ONTD Political

I'm half-black, and I'm opposed to race-based hiring. But after years of struggling in Hollywood, I gave it a try


BY LONI STEELE SOSTHAND


I do not look black. I know this to be true not just because I own a mirror, but also because others often tell me when I reveal my mixed race heritage. People seem compelled to comment as if blackness, were it real, would have left a more visible mark.

I am a television writer in Hollywood, and when I told my agent that my father is black and my mother is Jewish, he said, "You mean the man you call your father."

"Yes, well, I call him my father because he is my father."

"Your biological father?"

"Yes. As far as I know."

But it wasn't long before my agent saw this autobiographical detail as a possible opportunity. "How do you feel about me using that when I pitch you?"


I recalled this conversation as we were coming up on staffing season, the few months each spring when writers are hired to work on TV shows for the fall. It's always been a cutthroat time, but particularly so these days, with staffs on scripted shows smaller since the writer's strike three years ago, and the boom in reality TV continuing unabated. With experienced staff writers flooding the market, there's only a few coveted slots for newbie writers to catch a break -- and often those are diversity positions.

For those unfamiliar with TV staffing, the networks have initiatives that require most shows to set aside one staff position for a writer of diverse descent. The diversity hire is often the only writer on staff whose salary does not come out of the show's budget, but is paid by the network (provided for by the diversity program itself). Producers are more likely to take a chance on an untested writer when it's not on their dime.

So: Did I mind my agent using my race to get me in the door? This was a more loaded question than he could have realized.

My black father, my genetic claim to any diversity-related loot, is a conservative writer who has written many polemics against race-based preferences. Though his politics may seem unconventional for a black man these days, he sees himself as loyal to the founding principles of the civil rights movement that fought for individuals and against the evils of racism. He sees affirmative action policies that value race above individual achievement, no matter how well-meaning, as dehumanizing to the very people they are meant to help.

I agree with him.

Furthermore, the sheer fact that I look white highlights an underlying absurdity of affirmative action. Yes, people on both sides of my family have been oppressed (my mother's parents were Holocaust survivors), but I have never experienced oppression. So I don't feel entitled to any reparation. No box accurately addresses my identity anyhow.

My ideals were so puritanical that, just out of college, I proudly turned down a diversity-based writing job on a TV game show. But that was before the years I spent waitressing and part-time teaching while laboring away on a now aborted autobiographical novel. This and other career setbacks humbled me to the point where my modest writing goal is simply to finish what I start.

There is a saying that the hardest work you'll do in Hollywood is to get the job. After years of writing scripts on spec, I didn't want to stand in my own way.

But I also wondered if I'd been too quick to receive my father's wisdom. My dad's views against race-based preferences were so firmly established and so eloquently articulated that I agreed long before I had any personal experience to reference. Now I wanted to know for myself.

So, in response to my agent's request, I agreed to let him use my race as a selling point. Well, actually I said, "You can try, but I'm not sure it's going to work."

Because I have lived with this disconnect between my looks and my racial heritage all of my life, I foresaw trouble. I was right to worry. Here is what mostly happened: My agent pitched me on the phone as a diversity candidate, but once at the meetings my appearance confused people.

"Your father must be very light-skinned," one executive said.

When I told another that my paternal grandparents were interracially married in the 1940s, having met as founding members of CORE (Congress of Racial Equality), she said, "So really, you are only a quarter black. You have more white blood than black blood."

Talk of black blood and skin color in a job interview for a sitcom?

Given the fact that I look white, I am not used to my race taking precedence over my individuality. But it seems that by opting to be a diversity candidate, I had signed up to experience just this sort of absurdity. I felt invisible, and in that way I was initiated into a common black American experience
.

Was this the sort of dehumanization my father didn't want me to know firsthand?


In Hollywood everyone "loves" you. Then there is a "but." After meetings these "buts" came back to me through my agent. "He loved you. But he said you were different than he expected." "They loved you. But they decided to go with another diversity candidate." "She loved you. But she didn't think you seemed like a comedy writer."

Likely I hadn't seemed like a comedy writer in that particular meeting because I was so set on arguing my racial authenticity that I had waded into a morass of family history involving both the civil rights movement and the Holocaust -- not typical sitcom material.

