Glenn Beck: I believe in individual rights, unlike Obama and liberals
3:27 am - 05/07/2009
May 5th, 2009 1:03 PM Eastern
It’s Time to Stand Up for INDIVIDUAL Rights!
by Glenn Beck
[...]
I like to consider myself a rugged individualist. OK, maybe not the “rugged” part, but definitely an individual. I am unique, with a personal point of view like nobody else. I like to wear suits with sneakers, and I listen to a lot of Michael Buble. That’s just how I roll. And if I want my slice of pizza with pepperoni or sausage or baked ziti on top, I can have it. (I don’t know if they give out a Nobel Prize for “Snacks,” but I think someone should take a look at the guy who thought of putting baked ziti on pizza and reward him accordingly). And even if you disagree…if you think that baked ziti on pizza would be terrible and the only way to eat it is with pineapple (which should be a criminal offense), it doesn’t matter. My pizza rights are individual, and so are yours: A baked ziti slice for me, and a pineapple one for you. Everyone is a winner.
These days there’s too much talk about “the collective,” as though the rights that the Founding Fathers guaranteed us were done so to Americans as a group. That wasn’t the case then, and it sure as heck ain’t the case now (no matter how flowery a speech President Obama makes to get you to think differently).
Your rights as an American are individual rights. We may all share the same rights as American citizens, but those rights apply to you specifically and individually. I feel like I need to keep saying that word so it stays in the front of your and everybody’s mind—individual, individual, individual!
When the 2nd Amendment says that you have a right to bear arms, it means you, right there, sitting in front of your computer—YOU have the right to own a gun. YOU there in the green shirt eating M&Ms…YOU have the right to free speech. YOU…the woman wearing the slippers your grandkids bought you last Christmas—YOU have the right to a speedy trial with a jury of your peers (not that you did anything wrong—I’m just making a point).
YOU have the right to the pursuit of happiness, and YOU get to define that happiness however you like. It doesn’t matter if the government thinks that you should spend your weekend fixing that squeaky door to the guest room—if you want to take a nap in the backyard and drink root beer instead…YOU WIN!
If the government thinks that some businesses are “too important to fail” or that some irresponsible borrowers need a handout to pay their mortgage, THEY DON’T WIN! They’re spending your money, and it doesn’t, shouldn’t and can’t matter how “virtuous” the government’s intentions—sometimes, we’re not all in this together. I’m a businessman, and if my business does well, I get to individually enjoy the fruits of that success. But if my business does badly, I also get to individually take my lumps, suck it up, and try again. The truly American thing isn’t getting bailed out—it’s the fact that in this country, you get to try again.
I recently spoke with Harry Binswanger from the Ayn Rand Institute. We got to talking about the national shift we’re feeling from the power of the individual to working for the collective good–as defined by the government—and here’s what he thought would be necessary to change that:HARRY BINSWANGER: You need a philosophical revolution. That’s why I’m in philosophy. I want to teach the principles of individual rights and egoism.
GLENN BECK: You know, I was just talking about this…how neither party is standing up for the individual and individual rights. Neither side.
HARRY BINSWANGER: You’re absolutely right.
GLENN BECK: Nobody is teaching this. That’s the biggest problem we have.
HARRY BINSWANGER: That is. Yes. Ayn Rand was a big–the biggest advocate–of individualism. That’s what made this country great. All the other countries are collectivists - the group, the royal court, the tribe. Those are the people to whom you owe your life, and you’re just the serf. But in America, you’re born free.
GLENN BECK: Yes. But not anymore -
HARRY BINSWANGER: Well, that was the idea.
I disagree with Harry in only one way—not only was that the idea, it still is the idea.
I’m a big fan of Ayn Rand and I think there’s a lot that can be learned from her writings. Too many of our leaders are preaching a “what’s best for the state” message, and it’s got to stop. It’s coming from both parties, and there’s lots of blame to spread around. America is a tightly knit group of individuals, and it’s our independent spirit that has pulled us out of tougher jams than the one we’re in now. It’s worked before, and it will work again.
Don’t get me wrong—if you and a bunch of your buddies individually decide to pool all your money and go buy some land together in Vermont…beat on drums, eat brown rice and express your love of communal living through interpretive dance…while that may sound like Hell on Earth to me, I wish you all the best. Individuals can decide to do things together. Actually, we have a great tradition of that in the country, started by guys like Thomas Jefferson, John Hancock, Samuel Adams, Ben Franklin…
See—I knew this would al make sense in the end. Man, all this writing has really worked up my appetite. I’m gonna’ see if some of the guys want to go out and grab a bite for lunch…maybe some of that delicious cheese covered dough I was talking about? And even though ordering a whole pizza may be easier to make than a bunch of individual slices, it just doesn’t matter. They don’t get to choose, we do. I’ll get mine just the way I like it, and so can everybody else. After all, this is America.
