ONTD Political

Margaret Thatcher blocked Soviet aid for striking miners, files reveal

11:08 pm - 08/29/2010

She was the prime minister at the height of her powers, using every arm of the state to crush the striking miners. He was the Soviet heir apparent who had authorised a large donation to help striking comrades in the UK.

Now newly released Downing Street documents have shed fresh light on the relationship between Margaret Thatcher and Mikhail Gorbachev, exposing how Thatcher exerted intense diplomatic pressure on the future leader to successfully block a Soviet donation of much-needed cash to the strikers.

 



The documents, released to the Guardian after a five-year freedom of information battle, show how the pair clashed during the titanic miners' strike that convulsed Britain in 1984-85.



In October 1984, six months into the dispute, the National Union of Mineworkers was desperate for cash to fund the strike, because a judge had ordered the confiscation of the union's entire assets.
The NUM leader, Arthur Scargill, had stepped up efforts to raise cash from the USSR; Soviet miners had responded by donating more than $1m from their wages.



To avoid the cash being seized by the court-appointed official who had been put in charge of the NUM's finances, it had to be transferred clandestinely to the union. The Soviets attempted to transfer the cash to an NUM bank account in Zurich, but it, like other accounts, was frozen.



The money bounced back, but Thatcher soon learnt of the manoeuvre and became worried.
The proposed donation threatened to derail a planned visit by Gorbachev to Britain to foster better relations between east and west.



Gorbachev was at that time second-in-command of the Soviet Union and tipped to take over when the ailing leader, Konstantin Chernenko, died. The relationship between Thatcher and Gorbachev was beginning to blossom; she would later famously declare him someone with whom she could "do business".



Thatcher wanted to know whether Gorbachev had approved the donation, since the Soviet miners would have needed government permission to convert roubles into foreign currency. Colin Budd, an aide to the then foreign secretary, Geoffrey Howe, also warned in a confidential letter to Charles Powell,
the prime minister's foreign affairs adviser, that there would be a "serious political row" if a Soviet coalmine foreman, due to accompany Gorbachev in the official delegation, addressed a rally of striking miners in the UK.



Norman Lamont, then an industry minister and later chancellor under John Major, was instructed by Thatcher to lodge a protest "with some force" over lunch with the Soviet ambassador. According to Budd, Lamont "stressed that the government viewed with great concern the transfer of money from the Soviet Union to the NUM.
He said that the Soviet Union must understand that the UK government considered this a very serious matter … He hoped that the Soviet Union would not risk souring the atmosphere" of Gorbachev's forthcoming visit.



The British found the encounter "somewhat unsatisfactory", as the ambassador, Viktor Popov, appeared unmoved. "The ambassador simply maintained that Soviet
trade unions were independent and democratic and that the Soviet government was not answerable for their exercise of their rights" to donate to their British comrades.



The Thatcher government intensified the diplomatic pressure. Three days before Gorbachev's visit in December, Thatcher ordered that the Soviet ambassador be summoned to the Foreign Office. There, David Goodall, a senior diplomat, told him that if the Soviet government had authorised the donation, the British government
"would take a very serious view and regard it as an unfriendly and unwarrantable interference in British domestic affairs".



The following day, a senior Soviet official returned to the Foreign Office with a message stating that "any form of aid that might be given to the British miners would be undertaken independently by the Soviet miners without the slightest participation of the Soviet government or its departments".



At Chequers, Thatcher personally confronted Gorbachev and protested that the Soviet Union was meddling in British matters and would help to prolong the strike by giving the cash.
Gorbachev stonewalled, claiming that he was not aware of any such donation. It later transpired that a month before the Chequers meeting, Gorbachev had himself signed the papers authorising the donation.


But Thatcher's diplomatic offensive worked: no donation reached the British miners during their year-long strike. Gorbachev had embarked on his effort to reform the sclerotic Soviet state and concluded that the wiser option was to continue cultivating the British prime minister for the sake of relations between the two countries. Sacrificing the interests of the British miners was the price to be paid for not upsetting the so-called Iron Lady.

Guardian


p.s. mods, not exactly a timewarp post, rather reporting on the files that were just released to the Guardian revealing new information about past events.

 

bluetooth16 Maude Comment29th-Aug-2010 10:55 pm (UTC)
I rejected it because the original subject line was misleading. It's fine now.
x_butterfly19_x Re: Maude Comment29th-Aug-2010 11:20 pm (UTC)
I realised. Thanks!
mephisto5 29th-Aug-2010 11:22 pm (UTC)
...

