ONTD Political

Feds: Top e-tailers profitting from billion-dollar Web scam

1:54 pm - 11/17/2009

Words like "scam," "fraud," and "arrest" filled the air during a Senate hearing on Tuesday that focused on the controversial marketing companies that allegedly dupe consumers into paying monthly fees to join online loyalty programs.

Vertrue, Webloyalty and Affinion generated more than $1.4 billion by "misleading" Web shoppers, said members of the U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation, which called the hearing. Lawmakers saved their harshest rebuke for Web retailers that accepted big money--a combined sum of $792 million--to share their customers' credit-card information with the marketers.

Senate investigators launched their six-month investigation by examining complaints from people who discovered mysterious charges on their credit card bill. According to testimony given at the hearing, some of the alleged victims were unaware that they had become members of the loyalty programs and mistakenly paid fees for years.

The government says the investigation shows that Webloyalty, Affinion and Vertrue "trick" consumers into entering their e-mail address just before they complete purchases at sites such as Orbitz, Priceline.com, Buy.com, 1-800 Flowers, Continental Airlines, Fandango, and Classmates.com.

"When we agree to buy something from retailers we expect a merchant to protect our credit card and other information...what's happening is many online merchants have decided to betray their customers' trust."
--Sen. John Rockefeller


Unsuspecting shoppers are confronted by blocks of dense "fine print" according to the Senate report. Customers then enter their e-mail addresses thinking they are signing up to receive some kind of cash-back offer or coupon. Instead, they are unwittingly agreeing to allow the retailer to release their credit card information to the loyalty programs.

"When people shop online, they have the right to expect that the stores they entrust with their credit card and other personal information will not share it," said Sen. John Rockefeller, (D-West Virginia), the committee's chairman. "What's happening is many online merchants have decided to betray their customers' trust... fine print is the (biggest) scam of all time."

The way the government lays out its findings, it appears the loyalty programs are profiting off of the reluctance of many consumers to read fine print, check their credit card statements, and the blind trust many have in the stores where they shop.

Vertrue and Webloyalty issued statements saying they have changed their practices and have opted to require consumers to key in some credit card or other information to enroll into one of the company's membership programs. Expert witnesses and government officials said during the hearing that these alterations don't go far enough.

Perhaps most importantly, witnesses also said the best and only way to defeat clean up the problem is to make it unlawful for retailers to ever sell their customers personal information.

Affinion representatives were not immediately available for interview.

Rockefeller noted during the hearing that Vertrue and Webloyalty dropped some of their business practices only after senate investigators were well into their probe. He also remarked that some of the retail companies, including U.S. Airways, had informed him that they they had ceased doing business with the marketers. He told the audience at the hearing and those who watched via a Webcast, that he anticipated Continental Airlines would do the same.

The government's report provides a jaw-dropping amount of information that shows:

• Managers at Webloyalty, Affinion, and Vertrue are fully aware that most of the people signing up for memberships are unaware that they doing it.

• Their programs are designed to mislead consumers into signing up.

"Classmates.com, which has been partnered with each company at different times and has earned more than any other partner, generated approximately $70 million in revenue."
--From the Senate report


• Retailers doing business with the companies are also aware that customers are likely to be angered once they notice the charges but do it because they are paid big bucks. Classmates.com has pocketed $70 million from partnering with the all three companies, according to the report. The government says that 88 retailers have made more than $1 million through the partnerships with e-loyalty programs, while 19 have made more than $10 million.

"The more aggressively an e-commerce company is willing to market Affinion, Vertrue, or Webloyalty's membership clubs to its customers, the more money it will earn," the Senate Commerce committee wrote in the report.

Another reason e-tailers risk alienating customers is that some of the e-loyalty companies insulate the Web stores from customer complaints. They call these complaints "customer noise." To illustrate this, the Senate committee included excerpts from a letter from a Priceline shopper who said she was charged for a loyalty membership for over a year without her knowledge.

The governments investigation will continue. According to a senate staffer, Rockefeller will invite the CEOs of Webloyalty, Affinion and Vertrue to testify at another hearing, which will likely be held sometime early next year.

To watch a replay of the Senate hearing go here.



Source

the best and only way to defeat clean up the problem is to make it unlawful for retailers to ever sell their customers personal information


It's one of those things you would think aren't legal in the first freaking place.
wonderpup 18th-Nov-2009 02:42 am (UTC)
Can I get a source?
pichipai 18th-Nov-2009 02:47 am (UTC)
Sorry! Added. Plus my lj-cut vanished, so I added that too @_@
suitablyemoname 18th-Nov-2009 02:45 am (UTC)
I am honestly amazed that anyone continues to have anything to do with classmates.com

It itself is the scammiest scam that ever did scam, and Facebook is a much better way of doing literally everything on the site. (Facebook is only marginally less evil, but is substantially less scammy, and is much more likely to actually have someone from your HS in the first place.)

Then again, it's kind of cute how whenever I see a banner ad, it tells me that my friends in the graduating class of George Washington High School are looking for me. Because I totally graduated from an American high school, oh yes.
bluetooth16 18th-Nov-2009 02:53 am (UTC)
Why is classmates.com so scammy besides what's listed in the article?

Edited at 2009-11-18 02:54 am (UTC)
suitablyemoname 18th-Nov-2009 04:34 am (UTC)
They convince people to sign up by bombarding them with requests from people who don't actually exist. ("We have four people from your graduating class who are looking for you!") They make you register and pay to access any content. They make it incredibly, notoriously difficult to cancel your account, ever, and don't believe in refunds under any circumstances. They keep your information forever and use it to send you promotional materials whether you want them or not, even if you deleted your account ages ago.

It's basically a front for a marketing company. A marketing company you pay for the privilege of being marketed to.
bluetooth16 18th-Nov-2009 04:38 am (UTC)
I get it now. Thanks for answering my question!
owl_eyes_4ever 18th-Nov-2009 02:47 am (UTC)
Amazon isn't on the list but Yahoo is?
jmintmilano 18th-Nov-2009 03:09 am (UTC)
I got caught up in one of these scams or something similar.

I saw a $14.95 charge on my debit account, figured out it came from this time I bought an airline ticket online and was enrolled in this club where I had a few months free then had to start paying. I canceled my card the next day. suck it, bitches.
juliet316 18th-Nov-2009 03:18 am (UTC)
And people wonder why I never really shop online.
brewsternorth 18th-Nov-2009 07:18 pm (UTC)
mte.
heartlockedx 18th-Nov-2009 04:23 am (UTC)
I just want to know who the hell gave my debit card info to adultfriendfinder.com
I had to ask the bank for a new card because when I contacted the website asking them how they got my info their answer was that I have to give them my card number or else they couldn't pull out any account information. How stupid do they think I am?
zarak 18th-Nov-2009 06:59 pm (UTC)
What about the retailers who give the info away for free?
cobrarojo 19th-Nov-2009 03:28 am (UTC)
This happened to me when I bought books from half.com. I freaked out when one day I saw that some company called ReservationRewards had been siphoning $9 from my bank account for as long as my bank had online records. I called the phone number listed with the charges on my statements & found out that they had been taking $9 a month for the last THREE YEARS. I went ape-shit. They refunded everything. It was funny because they couldn't do it in a lump-sum for some reason, so I had thirty-three charges of +$9 to my account.
Teaches me to check my bank statement more than once every three years.
This page was loaded May 21st 2013, 1:39 am GMT.