ONTD Political

GOP demands a sex tax... no, is not about Legalizing prostitution. They finally lost their minds.

4:48 pm - 07/20/2009
Heard on the Hill: A Sex Surcharge?

And here we thought paying for sex was a no-no, especially for scandal-wary Members of Congress. But Rep. Steve Buyer thinks people who engage in the act (specifically, the kind that takes place sans protection) should have to pony up.

The Indiana Republican floated his unlikely cash-for-sex proposal Thursday during the markup of the health care bill in the Energy and Commerce Committee. Under the plan Buyer posited, those who engage in risky behavior, like smoking, not exercising and (ding, ding!) having unprotected sex, should have to pay a premium for their health care. After all, the reasoning goes, those people are more likely to incur higher health care costs than cigarette-eschewing, condom-wearing gym bunnies.

“Someone who smokes, drinks, participates in bad conduct and behavior, unprotected sex, maybe bad things happen to them, maybe they should pay higher premiums,” he mused. “That is a radical thought, isn’t it?”


And HOH should note that under such a scheme, at least one of his former colleagues might see his health care costs go up: Former Rep. Vito Fossella (R-N.Y.) fathered a love child and so presumably would get hit with the unprotected-sex surcharge.

Also, we have to wonder how such a plan might be enforced, since we can’t imagine many people would fess up to sneaking a ciggie or skipping a workout, let alone forgoing condoms.

Fast Food.
Congress has a full legislative plate these days, making it hard for Members to find time for a decent meal — and as a result, many are eating like college students cramming for finals.

Facing a late vote Thursday night, Democratic Senators feasted on takeout Chinese food in the chamber’s cloakroom. Sen. Claire McCaskill (Mo.) even tweeted about it, making sure to note that the food was “paid for personally by Senators NOT by taxpayers.” And about an hour later, McCaskill showed a bit of remorse over the not-so-healthy meal, posting: “now that I think about it, I should eat less!”

Just a few blocks from the Capitol, Sen. John Ensign proved that when the going gets tough, the tough get burgers.

HOH spotted the Nevada Republican (shirt and tie, no suit jacket) on Thursday evening leaving burger hotspot Good Stuff Eatery with a gaggle of what looked to be staffers. But the tasty fare didn’t seem to have done much to cheer up the sex-with-a-staffer-scandal-plagued Ensign, who looked grim as he left the eatery.

Maybe the GOPer isn’t a fan of the eatery’s “Prez Obama Burger”?

But the Senate wasn’t the only chamber grabbing a quick bite. While trying to power through a tedious, all-day markup Friday, House Appropriations Committee members nibbled on beef jerky and Georgia peanuts, an HOH spy reported. Staffers gave Members their own bags of the nuts, while Members shared the jerky. To ward off afternoon hunger pangs as the session wore on, Members were spotted munching out of small bags of SunChips.

Snacking, we note, is an Appropriations Committee tradition — Members on both sides of the aisle are known to bring in treats to share with colleagues.

Walk Off the Job.
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and Rep. John Spratt (D-S.C.) can’t be accused of ducking the health care debate.

Wyden and Spratt (and their staffs) are the 2009 winners of the Walking Works Capitol Hill Challenge, taking home the coveted Blue Shoe trophies for logging the most total miles and the highest average miles per walker, respectively.

Wyden staffers logged a total 7,648 miles during the six-week competition, while Spratt’s team averaged 273 miles per walker, the highest out of the 124 teams that took part.

Sponsored by the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association, the seventh annual contest tracked how far Congressional offices walked during the six weeks. Participants were outfitted with pedometers to track the distance.

More than 5,000 Members and staffers took part — 42 offices from the Senate and 82 from the House — and participants logged more than 125,000 total miles, amounting to more than 250 million steps.

The key to victory for Wyden? Getting everybody involved, spokeswoman Jennifer Hoelzer said.

More than 60 Wyden staffers took part in the challenge, including those who work in Wyden’s six Oregon field offices. “We had some staffers who committed to getting off a Metro stop early and some in Oregon who agreed to walk at lunch,” Hoelzer said.

On lighter workdays, some staffers walked to Chinatown for lunch, and others took long walks during breaks, all of which she says helped burn calories and boost morale.

Even Wyden took part, walking the stairs instead of riding the elevator. And because his pedometer contained a battery, it had to be scanned for listening devices before he could attend closed-door intelligence meetings, Hoelzer said.

Overheard on the Hill.
“In recent days he has reportedly been spotted waddling around the zoo’s public men’s room, skulking in stalls and inexplicably tapping his flipper. There’s even speculation that, as things continue to spiral, he may consider a run for political office.”

— Liberty Counsel’s Matt Barber, comparing Pepper, the jilted gay male penguin at the San Francisco Zoo whose partner dumped him for a female, to former Sen. Larry Craig (R-Idaho), in a July 16 opinion piece on Townhall.com.

Steven T. Dennis and CongressNow’s Emily Poe contributed to this report.

Can’t get enough HOH? Get a midday dose of fun and gossip with HOH’s One-Minute Recess, delivered to your inbox daily. Sign up here — because everyone deserves more recess.
random00b 21st-Jul-2009 12:01 am (UTC)
“Someone who smokes, drinks, participates in bad conduct and behavior, unprotected sex, maybe bad things happen to them, maybe they should pay higher premiums,” he mused. “That is a radical thought, isn’t it?”

