ONTD Political

New Hampshire Court orders Christian homeschooled girl to attend public school

1:32 pm - 08/28/2009
A Christian homeschool girl in New Hampshire has been ordered into government-run public school for having "sincerely held" religious beliefs -- and the Alliance Defense Fund is troubled by the ruling.

The case involves divorced couple Martin Kurowski and Brenda Voydatch and their 10-year-old daughter, Amanda. The couple split in 1999 when they were living in Massachusetts, and the proceedings moved to New Hampshire after Voydatch relocated to that state with her daughter in 2002.

Although Voydatch has primary custody over Amanda, both parents agreed to a parenting plan that included joint decision-making responsibility. A court-appointed guardian served as a mediator.

A source of contention between the parents has been the mother's decision to home school Amanda since first grade. Amanda's father believes she should be sent to public school, while the mother is adamant about home schooling. Since both parents have failed to reach common ground, the issue moved to the court.

The situation was then analyzed by the court-appointed guardian, who made a recommendation to the court. During the evaluation process it was determined that Amanda was excelling in her schooling and used curriculum that was approved by her school district. The curriculum used in her home schooling was created by certified teachers, and Amanda routinely took standardized tests.

Furthermore, Amanda attended her local public school to take art, Spanish, and P.E. classes. Her public school instructors also commented on the fact that Amanda was well-rounded in her social skills. But a sticking point arose concerning Voydatch's Christian faith.

The court order stated: "According to the guardian ad litem's further report and testimony, the counselor found Amanda to lack some youthful characteristics. She appeard to reflect her mother's rigidity on questions of faith." The guardian noted that during a counseling session, Amanda tried to witness to the counselor and appeared "visibly upset" when the counselor purposefully did not pay attention.

The guardian also noted that Amanda's relationship with her father suffered because she did not think he loved her as much as he said he did due to the fact that he refused to "adopt her religious beliefs."

According to the court order, the guardian concluded that Amanda's "interests, and particularly her intellectual and emotional development, would be best served by exposure to a public school setting in which she would be challenged to solve problems presented by a group learning situation and...Amanda would be best served by exposure to different points of view at a time in her life when she must begin to critically evaluate multiple systems of belief and behavior."

Furthermore the court order states that despite Amanda's mother insisting that her daughter's religious beliefs were her own, "it would be remarkable if a ten-year-old child who spends her school time with her mother and the vast majority of all her other time with her mother would seriously consider adopting any other religious point of view."

Although the court noted that it "is extremely reluctant to impose on parents a decision about a child's education," it ruled that Amanda must attend public school.

Alliance Defense Fund-allied attorney John Anthony Simmons has filed a motion to reconsider. He says this ruling is dangerous to home schoolers because it will set a precedent for other cases.

"Every time you have a court order that uses a wrong standard or misapplies constitutional law, everyone's rights are eventually at stake," the attorney explains. "Because what happens with precedent is it gets expanded -- it gets cited in other cases."

Simmons believes this case goes beyond the initial divorce and custody battle with this ruling because the standard used in the decision contained in the court order is troubling. He contends that the child's religion should not have played a role in the decision, and that the court should have focused solely on the academic merits of Amanda's education which proved to be excellent.



Source


This is frightening as I homeschool my children.

Edited for grammar.
Page 1 of 3
<<[1] [2] [3] >>
[info]missmurchison 28th-Aug-2009 05:44 pm (UTC)
i home scholl my children

I... never mind. I can't even think of a response.
[info]my_private_muse 28th-Aug-2009 05:45 pm (UTC)
LOL. D:
[info]likespring 28th-Aug-2009 05:49 pm (UTC)
this is frightening as i home scholl my children

What is home scholling and what does it have to do with this article? jw.
[info]afa_mom 28th-Aug-2009 05:51 pm (UTC)
oops i fixed it
[info]popehippo 28th-Aug-2009 05:50 pm (UTC)
this is frightening as i home scholl my children

PFFFFFFFFFFFFFFT HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
[info]afa_mom 28th-Aug-2009 05:52 pm (UTC)
interesting that nobody has anything to say about the actual article
[info]bluebombardier 28th-Aug-2009 05:50 pm (UTC)
Because it's one thing to home school and quite another to brainwash.
[info]afa_mom 28th-Aug-2009 05:52 pm (UTC)
public schools brainwash people to
[info]ohkatespade 28th-Aug-2009 05:52 pm (UTC)
I hope you're not teaching them English.

That being said, you're taking the article completely out of context. She wasn't forced to go to public school because she is Christian. She was forced because:

1. Her father wanted her to.
2. While intelligent and socially up to par, her emotional development is a bit of an issue.

This is no different then any other court case involving a child whose parents have joint custody. I mean, did you even read the article before you posted it?
[info]ehhhhnotreally 28th-Aug-2009 05:53 pm (UTC)
God, this exactly! It's irritating when people skim or just read a headline and then run with it. Headlines are MEANT to get your attention!! They shock!
[info]zombienurse 28th-Aug-2009 05:52 pm (UTC)
It shouldn't be frightening unless you and your old man split and have to use the court system to resolve your conflicting parenting styles.
[info]my_private_muse 28th-Aug-2009 05:53 pm (UTC)
LOL, here we go.

When I see religious zealots homeschooling their children and their curriculum is dictating that "Evolution" is false, and "Creation" is fact, THAT'S my issue.

It's terrifying.

I've spoken to people that have been home-schooled, and they'd try to sneak side-readings AFTER their "creation/'science'." They told tell me, "Oh yeah Jen, it's strictly "Biblical science." (LOL oxymoron)

As a student of medicine and a lover of nerdy science, it's just enraging to me. Homeschooling, hm. Yeah. I'm not sure if I'm a complete fan of it.

A slippery slope.

