ONTD Political

Fake scent tracking dog sends man to prison for life...

5:24 pm - 07/30/2009
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

A Florida man who was convicted of murder in part because of the work of an allegedly infallible scent-tracking dog, is free now, because the dog and the dog’s owner has been exposed as a fraud. Unfortunately for Bill Dillon he had to spend 26 years in prison before the error in his case was rectified.

Bill Dillon, was 22 when he was sentenced to life in prison in 1981, for killing a man in Canova Beach on the eastern coast of the state.

During the trial, Dillon was adamant that he had not committed the crime. But a man named John Preston testified in court that he and his scent-tracking German-Shepherd connected Dillon to the killer’s bloody t-shirt. Preston said his dog, “Harrass 2,” even tracked Dillon’s scent repeatedly in later tests.

Dillon expected to remain in prison for the rest of his life – all because of “Harrass 2,” and his handler, Preston, who billed himself around the country as a so-called scent -tracking expert.

But nearly three decades later, in 2007, DNA testing proved that Dillon’s DNA did not match the DNA on the killer’s shirt. The dog was wrong. Just eight months ago, after 26 years behind bars, Bill Dillon walked out of prison a free man.

“Supposedly the dog got my scent three times,” Dillon told CNN, “and I never saw freedom again.” Dillon also said he remembers the dog’s “huge” head from the trial and that he looked like a “bear.”

In 1981, DNA testing wasn’t used in criminal investigations so authorities relied simply on the presumed legendary nose of Preston’s German Shepherd. Preston testified that his dog had tracked Dillon’s scent to a piece of paper he had touched, and had even tracked Dillon to a room he was in at the courthouse.

Preston and his dog had a track-record – he had convinced juries more than a hundred times of his dog’s miraculous talents. In Dillon’s case, Preston even told the court his dog had the ability to track a scent under water; to actually smell below the water. CNN consulted tracking dog experts in Florida about this. They told us “no way, that’s not possible.”

In 1984, before Preston was exposed as a fraud, he told ABC News that he believed he was never wrong. Tim McGuire, a dog-tracking expert with Florida’s Volusia County Sheriff’s Department, said it was implausible that a dog could have picked up Dillon’s scent back in 1981 eight days after the murder, and just after a massive hurricane had blown through the area.

McGuire viewed videotapes of Preston’s dog, Harrass 2, at work. In the tapes, there are multiple times when the dog urinates on evidence. “The dog should work methodically.” But McGuire said he did not consider what Harrass 2 was doing, “work.”

Preston was exposed by a Florida judge in 1984, who became suspicious of Preston and set up his own test for Harrass 2. The dog failed terribly.

Documents obtained by CNN show he could not even follow a scent for one-hundred feet. The judge determined the dog could only track successfully when his handler had advance knowledge of the case.

Dillon thinks Preston and his scent-tracking dog were part of a larger conspiracy.

“Preston could lead the dog to the suspect or the evidence,” alleges Dillon, but “any cases that were weak, not good enough to go to the jury, they [the prosecution] fed Preston information, paid him good money to come and lie.”

Florida’s Attorney General told CNN it is not aware of any evidence of a conspiracy involving John Preston and his dog.

Preston and his four-legged so-called expert were discredited in 1987. But the state of Florida never reviewed cases on which he’d testified . And nobody ever told Bill Dillon – who sat in prison another 20 years before he ever knew a thing about it. It wasn’t until 2006 that he heard Preston was a fake.

Florida’s Innocence Project believes dozens of inmates around the country may have been wrongly convicted as a result of John Preston and his dog. It is calling for an investigation of those cases. Meanwhile, Preston, the dog’s handler, died last year. He was never charged with perjury or convicted of a crime.

