ONTD Political

Provocative Female Attire is an Assault Against Men

3:00 pm - 12/21/2011
Provocative Female Attire is an Assault Against Men
by Giovanni Dannato on November 1, 2011

When a woman walks down a crowded sidewalk in revealing clothing, she is forcing herself on every man nearby.

The woman fully understands the powerful biological drives of men. She knows they cannot ignore her, not even if they want to.

She has chosen to advertise herself to everyone passing by, but she is looking only for a few men. The wealthiest, the most famous, the most powerful men she can attract. Yet her display is bound to be noticed by hundreds of men in whom she has no conceivable romantic interest.

For her, advertising to the whole world is a no-brainer: you never know who might be watching. It’s perfectly well in her interests to flaunt herself. But what serves her needs is not necessarily good for others.


There’s an old elementary school custom…when you bring something tasty to class, it’s understood that you should put it away unless you intend to share it with others. The rationale:

* It’s a distraction to the entire class.
* The goodies are blatantly advertised without any possibility of fulfilling the promise of the advertisement for everyone.
* It’s considered impolite to show off what you don’t intend to share.

Likewise, a woman who puts her goodies blatantly on display is making false advertisements. Nobody supposes or expects that she could share herself with her entire audience—not even if she wanted to.

And this is where most women and white knights resort to the usual responses:

* “It’s a free country.”
* “It’s not against the law!”
* “You don’t have the right to restrict what I do with my body!”

However, looking for refuge in explicit written law is inherently disingenuous. As the more socially oriented sex, women know very well that most social rules are tacitly understood and rarely written down or spoken of.

These feminists and manginas completely miss the point and resort to a straw man. They suppose that their critics believe it should be illegal for women to dress provocatively! They fail to understand that the rule of law is hardly the only set of rules that binds us.

Somehow, they are unable to understand that women exposing themselves without intent to reciprocate the attention they attract is impolite and inconsiderate – an act of aggression in which they use the power of their sex as a weapon. They publicly and proudly demonstrate callous disregard towards others without the faintest understanding that common courtesy is a two-way street…

When I studied abroad in Latin America during college, I was in a group of students from my school that consisted mostly of spoiled women. They would insist on going out in low cut tops and become outraged when local men started catcalling at them.

Rather than sharing their sense of righteous indignation, I found myself hiding a smile. It didn’t take me long to understand that tastefully dressed women never received catcalls. This sort of behavior was reserved for women who broke their side of the social contract.

Back in the feminized West, I’d been well aware that the wolf whistle was one of the most despised and vilified of all possible male behaviors. And having actually experienced it in real life, I had a big red pill revelation.

Catcalling, I realized, was a defense mechanism used by lower status men against women flaunting themselves publicly – for the benefit of millionaires only. Feminists and their defenders have a special place in their hearts for this sort of retaliation. They are reminded of horrible days of yore when Western women actually had social responsibilities – when even ‘loser’ males they considered beneath them could resort to public shaming when pushed too far.

Present first world societies allow men no defense whatsoever against predatory and false female advertising. In every social venue, women are free to treat men as they like and should males reciprocate their wanton sexual displays with similarly crude and aggressive behavior, it’s called ‘sexual harassment.’

Thus men are effectively strapped down, gagged, and muzzled while females can flaunt and taunt with impunity. For many men this pretty much sums up every single day of an entire lifetime at school and at work.

Western Women don’t just abuse their incredible sexual power, they pathologically lie about their inability to understand the effects and implications of their actions. In fact, they seem to derive a sort of sociopathic pleasure from being able to sow unpleasantness and discord without consequence – all while playing innocent. They express their contempt and hatred for men even as they troll the populace for providers. Their enormous power comes without responsibility and they love it that way.

For those who would doubt for a moment that these women know exactly what they’re doing, let’s take a look a recent events. How do Western women collectively respond when some male displeases them?

In the most vengeful, derisive, and mocking way they know how.

They call it a ‘SlutWalk.’

-----

Source is also full of fat-shaming and Islamophobia

I am literally shaking with rage right now. Not bolding anything because every single sentence in this is disgusting and infuriating.

ALSO I DO NOT WANT TO SEE ANY WHAT ABOUT THE MEN COMMENTS. NOT THE PLACE.
Page 1 of 5
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] >>
summersdream 21st-Dec-2011 10:12 pm (UTC)
I HATE THIS COMMENT SYSTEM.

BUT I HATE THIS ARITCLE'S CONTENT MORE.
ms_mmelissa 21st-Dec-2011 10:51 pm (UTC)
LOL

A+
dumpweeds 21st-Dec-2011 10:14 pm (UTC)
No.
dumpweeds 21st-Dec-2011 10:14 pm (UTC)
(to the article, not you, OP)
liveonthesun 21st-Dec-2011 10:14 pm (UTC)
can we talk about the juxtaposition of this article with the "fat girl jihad" ad at the source?

because what the hell.
amara_1783 21st-Dec-2011 10:18 pm (UTC)
You mean this gem:

http://www.inmalafide.com/blog/2011/11/06/the-no-fat-chicks-challenge/

Because if so I'm not at the level of 'talk', I'm at the level of 'grab axe and SMITE'.
evewithanapple 21st-Dec-2011 10:14 pm (UTC)
*tilts head*