[info]afa_mom 28th-Aug-2009 06:04 pm (UTC)
thats why i home school my kid's though, because i dont want them learning about evilution and how we were born from monkeys.
[info]volksjager 28th-Aug-2009 05:54 pm (UTC)
It is amazing to see how much NH has changed in one generation.
[info]afa_mom 28th-Aug-2009 06:05 pm (UTC)
it really is shocking. people fled from Mass to escape from liberalism and now they are just doing it to NH now
[info]bombazzinedoll 28th-Aug-2009 05:55 pm (UTC)
god, this is such a poor attempt at trolling.
[info]nowadventuring 28th-Aug-2009 05:57 pm (UTC)
Seriously.
[info]roboplege 28th-Aug-2009 05:56 pm (UTC)
OH MAN YOU'RE BACK HIIIIIII
[info]bluetooth16 28th-Aug-2009 05:56 pm (UTC)
I APPROVED THIS FOR THE LULZ AND YOU DEFINITELY BROUGHT IT!
[info]apocalypsos 28th-Aug-2009 05:59 pm (UTC)
God, I love you sometimes. :D
[info]ehhhhnotreally 28th-Aug-2009 05:57 pm (UTC)
[info]h8lyfe 28th-Aug-2009 05:58 pm (UTC)
HAHAHA WIN
[info]ohkatespade 28th-Aug-2009 05:59 pm (UTC)
LOLOLOL We're on the 3rd edit of a 9 word sentence and that shit is still wrong! OP, you are a terrible advocate for home schooling.
[info]ehhhhnotreally 28th-Aug-2009 06:01 pm (UTC)
It's a troll!!
[info]speaker 28th-Aug-2009 05:59 pm (UTC)
am i the only one who finds NO humor in afa_mom? trolling isn't funny when you have to create such an over-the-top caricature.
[info]bombazzinedoll 28th-Aug-2009 06:02 pm (UTC)
mte. she's just so predictable, it's no fun anymore
[info]ehhhhnotreally 28th-Aug-2009 06:00 pm (UTC)

:edited for grammer


lol, this combined with your new jesus-approved icon just gives you away. TROLL FAIL. Next time: try to conceal the fact that you're trying to cause a ruckus!
[info]dayumsam 28th-Aug-2009 06:02 pm (UTC)
lolz ikr
[info]my_private_muse 28th-Aug-2009 06:03 pm (UTC)
I say we just turn this post into a True Blood sexy gif post. Because honestly, we'd get more out of it.







You're welcome.
[info]ehhhhnotreally 28th-Aug-2009 06:06 pm (UTC)
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

more sam plz?
[info]apocalypsos I'm on it!28th-Aug-2009 06:19 pm (UTC)



[info]wabash 28th-Aug-2009 06:05 pm (UTC)
There is a reason why there are little red squiggly lines under words like say, tuter and grammer. There is this great thing called Spell Check! Use it. It is your friend.
[info]afa_mom 28th-Aug-2009 06:08 pm (UTC)
i dont think this computer has a spell check
[info]popehippo 28th-Aug-2009 06:08 pm (UTC)
This is frightening as I Home School my Children

And yet you still got it wrong.
[info]bludstone 28th-Aug-2009 06:09 pm (UTC)
welllllll homeschoolers do outperform public schooled kids by leaps and bounds. and the government shouldnt be in the business of telling people how to educate their kids (of course, i dont even think there should be a department of education)

Amanda gets assaulted by a dickhole bully in 3-2-1...
[info]roboplege 28th-Aug-2009 06:12 pm (UTC)
Yeah but this is because of the parents split really.
[info]wonderpup 28th-Aug-2009 06:09 pm (UTC)
[info]my_private_muse 28th-Aug-2009 06:10 pm (UTC)
LOL omg.

Ilu.
[info]tenners 28th-Aug-2009 06:09 pm (UTC)
i love [info]afa_mom!!
[info]toaerythinness 28th-Aug-2009 06:16 pm (UTC)
cool story bro
[info]h8lyfe Okay.28th-Aug-2009 06:10 pm (UTC)
This is getting a little pathetic.
"grammer"??
And what is with those Capitalized Letters On words that Shouldn't be Capitalized?

And by little pathetic, I mean extremely pathetic.
I hope your Children get a Decent Education.
[info]someidiot 28th-Aug-2009 06:11 pm (UTC)
If I were the judge, I would have sent the girl to public school, too. Not based on her emotional development or Christian views, but on the grounds that public school should be the "default" situation, and the child should only be homeschooled (or go to private school) with the approval of both/all responsible parents or guardians. Responsible being they have at least partial custody of the child or pay child support. Unless, of course, homeschool would somehow benefit their mental/social/emotional health.

I'm sure there's a lot of loopholes in that logic, though. I might be opening a can of worms, too, since I'm considering homeschooling my hypothetical future children. What do you guys think?
[info]missmurchison 28th-Aug-2009 06:18 pm (UTC)
There are a lot of reasons for home schooling. I've seen it be very successful, and a disaster. One of the unsuccessful cases was the most warranted, because the child had a lot of emotional problems and wasn't able to cope with school, so I don't know if there was a good option for her at that point in her life. (She did eventually graduate public high school, but that was after therapy had mitigated the emotional issues.)

It works best when there's good support from the local school system and the kids are given lots of chances to interact with others their age from the early grades. By middle and high school, even home schoolers usually take some classes at the public schools because courses like sciences that require labs and band or choir are impossible to manage at home. (Unless you have enough kids for your own band, I suppose.)
[info]roboplege 28th-Aug-2009 06:11 pm (UTC)
Photobucket

^ They miss you and want you to come home :(
Page 1 of 3
<<[1] [2] [3] >>
This page was loaded Jun 1st 2012, 7:40 pm GMT.