ONTD Political

Homophobic Guys Are Probably Slightly Gay, Says Science

9:20 pm - 06/18/2011


The magazine Psychology Today reminded us of a 1996 University of Georgia study in which researchers took two groups of heterosexual men, one group identifying with homophobic claims and the other with more inclusive proclivities, attached their penises to devices that measure arousal, and then watched three types of porn: man-on-man, woman-on-woman, and then some old-fashioned hetero man-on-woman.

Not surprisingly, the study revealed that both groups were aroused while watching hetero and lesbian porn, but only admittedly homophobic participants were turned on by the gay porn.

I feel like this should be called the “No Shit” study. Or maybe the Bishop Eddie Long study. And if homophobia is an indication of deeper homosexual urges, then what does that say about Christian fundamentalists who so aggressively fight same-sex marriage? Are they the true face of gay America?

University of Georgia should now aim their penis meters at Newt Gingrich and Tracy Morgan and see how they react to man-on-man action.

But what I want to know, is if these participants in the study were self-proclaimed homophobes, then why would they agree to take a study that involved someone else fastening a device to their penis, and possibility a male scientist? I mean that sort of gives away the study right there, and before they even got down to the actual porn. A truly dedicated homophobe would never agree to a male scientist fiddling with their junk.

Death and Taxes Magazine
Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>
rex_dart 19th-Jun-2011 03:32 am (UTC)
This study sucks and the article sucks and I have the harddrive full of man-on-man porn to prove it. Suck my lesbian dick, Psychology Today.
lafinjack 19th-Jun-2011 03:35 am (UTC)
buh?
valencianbelle 19th-Jun-2011 03:34 am (UTC)
lol probs truefax...

I remember in high school I said I had gay friends and this girl literally MOVED her chair away from me.... now she's the most butch lesbian I know and the person I droll over Stacy Dash with. lol
alierakieron 19th-Jun-2011 03:40 am (UTC)
I know when *I* want reliable science reporting, I turn to "Death and Taxes" magazine.
lafinjack 19th-Jun-2011 03:44 am (UTC)
Heh, it was the best writeup I could find that mentioned both the study and that it was from 1996. The Psychology Today article doesn't mention the time lag, which is why I didn't just go with that one.
freebacon 19th-Jun-2011 03:45 am (UTC)
i think this was dis-proven awhile ago, if only because of the ridiculous statistics that were 'proven' in the study. (like, half of the population of men are secretly gay? um....?)

also don't cis-gendered dudes get boners from things aside from lust? like from emotions like hate, anger, and fear, etc?

also stop pinning homophobia on people who might be ~Secretly Gay~ and start pinning it on Straight Assholes and the Straight Society that we live in, you shitty magazine, god i hate this publication UGH
freebacon 19th-Jun-2011 03:46 am (UTC)
*this magazine referring to Psychology Today
ididthatonce 19th-Jun-2011 03:47 am (UTC)
OP, your icon plus this article is cracking my shit up.
lafinjack 19th-Jun-2011 03:50 am (UTC)
sephystabbity 19th-Jun-2011 03:48 am (UTC)
I have a pet peeve with this articles, merely because it is the only I see linked to when this particular discussion comes up, and I really want to see more (and more recent) studies.

And I have a personal problem with saying that homophobic people are just repressed homosexuals themselves.
sephystabbity 19th-Jun-2011 03:48 am (UTC)
*article

CURSE YOU SPELLING!
eveofrevolution 19th-Jun-2011 03:56 am (UTC)
How about we just say "some homophobes might have gay tendencies, and some might not. Some very open-minded people who identify as straight might also have gay tendencies, and some might not" and call it a day? Seriously, the results of this study do nothing but confuse the real issue of homophobia in today's society.

Edited at 2011-06-19 03:56 am (UTC)
lafinjack 19th-Jun-2011 03:59 am (UTC)
Nuance? On MY internets? Inconceivable!
rauduskoivu 19th-Jun-2011 03:58 am (UTC)
A truly dedicated homophobe would never agree to a male scientist fiddling with their junk.

This is really what it comes down to for me tbqfh.
chipuni 19th-Jun-2011 04:11 am (UTC)
How do you know it was a male scientist fiddling with their junk?


baked_goldfish 19th-Jun-2011 04:08 am (UTC)
Hasn't Psychology Today proved they're a little worthless, though?
romp 19th-Jun-2011 05:21 am (UTC)
Yeah, they're dead to me.
lafinjack 19th-Jun-2011 04:18 am (UTC)
thecityofdis 19th-Jun-2011 04:22 am (UTC)
or at least rename to Evolutionary Psychology Today

WE HAVE A WINNER.
poetic_pixie_13 19th-Jun-2011 04:18 am (UTC)
I am going to go way OT and demand an explanation from ladypolitik for this.