But my agent didn't know that, and he offered me some tips. Wear jeans, he said, an ironic T-shirt, and buy some stylish frames. No matter that I don't need glasses. "You have to make them see you as the stereotype of a comedy writer," he said. We both laughed.

But his use of the word "stereotype" jarred me. Did I have to be a stereotype in order to get hired?

I thought there must be a way to be a diversity candidate while still holding onto my individual integrity. After all, with grandparents who were Orthodox Jewish immigrants from Poland who had narrowly escaped Hitler's concentrations camps only to end up in Stalin's labor camps in Siberia; grandparents who were civil rights workers interracially married when such marriages were rare and illegal; parents who had an interracial and interfaith marriage; and a black father with conservative politics, diversity was an integral part of my individuality. I had been formed in its crucible. Though I'm sure my grandparents would have used the word "integration" to describe my fate.

Television executives would be hard-pressed to find a more culturally complex writer. To forge ahead, I reasoned that in a creative business like television there was also an artistic rationale for diversity. Perhaps they were really looking for a writer fluent in a variety of cultures.

I could boast familial ease with characters from various ethnic backgrounds. Indeed, the character mixes in my writing samples demonstrate a cultural mélange that comes naturally given my upbringing. My main characters are minorities who cut against stereotype. Such characters are easy to imagine when your father is a cultural oxymoron: black conservative.

So I altered my shtick. I talked about family members as a source of inspiration for diverse characters. I gave examples of how my mixed heritage gives me a strong sense of irony, particularly when it comes to race. I mentioned that the family I grew up in not only had racial, but religious and political diversity as well. Furthermore, the man I married, in a reformed Jewish ceremony, is black, from Texas, and comes from a line of Christian, gun-toting, self-described Cajun cowboys. If the word "diversity" holds any meaning, I presented my writing and myself as its embodiment.

But it didn't work.

Race is not a talent. Race is not a skill. Race is not an insight. Likely this is why I couldn't successfully pitch it as such.

As I was leaving my house to meet with a V.P. of diversity for one of the major networks, my husband joked with me. "Here, try this," he said, and tossed me a jar of black shoe polish.

Of course I would never, but his joke about blackface seemed to echo the fake glasses my agent suggested -- a way to pass for a stereotype.

TV scripts are driven by a main character who wants something specific that she can’t get. All of her failed attempts to get this something make up the plot of the episode. When her failed attempts are sad, it makes for tragedy. When her failed attempts are really sad, it makes for comedy.

When I look back, I have to laugh at my failed attempts to be hired as a diversity writer.

Sour grapes? Perhaps, a little. But the process confirmed my suspicions about the dehumanizing aspects of affirmative action. Even if I had gotten hired, would it have been OK for somebody to inquire about the color of my father's skin in an interview for a sitcom, or to point out the ratio of white blood to black blood coursing through my veins?

As diverse as I am, I couldn't seem to make myself over as a diversity candidate. I couldn't be the stereotype they wanted.

But I'm still out here in the fight. I'm still writing scripts with characters from all kinds of racial backgrounds. Call it diversity, if you like. But I'm just writing what I know.

****

Source.

I still find it incredibly appalling how racist Hollywood really is. You'd think I'd learn not to be surprised by now. 
Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>
sesmo 7th-Aug-2011 07:15 am (UTC)
If Ms. Steele couldn't get hired as a white Jewish writer, maybe she just doesn't have what it takes. Blaming it on the stereotypes of diversity (or whatever the hell she's blaming it on) is kind of sad. Also, the HR/Diversity folks are kind of right that she's not the target of AA. She grew up upper middle class, went to Harvard and got an MFA at UC Irvine, and thought of herself and passed as white her whole life.
ebertrules 7th-Aug-2011 02:06 pm (UTC)
i agree. AA wasn't created for people of her background. jfc.
tiddlywinks103 7th-Aug-2011 07:37 am (UTC)
I don't like this article or writer. I think it's the privileged dismissal of AA, and its ramifications that did it for me.

And her stating that "race is not an insight". I mean, wtf? It's easy for her to dismiss because it seems like she's been able to pass as white her whole life.