Is . . . is it a parody?
roseofjuly 22nd-Dec-2011 09:19 am (UTC)
Yeah, once I was halfway through I was like "This has to be satire. It's satire, right?"
abee 21st-Dec-2011 10:14 pm (UTC)
WAT.
executivehpfan 21st-Dec-2011 10:15 pm (UTC)
No no no no NO. Fuck this guy, seriously.
romp 22nd-Dec-2011 03:56 am (UTC)
co-signed
jei_corsair 21st-Dec-2011 10:16 pm (UTC)
U_U

I can't even right now.
squeeful 21st-Dec-2011 10:16 pm (UTC)
How about NO and FUCK YOU.
emuko 21st-Dec-2011 10:17 pm (UTC)
What the fuck.
kumagoro_usagi 21st-Dec-2011 10:17 pm (UTC)
This has probably have to be one of the most disgusting and sexist thing I ever have read in my life. I refrain from saying anymore, my hands are actually shaking with rage.
lickety_split 21st-Dec-2011 10:17 pm (UTC)
WARNING: DO NOT LOOK AT THE SOURCE
bushy_brow 21st-Dec-2011 10:19 pm (UTC)
Too late. *facepalm*
windsong_moon 21st-Dec-2011 10:18 pm (UTC)
FLAMES ON THE SIDE OF MY FACE. So much to comment on and such little time.
girly123 21st-Dec-2011 10:19 pm (UTC)
NO.
NO.
FUCK THIS. Fuck EVERYTHING ABOUT this.
benihime99 21st-Dec-2011 10:19 pm (UTC)
"The woman fully understands the powerful biological drives of men."
Implying that men are animals who can not control themseves?

Who is the author? Did he get dumped latetly or what?
More importantly does he have a functional brain?

hashishinahooka 21st-Dec-2011 11:12 pm (UTC)
Ooo... I think I just found one of the small percentage I'm flaunting for...
cuterabbit33 21st-Dec-2011 10:20 pm (UTC)
Provocative Female Attire is an Assault Against Men

And that's where I stopped.
ms_mmelissa 21st-Dec-2011 10:52 pm (UTC)
I stopped when the author compared a woman's body to "goodies" that a kid would bring into class that it would be impolite not to share.

JFC.
versusaurorae 21st-Dec-2011 10:21 pm (UTC)
I literally did this at the computer screen:


Additionally, ...men are effectively strapped down, gagged, and muzzled...

HEY I have that dream too, only mine also involves tazers.
sarken 22nd-Dec-2011 04:45 am (UTC)
HEY I have that dream too, only mine also involves tazers.

Laugh-snorted so loud I scared the cat.
ms_mmelissa 21st-Dec-2011 10:53 pm (UTC)
Yeah that whole "goodies to be shared" is so disgusting, I can't even.

Who the hell thinks that way about a person's body? D:
ailurus 21st-Dec-2011 10:22 pm (UTC)
Oh, wow. Fuck you (not you, OP).
spiegel11th 21st-Dec-2011 10:23 pm (UTC)
I WANT TO GO OUT AND PUNCH SOMETHING.
BUT I AM IN MY PJS.
SO I WILL HUG MY PUPPY AND CURSE THIS SHITGUZZLING MAGGOT-BRAINED SCUMBUCKET INSTEAD.
girly123 21st-Dec-2011 10:23 pm (UTC)
Also, fuck the people in the comments for trying to bring hijab into this. From what I've read, it's about letting men know that you're a woman of God so that they don't fuck with you, not "realizing the ways of women" and making them submit to men's will". (If there are other Muslimahs who had read differently, please let me know! I'm pretty new to the faith, but hijab is where I started learning).

Just. Fuck this, and fuck the people in the comments section.
benihime99 21st-Dec-2011 10:31 pm (UTC)
Have some mulled wine and make me some too.
This is a "they don't deserve to live one this planet" talk
gr_julian 21st-Dec-2011 10:27 pm (UTC)
My body is not a fucking cupcake.
eyetosky 22nd-Dec-2011 12:20 am (UTC)
THIS X10000000000

Probably boiled my thoughts down the most condensed form. I am not a commodity to be consumed.
xochitl 21st-Dec-2011 10:28 pm (UTC)
"When a woman walks down a crowded sidewalk in revealing clothing, she is forcing herself on every man nearby."

Aaaaaaaaaaand that's where I stopped reading.
jei_corsair 21st-Dec-2011 10:42 pm (UTC)
Yep. Me too. I tried to scan over other parts of the article, but it made me so angry I couldn't process much else.
its_anya 21st-Dec-2011 10:30 pm (UTC)
For some reason, reading the 'about' section of that site helped me to calm down. Knowing that it's a site for self-proclaimed misogynists, racists, bigots, homophobes, and marginalised white nationalists (poor diddums), I feel reassured that this chap is part of the nutjob fringe and that he is doomed to spend a life wanking to "fat jihad" pictures in his mother's basement, and that his seething hatred will probably cause him to develop high blood pressure.

*zen expression*
shechoselove 21st-Dec-2011 11:01 pm (UTC)
That was my thought, too. The "About" section almost read like a parody. If only that's what it were...
Page 1 of 5
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] >>
This page was loaded May 18th 2013, 10:35 pm GMT.