...

...


*eyetwitch*


My views on thatcher were beginning to thaw once I'd read about her environmental work. But between this and her comments after the 1985 Brixton riots? She can go suck a shotgun.
evewithanapple 29th-Aug-2010 11:25 pm (UTC)
Ugh.
leelakin 29th-Aug-2010 11:54 pm (UTC)
Just another day in The Evil Life of Margaret Thatcher.
myriadne 30th-Aug-2010 12:31 am (UTC)
You know, I respect Thatcher more than I respect Reagan, but I also despise her more. She was smart and knew what she was doing. Evil was what she was doing, but she knew it.


I feel inspired to watch Our Friends in the North again. The miner's strike episode is devastating.
x_butterfly19_x 30th-Aug-2010 10:14 am (UTC)
She was smart and knew what she was doing.

Exactly. This was a calcualted move to surpress the strike, so she'd have guaranteed success in shutting down the industry.

I sort of sympathise with the arguments which state it was necessary for the economy (some may not even agree with that), but you cannot deny that she was an absolute bitch in the way she carried out this policy.

Cold war politicking and the court order probably come into this somewhere but still...

Why do you have less respect for Reagan than for her?
myriadne 30th-Aug-2010 03:28 pm (UTC)
TBH, the only thing I think Reagan ever did that was worth much was to raise Ron, who has come out very well despite everything (unfortunately, his siblings, not so much, so perhaps it was just Ron's own nature). But my lack of respect goes back to the near-treasonous manipulation of the Iran hostage thing behind Carter's back. Iran-Contra in general. His narrow-mindedness about energy (first order of business, take Carter's solar panels off the White House and set us back 35 years, ON PURPOSE). I think also that it was clear by his second term that he was suffering from Alzheimer's and little to nothing was done to safeguard the country. The list is a long one.
x_butterfly19_x 31st-Aug-2010 10:22 am (UTC)
The "special relationship" of him and Thatcher must have been fun times all round!
blackjedii 30th-Aug-2010 12:46 am (UTC)
I only remember itty bitty bits and pieces of that time.

But whenever I hear Thatcher I think of an episode of The Young Ones where they find a missile and the punk goes all "This is for YOU, THATCHER!!"

So now my immediate response to anyone fangirling her is "THATCHER!"
omgangiepants 30th-Aug-2010 01:04 am (UTC)
Congratulations to Margaret Thatcher for being the only person on the planet with Alzheimer's whom I have absolutely no pity or sympathy for.
escherichiacola 30th-Aug-2010 01:36 am (UTC)
In the true form of any free government, better dead than red is decided by the government.
schonste the only words I have30th-Aug-2010 02:32 am (UTC)
DIS BITCH
x_butterfly19_x Re: the only words I have30th-Aug-2010 09:58 am (UTC)
My first thoughts exactly.
silly_cakes 30th-Aug-2010 04:06 am (UTC)
Hate her. So much.
damnthatrogue 30th-Aug-2010 11:09 am (UTC)
I predict the day that she dies, a lot of people will be happier.

The news might say she was a great woman. I'll just laugh. Thatcher the Milk Snatcher? There's a reason Thatcher is hated by a lot of the country, and the Conservatives.
red_pill 30th-Aug-2010 12:27 pm (UTC)
forgive me, but why exactly did she freeze the NUMs accounts?
x_butterfly19_x 30th-Aug-2010 12:44 pm (UTC)
I'm not very well versed in the ins and outs, so forgive me if I'm wrong, but in a nutshell I think she was attempting to halt or weaken the NUM ordered miner's strike.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UK_miners%27_strike_%281984%E2%80%931985%29

Wikipedia, I know ;)
red_pill 30th-Aug-2010 12:58 pm (UTC)
oh, i guessed that (cos, you know, thatcher a monster) i was wondering more where the leagual athority came to freeze the assetes of the NUM, although i too have given wiki a look, and it appares the NUM didnt pay a fine...and hide there assests. so the court froze everything.
x_butterfly19_x 30th-Aug-2010 01:09 pm (UTC)
It was a messy situation.
perfectisafault 30th-Aug-2010 07:26 pm (UTC)
Between this and shamelessly cozying up to some truly evil-ass people (oh hai Pinochet!), all I have to say is FUCK YOU THATCHER
octoberstarlite 31st-Aug-2010 08:52 am (UTC)
Another reason for me to shake with rage at the mention of her name.
This page was loaded May 19th 2013, 2:20 pm GMT.