Edited at 2011-06-19 04:18 am (UTC)
poetic_pixie_13 19th-Jun-2011 04:19 am (UTC)
(Srsly, tho. I assume that tinypic's random url generator has given some of her old links to new photos, but still. Going through some of the old potd posts is quite amusing.)
thecityofdis 19th-Jun-2011 04:22 am (UTC)
I'm going to be over here, head desking.
lafinjack 19th-Jun-2011 04:44 am (UTC)
captaintrash 19th-Jun-2011 04:27 am (UTC)
While this study does sort of make me giggle with schadenfreude, I have to call bullshit on it. People get erections not just in situations where they're aroused by the content of what they're seeing, but when they're aroused by the taboo-ness of what they're seeing. Therefore, homophobes + seeing something they would consider "wrong" = shame boner. There.
zombieroadtrip 19th-Jun-2011 04:31 am (UTC)
Cool, more opportunities for straight people to foist the blame for society's prevalent heterosexism and homophobia on the gays themselves.

Don't think too hard about what you might be doing to contribute to a LGBT-hating society, that's silly.
jessilestrange 19th-Jun-2011 05:20 am (UTC)
Lol, Psychology Today pays little mind to ethics. It's why they're so ~revolutionary~
homasse 19th-Jun-2011 04:38 am (UTC)
LOL, PT. LOL.

Also, fun fact! Erections can also be a fear response. Just putting that out there.
sephystabbity 19th-Jun-2011 04:46 am (UTC)
Pretty much. People tend to ignore that fact, because it doesn't fit the argument half so well.
palsmarties 19th-Jun-2011 04:41 am (UTC)
Well glad to know truly straight people aren't homophobic at all.
angry_chick 19th-Jun-2011 04:50 am (UTC)
Shut the fuck up, Psychology Today.
kitschaster 19th-Jun-2011 05:01 am (UTC)
Fuck Psychology Today. Everything they post from now on is completely illegitimate. And this article is about just as BAD as posting the other gibberish they have posted before. FUCK PSYCHOLOGY TODAY. WHY DO PEOPLE READ THIS SHIT ANYMORE?!


Also, I had somebody push this article at me, to prove that all people who hate gays are just "closet cases", to which my fucking response was, "Thanks for furthering the assumption that gay people must obviously hate themselves so much". Ugh.

Edited at 2011-06-19 05:02 am (UTC)
fofomazuzu 19th-Jun-2011 05:01 am (UTC)
Oh wow, people get aroused during sexual situations. I am shocked and amazed.
lafinjack 19th-Jun-2011 05:04 am (UTC)
I automatically read that in Daria's voice for some reason.
etherealtsuki 19th-Jun-2011 05:19 am (UTC)
I know people are going 'lol Psychology Today' but it was a study (not evopsych either considering it deal with behavior not evolution) that actually popped up in one of my behavioral psych classes. It was a while back (like 2003 or so) but I dunno if it was rescinded or not. Psychology itself doesn't have it all down pat either.

(and the percentage was 25%, iirc).
shellazure 19th-Jun-2011 05:23 am (UTC)
Lol at the 'drill baby drill' tag.
lafinjack 19th-Jun-2011 05:29 am (UTC)
A+ would smirk again.
barnbat 19th-Jun-2011 06:14 am (UTC)
That study had a huge flaw that tends to get forgotten in conversation and crappy articles like this. There was no way to know if the arousal was of a sexual nature, and even the researchers admitted that. An angry/upset type emotional response would produce the same reaction on the penis, so the results were meaningless. The penile reaction observed is exactly what should be expected from 100% straight and homophobic guys having a bad negative emotional reaction, so they could just as easily simply be homophobic and unattracted to guys as they could be homophobic and secretly attracted.

A lot of bigotry is about ignorance and how someone was taught and socialized. Anti-semites and racists don't generally turn out to be secretly jewish or secretly bi-racial.
daut 19th-Jun-2011 06:50 am (UTC)
Actually, in Russia at least there have been antisemitic nationalists that hide (or try to) their Jewish heritage
lizzy_someone 19th-Jun-2011 07:10 am (UTC)
Yeeeaaahhhh, sitting this one out.
sparkindarkness 19th-Jun-2011 11:36 am (UTC)
Phallometric testing is the most bullshit thing ever - we've seen this time and time and time again with the immigration arseholes who try to force this

It's amazing the random things that can get people hard. And it's amazing how something that is super sexy woin't get us hard in the wrong conditions (I would say first among them being in a room with a machine wired to my penis. That's certainly not encouraging the sexy times right there)

And of course, all homophobes are admitted phobes, yeah?


Another typical attempt to try and blame gay people for homophobia
Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>
This page was loaded May 25th 2013, 12:49 am GMT.