Generators Taken From New York's 'Occupy Wall Street' Protesters
Chris Francescani and Michelle Nichols
Saturday, 29 October 2011
Anti-Wall Street protesters' plans to camp in a New York park throughout the city's harsh winter were dealt a blow yesterday when the fire department confiscated generators and fuel because they posed a danger.
With the first snow forecast to fall today, the Occupy Wall Street movement against economic inequality lost the generators that had been powering heat, computers and a kitchen in the Lower Manhattan camp they set up six weeks ago.
"They think that taking the 'power' away will take the power away, and that's absolutely not true at all," said Occupy Wall Street spokesman Michael Booth.
Unlike protesters elsewhere in the country, who rallied in city parks which typically have a curfew at night, those in New York set up camp in a privately-owned park open to the public 24 hours a day and cannot be removed unless the owner, Brookfield Office Properties, officially complains to the city.
New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg said the six generators and fuel were confiscated because they were considered a safety hazard and it was not a bid to remove protesters.
"As long as they don't take away anybody else's rights to say what they want to say, or to not say anything, to go about their business safely ... at the moment it will continue," Bloomberg told local radio.
Some analysts said that Bloomberg's strategy toward the protesters was simple - contain them and ensure there is no violence like that seen in Oakland, where former US Marine Scott Olsen was badly injured in clashes with police.
"Everything is about containing it, if it goes on for a long time they are prepared. Let them live and be well and it will come to an end," said political strategist Hank Sheinkopf. "The strategic move is not to have violence."
Ken Sherrill, a professor of political science at Hunter College in New York, said any kind of conflict would be bad for the city's image and that Bloomberg was no doubt hoping that the protest would fade as the weather worsened.
"That doesn't mean that the mayor wants to make life easy for the demonstrators," he said. "Other than perhaps ratcheting up the inconveniences, there's not going to be anything more intense and I think that would be ill-conceived anyway."
But Occupy Wall Street spokesman Ed Needham said the removal of the generators was "certainly a directed effort to thwart our situation." He said solar powered generators were being brought in to replace those taken.
"It makes us feel like this is a confrontational relationship between the city and the park, and that's not the type of relationship we're trying to foster," Needham said. "We'll do just fine this winter. Our volunteers are as creative and resourceful as they are committed."
A possible showdown between Occupy Wall Street and New York police was averted two weeks ago when Brookfield Office Properties postponed a cleanup of the area, which protesters feared was a bid to remove them.
Source.
Allow me to express my feelings on this is gif format.
Chris Francescani and Michelle Nichols
Saturday, 29 October 2011
Anti-Wall Street protesters' plans to camp in a New York park throughout the city's harsh winter were dealt a blow yesterday when the fire department confiscated generators and fuel because they posed a danger.
With the first snow forecast to fall today, the Occupy Wall Street movement against economic inequality lost the generators that had been powering heat, computers and a kitchen in the Lower Manhattan camp they set up six weeks ago.
"They think that taking the 'power' away will take the power away, and that's absolutely not true at all," said Occupy Wall Street spokesman Michael Booth.
Unlike protesters elsewhere in the country, who rallied in city parks which typically have a curfew at night, those in New York set up camp in a privately-owned park open to the public 24 hours a day and cannot be removed unless the owner, Brookfield Office Properties, officially complains to the city.
New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg said the six generators and fuel were confiscated because they were considered a safety hazard and it was not a bid to remove protesters.
"As long as they don't take away anybody else's rights to say what they want to say, or to not say anything, to go about their business safely ... at the moment it will continue," Bloomberg told local radio.
Some analysts said that Bloomberg's strategy toward the protesters was simple - contain them and ensure there is no violence like that seen in Oakland, where former US Marine Scott Olsen was badly injured in clashes with police.
"Everything is about containing it, if it goes on for a long time they are prepared. Let them live and be well and it will come to an end," said political strategist Hank Sheinkopf. "The strategic move is not to have violence."
Ken Sherrill, a professor of political science at Hunter College in New York, said any kind of conflict would be bad for the city's image and that Bloomberg was no doubt hoping that the protest would fade as the weather worsened.
"That doesn't mean that the mayor wants to make life easy for the demonstrators," he said. "Other than perhaps ratcheting up the inconveniences, there's not going to be anything more intense and I think that would be ill-conceived anyway."
But Occupy Wall Street spokesman Ed Needham said the removal of the generators was "certainly a directed effort to thwart our situation." He said solar powered generators were being brought in to replace those taken.
"It makes us feel like this is a confrontational relationship between the city and the park, and that's not the type of relationship we're trying to foster," Needham said. "We'll do just fine this winter. Our volunteers are as creative and resourceful as they are committed."
A possible showdown between Occupy Wall Street and New York police was averted two weeks ago when Brookfield Office Properties postponed a cleanup of the area, which protesters feared was a bid to remove them.
Source.
Allow me to express my feelings on this is gif format.
You took their sources of power and HEAT, right as winter sets in.
But ...
New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg said the six generators and fuel were confiscated because they were considered a safety hazard and it was not a bid to remove protesters.
Sure, buddy. Sure. That's why you got pissed when you couldn't oust them to "clean" the plaza, too, right?
Some analysts said that Bloomberg's strategy toward the protesters was simple - contain them and ensure there is no violence like that seen in Oakland, where former US Marine Scott Olsen was badly injured in clashes with police.
... just because it wasn't as bad as Oakland doesn't mean your cops haven't already fucked up, bro.
That doesn't mean that the mayor wants to make life easy for the demonstrators
... Taking away a source of heat at the onset of winter isn't "causing an inconvenience", that's being a complete and outright dickhead.
But I'm sure it was just about the fire hazard.
WTF it's not even Halloween yet!
I'm going to need an explanation as to why the generators are a safety hazard, though.
ETA: And I just noticed your username, which is... funny is the wrong word... but it's SOMETHING considering this article.
Man I am being beyond inarticulate today. I hope you get what I mean!
Edited at 2011-10-30 02:29 am (UTC)
The comments on the article are full of HA HA WHO ISN'T BEING CHARITABLE NOW?! which I find to be troubling. I don't have much to add other than feeling frustrated that people don't realize that many homeless people have issues which non-doctors/specialists are qualified to handle...
its really sad we still have such a lack of resources for the homeless - even aside from OWS ... like, my dad was really sick, a few years ago - and I remember sitting in the ER waiting room - during the colder months (Nov./ Dec.) homeless people would come in - and like, obviously with problems other than just medical - but the police would come in and just take them outside to the streets.
I understand, there is only so much the hospitals can do ... but, how can we just be putting sick people on the street. how is that happening? it kills me. like, ugh. idk im just rambling/venting
Okay.
Good to know. I'm sure the EMS will thank you for their no doubt increased workload over the next month or two.
badly injured in clashes with policebadly injured when the police brutalized him.ftfy
(I've been wondering what the plans were in general for the occupations in northern cities once winter hit)
Riiiiiiight.
I thought there had been violence against protestors in NYC?
And I didn't know that was a privately owned park. I'm going to look up Brookfield now. Do you know anything about them by any chance?