And yes, HW is crazy racist, stereotyping and sleazy. And this article doesn't really help give insight into that, imo.
fauxparadiso 7th-Aug-2011 10:45 am (UTC)
Sounds like another case of "It Didn't Work For Me, So The System Is Bad!".
missingalphabet 7th-Aug-2011 11:21 am (UTC)
meangirlsshutup.gif

She didn't get a job as a POC candidate because she looks white to everyyone, which means she doesn't get discriminated against for not being white so she writes a self-affirming article to complain about it making her sound white, too. Amazing.

She can go right back to getting rejected for all the non-diversity jobs if she feels that's more humanizing. Since she reads white, she'll have the comfort of knowing she got rejected because she sucks whereas someone who doesn't read white will be left with the (dehumanizing) feeling of getting rejected because they're not white.
roseofjuly 8th-Aug-2011 01:18 am (UTC)
It's not just because she looks white - it's because she's lived as a white person her entire life and has no insight into what it means to be a racial minority in the US (perhaps an ethnic one with her Jewish identity). And she's stupid enough to think that diversity candidates and AA were just created to get some black blood into the studio and not to add a variety of experiences. What do you bring that every other white writer doesn't?
menkui 7th-Aug-2011 12:30 pm (UTC)
If her scripts are written as poorly as this essay I understand why she hasn't been hired.
starsinshapes 7th-Aug-2011 12:59 pm (UTC)
She says she's writing what she knows, but I'm curious as to what that is exactly.
homasse 7th-Aug-2011 01:46 pm (UTC)
Something about this both a) left a bad taste in my mouth and b) left me certain that the reason she can't get a writing job has nothing t do with her ethnicity.
lickety_split 7th-Aug-2011 07:02 pm (UTC)
MAYBE HER BRINGING UP THAT SHE LOOKS AND LIVES LIKE A WHITE WOMAN (while complaining about not getting the ~benefits of blackness~) IN EVERY OTHER SENTENCE LEFT THE BAD TASTE IN YOUR MOUTH.
bestdaywelived 7th-Aug-2011 01:48 pm (UTC)
They wanted someone who didn't read as white, so yeah, I guess you didn't fit the "stereotype". She seems like a shitty writer, so I'm not shocked by any of her struggles wrt hiring.
keeni84 7th-Aug-2011 01:58 pm (UTC)

Furthermore, the sheer fact that I look white highlights an underlying absurdity of affirmative action. Yes, people on both sides of my family have been oppressed (my mother's parents were Holocaust survivors), but I have never experienced oppression. So I don't feel entitled to any reparation. No box accurately addresses my identity anyhow.


http://www.wcfia.harvard.edu/sites/default/files/2007_27_Hochschild.pdf

It angers me when a light-skinned person with black heritage shits on Affirmative Action and has this like...disconnect between the things they're allowed to do and the things darker skinned black people aren't allowed to do.

It's so fucking infuriating.

No box accurately describes anybody. And everyone has a complex family history. That's not what makes her a good or bad writer.

I bet everyone could see right through her and her phony "diverse" family.
lickety_split 7th-Aug-2011 07:04 pm (UTC)
SHE'S A WHITE WOMAN THOUGH, AFFIRMATIVE ACTION SHOULD BE RIGHT UP HER ALLEY.
angelofdeath275 7th-Aug-2011 02:03 pm (UTC)
cry moar. Completely ignorant of how race is in America, not going to bother lamenting for her.
ebertrules 7th-Aug-2011 02:09 pm (UTC)
what an awful read. i'm so glad she was rejected from taking the position of an actual black person who identifies as such.
angelofdeath275 7th-Aug-2011 02:12 pm (UTC)
god imagine the face of an actual black person who ended up seeing the "diversity candidate".
carminaburana 7th-Aug-2011 02:31 pm (UTC)
The writer seems to miss the bigger "fail" in the story.
carminaburana 7th-Aug-2011 02:34 pm (UTC)
Also I wonder if her father is Shelby Steele.
odysseuslives 7th-Aug-2011 02:34 pm (UTC)
I agree with a lot of what other people are saying, I don't think affirmative action is there to help people like her. Perhaps she should've taken the job she was offered just out of school to get some writing credit.

Either way though, Hollywood really does have racist issues, and hearing that their discussions went down the "how black are you?" road is kind of... disquieting? It's kind of eck to sit around and discuss how much of a certain race someone is.
menkui 7th-Aug-2011 02:44 pm (UTC)
It's kind of eck to sit around and discuss how much of a certain race someone is.