Good luck trying to enforce the 'unprotected sex' piece there. At least one can (kinda) get a sense of who to charge re: smoking, drinking from purchases. How you gonna figure out who's having unsafe sex?
fofomazuzu 21st-Jul-2009 12:06 am (UTC)
Seriously, you could lie or start having unprotected sex. A person is not going to be truthful in this type of situation.
misatojaganshi 21st-Jul-2009 12:04 am (UTC)


jesus wants you to have a reward!
bombazzinedoll 21st-Jul-2009 12:18 am (UTC)
god I lol'd at that part.
boyracer1211 21st-Jul-2009 12:18 am (UTC)
Bring in a smoke and booze tax, sure. But an unprotected sex penalty? Bitch, please.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
erunamiryene 21st-Jul-2009 12:23 am (UTC)
How, particularly, are they planning on enforcing this?
helders 21st-Jul-2009 12:49 am (UTC)
they'll just assume anyone is isn't *married* is having unprotected sex? lol idk
maxvinyl 21st-Jul-2009 12:28 am (UTC)
lol good luck proving who's having unprotected sex and who isn't
ateenwriter 21st-Jul-2009 12:35 am (UTC)
mte
ateenwriter 21st-Jul-2009 12:33 am (UTC)
Photobucket
lidane 21st-Jul-2009 12:34 am (UTC)
How about getting insurance companies to cover birth control as well as Viagra? Oh, wait. That makes too much sense. Never mind. =P
erunamiryene 21st-Jul-2009 12:49 am (UTC)
Hey, you shush with your common sense!
bluetooth16 21st-Jul-2009 12:42 am (UTC)
THIS MAKES NO SENSE WHATSOEVER!!!
noir_aya 21st-Jul-2009 12:46 am (UTC)
Both Michael and Heidi agree that this GOP plan is absolutely crazy and makes no fucking sense at all.
Photobucket
sobota 21st-Jul-2009 12:48 am (UTC)
i think in his own stupid way, buyer is trying to make a point about taxes on sodas/junk food? I COULD BE TRYING TO MAKE HIM LOOK SMART, THOUGH.
afa_mom 21st-Jul-2009 01:06 am (UTC)
yes this
sunoftheskye 21st-Jul-2009 01:05 am (UTC)
filbypott 21st-Jul-2009 01:08 am (UTC)
Jesus Christ, that thing is gonna give someone a seizure.
filbypott 21st-Jul-2009 01:07 am (UTC)
This coming for the party that claims they want to keep the gummint out of people's lives.
ninevoltmoose 21st-Jul-2009 01:16 am (UTC)
mte.
kangofu 21st-Jul-2009 01:31 am (UTC)
What are they going to do, install a meter maid on vaginas and penises?
jaded110 21st-Jul-2009 01:37 am (UTC)
Is it bad that the first thing I thought of was "The Handmaids Tale?"
filbypott 21st-Jul-2009 02:00 am (UTC)
No, I think that's generally a sign of sanity.
peebs1701 21st-Jul-2009 01:38 am (UTC)
jmintmilano 21st-Jul-2009 01:45 am (UTC)
Republicans occasionally have good ideas....that are then made retarded.

Personally, I believe that health insurance should be like car insurance. Those with certain health issues (ESPECIALLY those with conditions that are predominately preventable) should pay more (aka people with tickets, accidents) because those are the people that are going to use more of the resources. It really is pretty fair, if you ask me.
lyahdan 21st-Jul-2009 06:46 pm (UTC)
First, driving a car is pretty optional. Getting treated for existing conditions? Well that's optional if you don't mind the suffering (and for some conditions-dying).

And those predominantly preventable conditions? First, it's a big assumption that everyone has equal access to the healthy food, quality education about health choices, etc. that would allow for equal opportunity in preventing those conditions. Second, which particular piece of research will you base these things on? Does drinking a glass of wine with dinner count the same as having a weekly bender for your health insurance surcharge?

But at the very base of it lies the fact that this places a huge barrier between doctors and patients. Doctors have enough trouble now getting patients to admit to risky practices so they can try easing into suggestions about things like quitting smoking. If there's a definite financial incentive to hide those behaviors, who will tell their doctors? The only way you're getting that information reliably is via some massive Big Brother nonsense.
___closetome 21st-Jul-2009 02:36 am (UTC)
not exercising and (ding, ding!) having unprotected sex

Sucks for Texas.

Edited at 2009-07-22 12:34 am (UTC)
koalafrog 21st-Jul-2009 02:41 am (UTC)
I thought the GOP didn't like taxes?
lidane 21st-Jul-2009 03:10 am (UTC)
They don't like taxes on corporations and investments. It cramps their usual style.

Taxing any personal behavior they don't like? They're all for that.
txvoodoo 21st-Jul-2009 03:22 am (UTC)
" participates in bad conduct and behavior"

That one means that a lot of bible-thumpin' GOP congress-types will be paying ;)
mindrtist 21st-Jul-2009 04:19 am (UTC)
THE SOCIALISTS DEMOCRATS WANT TO TAKE ALL YOUR FREEDOM, WE'RE JUST DOING THIS BEFORE THEY CAN GET TO IT.

WTF is wrong with these people, really.
flirflir 21st-Jul-2009 05:52 am (UTC)
what a GENIUS idea -__-
roboplege 21st-Jul-2009 02:23 pm (UTC)
wat
wee_little_me 21st-Jul-2009 03:32 pm (UTC)
*cocks eyebrow*

He's joking, right?
whosmurry 21st-Jul-2009 04:40 pm (UTC)
They found a new way to judge other people. Yay for them.
diamond_dust06 21st-Jul-2009 05:12 pm (UTC)
Ah, so this is why the Republican party has been pushing abstinence education. Fewer people engaging in protected sex means more people to tax. How deviously brilliant.
This page was loaded May 20th 2013, 1:26 pm GMT.