ONTD Political

CNN Photojournalists Lose Jobs to Cheaper, Better Cameras

2:34 pm - 11/14/2011
CNN Photojournalists Lose Jobs to Cheaper, Better Cameras

CNN is passing out pink slips in their DC, New York, Atlanta, Miami and Los Angeles offices following a three-year long review of the company's workflow. Based on the wording of the internal memo sent out by CNN senior vice president Jack Womack, part of that analysis involved measuring the potential of leaning more heavily on the network's citizen journalism program, iReport:

We looked at the impact of user-generated content and social media, CNN iReporters and of course our affiliate contributions in breaking news. Consumer and pro-sumer technologies are simpler and more accessible. Small cameras are now high broadcast quality. More of this technology is in the hands of more people. After completing this analysis, CNN determined that some photojournalists will be departing the company.

Chris Ariens at TV Newser reports that "at least 50 positions are being eliminated [including] as many as 12 staffers in the Washington, DC bureau alone, four of whom are longtime photojournalists." These numbers pale in comparison to the mass layoffs of 2008, when CNN sacked its entire science, technology, and environment news staff, but it does throw a wrench into the resilient hope that citizen journalists aren't stealing jobs from professional journalists.

The full memo:

From: Womack, Jack
Sent: Friday, November 11, 2011 3:59 PM
To: *CNN ALL Cities ImageSound (TBS); *CNN ALL Cities Tech Ops
Subject: NOTE TO STAFF

For the past three years, we have been analyzing our work process across Image + Sound, both in the field and in our editing and production areas.

Our goal has been to make sure we have the right resources in the right places to meet the demands of all of our programs. Technology investments in our newsrooms now allow more desk-top editing and publishing for broadcast and online. This evolution allows more people in more places to edit and publish than ever before. As a result of these technology and workflow changes, CNN is reducing the number of media editors in our work force in Atlanta. CNN Image + Sound will continue with high end craft editing that has positive impact on our networks and platforms.

We also spent a great deal of time analyzing how we utilize and deploy photojournalists across all of our locations in the U.S. We looked at the evolution of daytime and evening line-ups. We analyzed how stories are assigned and more importantly the ratio of stories assigned that actually make it on to our networks or platforms. We know that we have to sharpen our focus on stories assigned to ensure that this great work gets on air. We looked at production demands, down time, and international deployments. We looked at the impact of user-generated content and social media, CNN iReporters and of course our affiliate contributions in breaking news. Consumer and pro-sumer technologies are simpler and more accessible. Small cameras are now high broadcast quality. More of this technology is in the hands of more people. After completing this analysis, CNN determined that some photojournalists will be departing the company.

We cannot begin to thank these individuals enough for their service to CNN. They leave with our respect and our sincere best wishes.

Now that we have completed this three-year review, we believe that we have the right resources in the right places and the proper staffing at Image + Sound, and that the unit is well-positioned to have an even more positive impact on our networks and platforms.

Jack
[info]echoandsway 14th-Nov-2011 06:08 am (UTC)
Consumer and pro-sumer technologies are simpler and more accessible. Small cameras are now high broadcast quality. More of this technology is in the hands of more people.

Having good-quality equipment doesn't ensure that the owners will produce good or memorable photographs. When it comes to anything artistic (which photojournalism is, however hybrid), there are intangibles that have nothing to do with technology.
[info]leprofessional 14th-Nov-2011 06:47 am (UTC)
I love photojournalists, but their jobs are becoming highly niche, and perhaps even irrelevant in the context of "news"... 20... heck even 10 years ago you'd need for a photojournalist/associated news crew to go in to document an event. But now everyone and their pet cat has a cell phone that can capture critical moments like no photojournalist could. Besides, the market is flooded with really damn good amateurs who are putting their work out there for free, because they can do so with the internet (whereas before, only a limited number of people had access to mass media)... thinking of the photos coming out of the Arab revolutions...
[info]advancedcookie 14th-Nov-2011 06:08 am (UTC)
Well this fucking sucks. [/photographer and filmmaker rage]

Edited at 2011-11-14 06:08 am (UTC)
[info]dixiedolphin 14th-Nov-2011 01:23 pm (UTC)
Ditto this.