I don't know if this is something every minority goes through. I know as a mixed person I always have people trying to figure out what I am and how much of something I am or telling me to my face what they know I am (I had a guy tell me I was Chinese, no if ands or buts about it). I think this is what her essay should have focused on. In fact, I kind of feel like affirmative action was used as a gimmick to grab the attention of readers. In short, I feel her on the whole people trying to fit you into a box, it's something we mixed people probably feel more acutely than others, but everything else about this essay is so bad that message gets lost in the mix.
ladypolitik 7th-Aug-2011 02:48 pm (UTC)
I, too, want to experience getting paid to write an article on which the entire thesis premise is "WOOOOSH!!!".
rex_dart 7th-Aug-2011 06:11 pm (UTC)
We all know you'd write it about the wind blowing through Fabio's hair.
ellenel13 7th-Aug-2011 03:33 pm (UTC)
I'm a very light skinned WOC. I believe the census worker at school called me "white Hispanic".

This lady should STFU about AA, especially since light-skinned people like us are likely to benefit from it a lot more than darker-skinned POC.

She probably didn't get hired because her writing sucks balls.
karikinetic 7th-Aug-2011 03:48 pm (UTC)
I read this last night and wanted to punch her in the face and ban her from a keyboard for the rest of her life.
door 7th-Aug-2011 04:59 pm (UTC)
...there's still time! ;D
etherealtsuki 7th-Aug-2011 04:48 pm (UTC)
My black father, my genetic claim to any diversity-related loot, is a conservative writer who has written many polemics against race-based preferences. Though his politics may seem unconventional for a black man these days, he sees himself as loyal to the founding principles of the civil rights movement that fought for individuals and against the evils of racism.

Then your father completely ignored that most (if not all) Civil Rights leaders supported AA.

I am fucking tired of people bitching about AA and how "unfair" it is. Instead she should be looking into the issue that it seems that you have to be a "diversity candidate" to even GET hired in Hollywood as a very HUGE problem. That tells you right fucking there that this belief of 'merit' can send you though is largely bullshit. Your skin color still fucking matters to them, whether you are more than qualified or not. AA exist because it give POCs and other minorities a fucking fighting chance against it.

AA is not giving POC a head start, it's about equalizing the head start that Whites already have.

Yes, it's gross that if you don't look like the stereotypical POC because you're mixed that suddenly you're not POC but at the same time you are using passing privilege your whole line and without learning that light-skinned people do get a certain privilege over dark-skinned, and the lighter, the better.
thenakedcat 7th-Aug-2011 07:26 pm (UTC)
This piece brings up the same issue as the "conservative feminists" article a couple days ago: civil rights movements succeed or fail on the basis of collective action, because they are responding to collective inequities. Putting emphasis instead on individual achievement allows people to ignore how structural inequities shape the possibility for achievement.
schmanda 7th-Aug-2011 05:44 pm (UTC)
Can't say I'm terribly surprised at the "color of your father's skin" and "oh, so you're only a quarter black" racism. Like any other elite, insular institution, I'd have to imagine that those within it get their heads so far up their own asses that they don't realize/care about the ramifications of what they're doing or saying. (See also: our policy makers)