Source: http://foxforum.blogs.foxnews.com/2
Beck says he is an Ayn Rand fan. Does he know Ayn Rand hated Christianity? Oh well. All conservatives love Ayn Rand lately.
These people make me head-desk, a lot.
Also, I don't approve of his using delicious, innocent pizza to 'prove his point'. Pizza never did anything to anyone.
Or a childless existence and a legal abortion?
Individual rights only extend as far as the bedroom door for most Republicans. If they can peek into yours and see anything other than a married man and women in the missionary position having sex for procreation's sake, then YOUR individual rights can go fuck themselves, since theirs trump all.
But maybe that's because I'm an idealist who watches too much Star Trek.
That explains everything. Now we know why Glen Beck Crazy.
Anyway, the difference between collective action representative of a purpose ('what's best for the state') and action by a 'tightly knit group of individuals' is only semantic. You can say it's a group (state, nation, whatever) or a bunch of people individually! deciding to do the same damn thing, and it makes no difference. Either way, there will be structure, there will be hierarchy and there will be opportunty for abuse of power or corruption.
WTF?? Wearing sneakers with suits and listening to sex-God Michael Buble makes you an individual? Well, damn.
I'm fascinated by this fear of "collectivism". I feel much safer working as a team and being in a group then being on my own...
And I love the idea of people coming together and uniting under one banner.
Call it communist propaganda or whatever. :P
couldn't stand Atlas Shrugged (and furthermore, Ayn Rand) to begin with, now I just want to punch people in the face when they talk about them without knowing anything about them
This was right around the time I dumped him. Not because he loved Ayn Rand (I was 17, I was not yet old and wise enough to realize this was a valid reason to dump someone) but because he told me he wanted me to be a stay-at-home mom when we got married and that we should have 4-5 kids.
I have since used this story as a cautionary tale to everyone I've ever dated since: quickest way to get rid of me is to tell me you want me to bear children.
edit: he also bought me a copy of The Fountainhead. I glanced at it, thought, "TL;DR" and put it on a shelf somewhere, never to be found again.
Edited at 2009-05-07 01:37 pm (UTC)
What an odd little man. Are we sure he's not part of some huge, Colbert style parody? Surely he isn't taken seriously? I've seen hand puppets with more credibility and coherence than him.
I am unique, with a personal point of view like nobody else. I like to wear suits with sneakers
UMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM...that's my man's trademark, douche:
Also, I follow the collective works of Stephen King, who teaches me that I have the power of controlling fire and that All Work And No Play Makes Jack A Dull Boy. I think that this philosophy should apply to all Americans.
Win. Since when is objectivism a real philosophy? My Firefox doesn't even recognize it as a word.
Her implementation was highly flawed, but that was the core concept of Objectivism, and in my opinion, that must necessarily be the core of any viable worldview.
That said, even Rand must be spinning in her grave from the absurdity being spewed in her name by people like Beck
I mean Clinton-style, I-never-had-sex-with-that-woman, bare-faced LYING kind of fraud...you'd think the poor, honest, right-wingey peeps would be all over this like...what? Soccer fans on the opposing team's fans?
Oops, so much for all that vaunted "principle"!
Edited at 2009-05-07 02:30 pm (UTC)
animalspeople are equal, but someanimalspeople are more equal than others.Gay people, women, non-whites and the poor are less equal of course.
I wonder if there are any conservatives with good taste in music
(also pineapple on pizza is ftw, I'm so glad Glen didn't usurp my favorite pizza topping! oh wait, I forgot...)
Edited at 2009-05-07 03:16 pm (UTC)
lol this. What if being a mass murderer made someone happy? Should we allow that? Hell no.
YOU have the right to the pursuit of happiness, and YOU get to define that happiness however you like. It doesn’t matter if the government thinks that you should spend your weekend fixing that squeaky door to the guest room—if you want to take a nap in the backyard and drink root beer instead…YOU WIN!
Unless it infringes on other people's rights. Or safety, in some cases. For example, you can't yell "fire!" in a crowded room, despite having the freedom of speech, because it might incite a big panicky stampede that could get people hurt or killed. And if your definition of "happiness" includes mass murder, well you're out of luck, because that's not covered under the Bill of Rights, even though it never explicitly states that type of condition in the actual document. It's covered by logic.
Nothing is absolute, moron.
Also, Ayn Rand? Geez.
Just don't try to define marriage the way you like.
This article does make me hungry for pizza, though.
Everything else, you're golden!
"...unless it comes from Mexico, in which case it should be banned."