It pisses me off to no end that these days the news media would rather con amateurs into giving up their photos & all rights to them for free than pay an actual skilled photographer to take high quality images. Same for goes for writers. That's why I despise the Huffington Post.
[info]donutsina6speed 14th-Nov-2011 01:29 pm (UTC)
*joins* /same type of rage
[info]fashionbabylon 14th-Nov-2011 06:37 am (UTC)
inb4 neo-luddism (uh oh maybe I was too late)
[info]leprofessional 14th-Nov-2011 06:43 am (UTC)
True... technological changes will render certain jobs irrelevant or make fewer positions available and people have to learn to adapt/innovate. It's always been the case, and now more so than ever. :/
[info]hinoema 14th-Nov-2011 06:53 am (UTC)
It's CNN, though. I can't see, for instance, National Geographic going that route.
[info]donutsina6speed 14th-Nov-2011 01:30 pm (UTC)
NatGeo probably won't. I think they're partnered with Nikon?
[info]mrasaki 14th-Nov-2011 07:50 am (UTC)
Are you serious? My experience with iReporting is a shaky handicam video of the latest car crash or fireball and someone going, OMG!!
[info]rex_dart 14th-Nov-2011 08:06 am (UTC)
But the point is that CNN is now finding it more viable to go with up-to-the-minute shaky handicam than sending professional photographers around the globe and inevitably not actually being there for 99% of breaking news when right when it's breaking the way non-professionals who actually live where the news is happening can be.

The only reason professional photojournalists used to be as necessary as they were is because there was no viable alternative to waiting for them to arrive at the scene and report back. Now there is.
[info]dixiedolphin 14th-Nov-2011 01:24 pm (UTC)
Exactly. Just because an amateur buys a fancy camera, it does not mean their photos and/or video is going to be quality. Not to mention that the average amateur has no idea what sort of ethical responsibilities and accountability are bundled up with proper photojournalism, too.
[info]bowtomecha 14th-Nov-2011 07:56 am (UTC)
Not related, but after following the source's other reports... Fox News's parent corp is run by Murddoch's corp? I didn't know this.
[info]intrikate88 14th-Nov-2011 04:04 pm (UTC)
Oh yeah. NewsCorp is everywhere.
[info]dahemo 14th-Nov-2011 10:21 am (UTC)
This is why I don't want to get into this kind of work, much as I like it.
[info]peace_piper 14th-Nov-2011 11:20 am (UTC)
Get into artistic photography now, I guess. Or put out your own books of photojournalism, like a project I'm doing about trash. *shrugs, idealess really*
[info]atomic_joe2 14th-Nov-2011 11:02 am (UTC)
I was wondering the other day when this sort of thing would happen what with the advent of high quality cameras on general sale years ago.
[info]fanfare 14th-Nov-2011 03:32 pm (UTC)
CNN determined that some photojournalists will be departing the company. We cannot begin to thank these individuals enough for their service to CNN. They leave with our respect and our sincere best wishes.

I hate this phrasing. I know it sucks to say "we decided some people are getting fired" but at least that way it doesn't sound like they had a say in it or something. "We were looking at stuff and we found out some of you are going somewhere else! Thanks, we love you and hope everything's great in the land of SOMEWHERE ELSE!! xoxoxox. By the way, we now have the RIGHT things in place and the PROPER staff; they'll work better now without you."

Shove it, CNN.
[info]lightningxsnow 14th-Nov-2011 03:39 pm (UTC)
The unemployment piece of this sucks, but I'm not sure having an art form be more accessible to the public is a bad thing. There's a huge difference between blurry iReport cellphone videos and professional-quality pictures taken by people who happen to not have formal training. Some of the best photographers I know are self-taught.
[info]intrikate88 14th-Nov-2011 04:10 pm (UTC)
Oh look, it's CNN treating employees as expendable shit.

I live in Atlanta and I know a few people who work with CNN (and of course, being unemployed, everybody is telling me to go work for them.) You have to know someone to get in, you have to work for shitty pay on the night shift for years before you get anywhere, and you have like no job security. Thanks, I'll give that a miss. This latest news is not surprising.
This page was loaded May 27th 2012, 3:35 pm GMT.