ONTD Political

Thirty Fortune 500 Companies Paid More to Lobby Congress than they Did in Federal Income Taxes

6:17 pm - 01/19/2012
Thirty Fortune 500 Companies Paid More to Lobby Congress than they Did in Federal Income Taxes

With the second anniversary approaching of the Supreme Court’s decision in the Citizens United case – which opened the floodgates to corporate spending on elections – U.S. Public Interest Research Group (U.S. PIRG) and Citizens for Tax Justice reveal 30 corporations that spent more to lobby Congress than they did in taxes.

The report, Representation without Taxation: Fortune 500 Companies that Spend Big on Lobbying and Avoid Taxes, takes a close look at one area where corporate power and influence is on full display: corporate tax policy. By exploiting loopholes and special provisions in the tax code, 280 consistently profitable Fortune 500 companies paid about half the statutory corporate tax rate while spending $2 billion to lobby Congress on tax policy and other issues. The report also looks at the “Dirty Thirty” particularly aggressive tax avoiders that spent more on federal lobbying than income taxes between 2008 and 2010. Twenty-nine of these corporations actually received a net tax rebate during the three year period of the study.

The report takes a deeper look at one of the most egregious ways corporations skirt taxes – by shifting profits legitimately earned in America to offshore tax havens, where they are subject to little, if any taxes. At least 22 of the thirty companies studied had subsidiaries in tax haven countries.

“Corporations should not be able to shirk their tax burden by using gimmicks to game the tax code,” said Dan Smith, U.S. PIRG Tax and Budget Associate, who co-authored the report. “When corporations don’t pay, ordinary taxpayers and responsible small businesses are left to pick up the tab. The fact that so many corporations can spend more money lobbying than they pay in taxes makes a mockery of our tax code and our democracy.”

The “Dirty Thirty” companies all told made $163.7 billion in profits while paying zero dollars in federal income taxes and collecting a total of $10.6 billion in various tax rebates. Meanwhile, they collectively spent $475.7 million in lobbying expenses for the three year period.

“On the second anniversary of Citizens United, corporate tax dodging should be seen as a cautionary tale. In the wake of that disastrous decision, special interest influence will only continue to grow and policy will reflect that unless we get corporate money out of elections,” added Blaire Bowie, U.S. PIRG Democracy Advocate.

At the release of the report, Congressman Michael Capuano, a leader in campaign finance reform, opened by saying “Citizens United is terribly wrong and it undermines the democratic system.”

"Large majorities of Americans say corporations pay too little in taxes, and yet Congress has not voted to close corporate tax loopholes," said CTJ director Robert McIntyre.

"Many lawmakers insist that there is a budget crisis and that Americans must sacrifice some of the essential public services they depend on. But Congress has yet to make sure corporations pay their fair share in taxes. The most plausible explanation for this inaction is the power of corporate money in politics. Campaign contributions and highly-paid lobbyists give corporate executives a louder voice than the millions and millions of working families who wonder why they pay more in taxes than GE, Boeing, Wells Fargo, Verizon, and dozens of other huge, profitable corporations, all put together," he added.

For a copy of the report, visit: http://uspirg.org/representation-without-taxation

Here is a list of the Dirty Thirty, taken from the report:



Source
angelus7988 19th-Jan-2012 11:47 pm (UTC)
Well, they're still contributing to the government, donchyaknow!
kitanabychoice 19th-Jan-2012 11:50 pm (UTC)
Wow, I was almost surprised to see DTE Energy on this list but they're pretty shitty overall so it makes sense they'd be on this list, doing dirt. -_-
13chapters 19th-Jan-2012 11:51 pm (UTC)
PG&E probably has a LOT of lobbying to do after they killed eight people and blew up a bunch of houses in San Bruno a couple years ago.

Fuckers.
coolster 19th-Jan-2012 11:58 pm (UTC)
OMG, how have I never heard of this?!
13chapters 20th-Jan-2012 12:10 am (UTC)
idk? I was in Michigan at the time, and I def heard about it, but I might have also paid closer attention because I'm from the Bay Area.
shananagems 19th-Jan-2012 11:58 pm (UTC)
american electric power, why am I not shocked.
forwhataim 20th-Jan-2012 01:09 am (UTC)
I'm sleep deprived so I need help. Does that table say that FedEx is the only company in the "Dirty 30" that actually paid taxes? I see many negative numbers and I can't process them at all. Is it just denial?

So many utility companies . . . so many monopolies?



kyra_neko_rei 20th-Jan-2012 05:08 am (UTC)
It looks like exactly that. Methinks we could afford to drop a few subsidies here.
mikya 20th-Jan-2012 06:48 am (UTC)
Yes, but don't think too highly of them, they paid 37 million on profit of 4.2 billion, an effective tax rate of less than 1%.
hinoema 20th-Jan-2012 11:35 am (UTC)
Remember, too, that this is PROFIT. The actual income is far greater. If that actual income were subject to a fair, proportionate tax, the Government would have too much money to spend.
atlanta_charmer 20th-Jan-2012 02:34 am (UTC)
Once I saw the list most of the names didn't surprise me.
nikoel 23rd-Jan-2012 11:28 pm (UTC)
The only problem about closing these damn loopholes and making corporations pay their share is that they'd likely take it out on the employees. More layoffs, lower wages, bare minimum benefits, etc. We'd have more money for welfare, but also way more people on it and an even smaller middle class than we already do. Plus consumers would be charged more for the products, getting us deeper and deeper into the mess we're in now. I definitely want the government to have more money, but it seems that the repercussions could be disastrous. I'm no economist, so I'm probably missing something here, but it's all so confusing and scary. I guess more regulations would help?

/thinking out loud
This page was loaded May 21st 2013, 6:46 am GMT.