This whole thing pisses me off and makes me sad at the same time. Jesus Christ, that poor man :(

neev 31st-Jul-2009 12:53 am (UTC)
...THEY NEVER REVIEWED THE CASES???? What the HELL? And he was never charged? How is that even...? Augh, Florida...
lickety_split 31st-Jul-2009 01:02 am (UTC)
Preston even told the court his dog had the ability to track a scent under water

WTH @ people believing him. I'd be like, "How does he do that?? Ask the fish which way the scent carried off to??"
stellar_kar 31st-Jul-2009 01:03 am (UTC)
seriously wtf, like did his dog have gills so he was able to smell under water or was he part shark?
chimbleysweep 31st-Jul-2009 01:11 am (UTC)
Jeeeeeeeeeeesus Meriweather Christ.
stereosymbiosis 31st-Jul-2009 01:12 am (UTC)
I can't believe people believed that shit! and I can't believe that poor guy spent 26 years in prison based on the evidence of a scent dog omg.
potatoboat 31st-Jul-2009 01:16 am (UTC)
cats would never send an innocent man to jail
potatoboat 31st-Jul-2009 03:15 am (UTC)
then it's working
schonste 31st-Jul-2009 04:37 am (UTC)
koalafrog 31st-Jul-2009 06:14 am (UTC)
hahaha ia
the_con_cept 31st-Jul-2009 01:20 am (UTC)
Poor guy. It's really scary that people are so ignorant they bought a dog tracking through water.

And, off topic, Herman's Hermits--squeeeeee! I got to dance with Peter Noone when I was a little girl. :D
ladylothwen 31st-Jul-2009 01:22 am (UTC)
angi_is_altered 31st-Jul-2009 01:26 am (UTC)
nostariel 31st-Jul-2009 01:56 am (UTC)
Oh, Florida. Not reviewing the cases or informing the people convicted makes me wonder a little about Dillon's conspiracy theory. Not that I think they all sat down and twirled their mustaches while plotting evil, but c'mon, someone had to have suspected the dog wasn't legit before that judge did. It was a convenient way to get convictions, so everyone looked the other way, IMO.

It's so sad that we need the Innocence Project in this country, but obviously we really, really do. :(
ojuzu 31st-Jul-2009 02:42 am (UTC)
OT, but it must be said: I'm so very happy someone uses the acronym tags. ♥ ♥ ♥
victorialupin 31st-Jul-2009 02:47 am (UTC)
How do you make acronym tags?
ojuzu 31st-Jul-2009 03:27 am (UTC)
I think it's <*acronym title="what the acronym is of"*>the acronym<*/acronym*>. Minus asterisks, of course. I believe it's the same for abbreviations, only replacing 'acronym' with 'abbr'.
victorialupin 31st-Jul-2009 03:30 am (UTC)
Thank you! :)
keeni84 31st-Jul-2009 03:36 am (UTC)
OMG this is so awesome! :D
nostariel 31st-Jul-2009 03:32 am (UTC)

<acronym title="This Is An Acronym">TIAA</acronym> [example: TIAA]

If you want to make the cursor different on hover:

<acronym title="This Is An Acronym" style="cursor:help;">TIAA</acronym> [example: TIAA]

If you want to make sure there's always an underline, too:

<acronym title="This Is An Acronym" style="border-bottom: 1px dashed; cursor: help;">TIAA</acronym> [example: TIAA]
nostariel 31st-Jul-2009 03:13 am (UTC)
\:D/ I have much love for both the abbreviation and acronym tags. LJAddons (a Firefox extension) makes them ridiculously easy to use, thank goodness, or I'd never remember. And your icon is fabulous!
suzermagoozer 31st-Jul-2009 01:58 am (UTC)
oh god.
reason #8,472 why i am against the death penalty.
noir_aya 31st-Jul-2009 02:58 am (UTC)
jesidres 31st-Jul-2009 04:28 am (UTC)
Appropriate use of macro- this is truly a WTF moment.

coldxxheritage 31st-Jul-2009 04:34 am (UTC)
Omg, what a way to put down German Shepherds. My baby does not approve.

Seriously though, that's heartbreaking.
schonste 31st-Jul-2009 04:39 am (UTC)
AWWWW *snorzles doggy*
evildevil 31st-Jul-2009 05:34 am (UTC)
sue them, sue them for all their monies!!!
lostwiginity 31st-Jul-2009 04:16 pm (UTC)
I had to reread the entire thing because my brain somehow decided that the title says "Fake accent tracking dog".
This page was loaded Nov 26th 2015, 12:29 pm GMT.