deal with the rest of her family after the fact. Would the death penalty further dissuade a victim/survivor from reporting the attack? I don't know, but considering the culture/society I think that it is something that must be discussed.
burningmarl 4th-Jan-2013 10:05 pm (UTC)
Let’s Ask How We Contribute To Rape

well that was a nice little cold douse of water to the face.
jugglingeggs 9th-Jan-2013 01:50 pm (UTC)
Sorry, just went with the original title! :( Sorry if it triggered you in any way!
jenny_jenkins 4th-Jan-2013 10:19 pm (UTC)
"When we demand the death penalty, do we mean therefore that we should kill large numbers of uncles, fathers, brothers, husbands, neighbours?"

Rape isn't properly reported as it is. And everyone who rapes is SOMEONE'S son.

I say hang them.

I can't be rational about rape/sexual violence or what I think of as physically expressed misogyny - I just don't care anymore.

And a policeman who commits rape of a woman in custody? Castration first. Then hanging.
natyanayaki 5th-Jan-2013 01:54 am (UTC)
I think this is point the author is making, "How many of us would even report cases of rape then?" I didn't get the impression that the author is attempting to humanize the perpetrators, I thought she was delivering a "double whammy" of sorts, pointing out the fact that rapes occur within the family (something that isn't discussed at all in India), and based on Indian "family culture" and Indian "rape culture" when the perpetrator is a family member, the victim is less likely to report it, if the woman/girl thinks her father/brother/cousin/uncle will be hanged (and that she'll have to deal with her family afterwards) I could see that as being a deterrent.

Regarding police officers, while I personally believe that cops, politicians, judges etc should always get the maximum, but considering how corrupt the system is in India (much, much more so than the US), would harsher penalties make it easier or harder for the victims/survivors? I don't know the answer to it, I'm just worried drafting laws that the society isn't ready to handle could create some sort of backlash. I think there are a lot of other laws that probably should be changed first (India's tax laws for example), in order to foster an environment in which women aren't constantly under male guardianship.

Reg the article...I couldn't read through it because of the pictures, oh that poor girl.
zemi_chan 5th-Jan-2013 12:01 am (UTC)
ita.
mary_pickforded 5th-Jan-2013 10:04 pm (UTC)
I like the way you think.
browneyedguuurl Have you guys read about the high school football starts in Ohio known as "The Rape Crew"?4th-Jan-2013 11:28 pm (UTC)
http://www.theatlanticwire.com/national/2013/01/inside-anonymous-hacking-file-steubenville-rape-crew/60502/

I just read about this and am so disgusted. I can't even.
angelofdeath275 5th-Jan-2013 02:57 am (UTC)
I fucking cannot
This page was loaded Dec 16th 2017, 5:25 am GMT.