Doesn't excuse it, but good fucking luck trying to effect any change.
schmanda 7th-Aug-2011 05:54 pm (UTC)
That said, the word that kept running through my mind throughout is "disingenuous."
amyura 7th-Aug-2011 05:52 pm (UTC)
Anyone else find it ironic that she's already benefiting from a completely different kind of preference program? Her dad's famous and they're rich, and she had access to education at elite schools-- that already opens a LOT more doors than any AA program could, and yet she begrudges the intended beneficiaries any preference that AA might give them.
captain_emily 7th-Aug-2011 11:16 pm (UTC)
I noticed that, too. Though I seriously doubt that it ever even crossed the author's mind.
elobelia 7th-Aug-2011 06:08 pm (UTC)
So if a team is hiring 5 writers and only one of those is a "diversity writer," shouldn't she be glad that she has a bigger chance of getting one of those 4 "white" slots rather than the one token "POC" slot? I mean, I know that technically ANYONE could occupy those other slots, but let's face it. They're gonna be white.
roseofjuly 8th-Aug-2011 01:43 am (UTC)
But that's the thing - idiots with their heads so far up their asses who think AA is "unfair" fail to recognize that the odds are on their side. I see this all the time in the arguing about college admissions and how unfaaaaaaaair it is that minorities get a leg up in admissions, and then I point out that blacks and Latinos usually make up 10-15% COMBINED of the college population they are referring to (when we're about 30-40% of the population of the US) and recruited athletes, development cases, alumni children and other white silver-spoon-in-their-mouths kids make up a FAR greater share of the pop than we do.
maynardsong 7th-Aug-2011 06:12 pm (UTC)
This is some pretty terrible, incoherent writing and I have no idea what in the actual fuck this writer's actually arguing. I had to go to the comments to try to make sense of it. But she sounds kind of like this white girl I know who insists that she isn't white 'cause her dad's (extremely light skinned) black and she has some Hispanic ancestor somewhere.
nerdanel 7th-Aug-2011 06:24 pm (UTC)
Sigh. I love the comment fail in this thread. Many of the commenters, who are (100%) white, are happily rejecting a mixed-race viewpoint out of hand, because it doesn't fit with their preconceived view about how POC should feel or the "POC experience." Meanwhile, because this woman is apparently not winning the Oppression Olympics, her writing is disparaged, she is deemed to know nothing, etc. All because her skin color is apparently not quite brown enough, her diverse experiences not diverse enough, for her to be allowed to disagree with affirmative action..

As a very noticeably brown/non-white POC (0% white blood here, not that that should matter in the least) from a lower-middle class background who is very ambivalent about affirmative action, I find this comment thread to be repulsive.
nerdanel 7th-Aug-2011 06:25 pm (UTC)
Also, by the way, the piece is completely clear and coherent. Perhaps it is the reading skills of the commenters that are "incoherent," rather than the initial piece itself.
lickety_split 7th-Aug-2011 07:21 pm (UTC)
When keepin' it real goes wrong!

So in a nutshell, a horrible writer who apparently never thought about race until well into adulthood, and who also benefited effortlessly from a lifetime of White Privilege, came to the conclusion that it was NOT FAIR that no one would hire so she decided to dig into her Bag of Tricks and allowed her agent to market her as something even she knew she wasn't(for numerous reasons) in a last-ditch effort to get her hired based on Affirmative Action..... which she's learned the hard way doesn't actually work for black people.

This story is beautiful. It's like an Aesop's Fable where the fox gets hit in the head with a piece of fruit and walks away hungry.
angry_chick 7th-Aug-2011 10:03 pm (UTC)
I know.

She's a prime example of "You lost the game."
fatpie42 7th-Aug-2011 07:35 pm (UTC)
I was surprised by the ending. The intro had given me the impression that she was going to be hired as a diversity candidate even though she was white. That really WOULD make a mockery of affirmative action.

She seems to expect us all to be shocked that she wasn't picked for a job in spite of being white. Am I to understand that she thinks affirmative action is awful unless it gets her a job? *shrugs*
fishphile 7th-Aug-2011 07:39 pm (UTC)
I do wonder what this essay would have been like if she had been hired. Would it have still been a rant against AA? Or would it have been like the only good AA hire is mine?
vanillakokakola 7th-Aug-2011 09:43 pm (UTC)
He sees affirmative action policies that value race above individual achievement, no matter how well-meaning, as dehumanizing to the very people they are meant to help.

I agree with him.


sooo, this isn't what AA is about at all. it's about trying to promote equality in a world where POC won't even get a callback for a job because the name on their resume isn't white enough, among other things.
etherealtsuki 7th-Aug-2011 11:53 pm (UTC)
For real. What I find dehumanizing is that, without AA, is it pretty likely that I would never get a good job ever regardless of my 'merits'.

Not that some hiring managers don't serve around AA anyway and only hire POC when their workplace is basically all White and people starting to call on their shit.

It reminds me of reading this conversation on the internet with White men BAWWWWWing on how unfair one company is turning down 'well qualified White vets' because they were hiring POC vets (who are suddenly can't do the job because you know that company would put their profits to risk and there's no well qualified POC workers ever). Until someone had to point that it's it fishy that it means they weren't hiring POC vets in the first place?

Fucking seriously.
Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>
This page was loaded May 21st 2013, 4:20 pm GMT.