ONTD Political

GOP's Wet Dream: Censoring Reality!

1:54 am - 02/14/2012
Finally, We Can Censor that Potty Mouth Webster and His Obscene Dictionaries (and His TV Show Too!).

Arizona Bill Would Likely Prohibit Teachers And Professors From Teaching Any Book With ‘Profanity’

A new bill in Arizona is seeking to impose harsh restrictions on teachers’ conduct, even in their own homes. The bill, SB 1467, states that educators at the state’s public schools and universities can be fined, suspended and ultimately fired if they “engage in speech or conduct that would violate the standards adopted by the Federal Communications Commission concerning obscenity, indecency and profanity if that speech or conduct were broadcast on television or radio.”

That does a great deal to limit what can be taught in classrooms. Banning books is certainly not a new practice, but this law would cover far more than controversial books. Here’s a look at some of the key books that would be outlawed in Arizona classrooms:

Worse, as Angus Johnston notes, the bill is so ineptly drafted that it could intrude deeply into teacher’s private lives. SB 1467 doesn’t just ban public speech or conduct, but all speech and conduct. That means public school teachers in Arizona will be forbidden from engaging in any FCC-regulated activities no matter where they are. That means no sex, no going to the bathroom, no cursing and no showering. Ever.

One of the bill’s five sponsors, State Senator Lori Klein (R-AZ), has some experience in the national spotlight. Last summer she raised eyebrows when, during an interview with a reporter from the Arizona Republic, she took out a loaded handgun and pointed it at the reporter’s chest. And in the middle of Herman Cain’s sexual harassment scandal, Klein dismissed the allegations against Cain because he had “never been anything but a gentlemen” to her, “and I am not an unattractive woman.”


Arizona Law SB 1467 Would Make It Illegal to Teach Law, History, or Literature

Just when you thought the Arizona legislature was out of bad ideas.

SB 1467, newly introduced in the Arizona State Senate, would force schools and universities to suspend, fine, and ultimately fire any teacher or professor who “engage[d] in speech or conduct that would violate the standards adopted by the federal communications commission concerning obscenity, indecency and profanity if that speech or conduct were broadcast on television or radio.”

For the first offense, you’d get a one-week suspension without pay. For the second offense, two weeks. For the third, a pink slip.

As Greg Lukianoff of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education notes, this law would not only block the teaching of such classics as Ulysses, The Canterbury Tales, and Catcher in the Rye, it’d prohibit historians and law professors from competently discussing campus free speech regulations, since the most important Supreme Court case in that field hinged on a jacket with the slogan “Fuck The Draft” written on it.

It’s also worth noting, as Lukianoff does, that the bill would regulate professors’ actions outside the classroom, which means that merely writing the paragraph above — in a blogpost, a scholarly article, even a private email — would get you suspended.

But it’s even worse than that.

Note the language of the bill: You’re violating the law if you engage “in speech or conduct” that would violate FCC standards if “broadcast on television or radio.” Not public speech or conduct. Speech or conduct, full stop.

If this law passes, it will be illegal for any “person who provides classroom instruction” in the state of Arizona to have sex.

Or pee.

Ever.

Page 2 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>
lizzy_someone 15th-Feb-2012 01:37 am (UTC)
I'm kind of intrigued by that dictionary entry that says the word "fuck" is "usually obscene," because for the life of me I cannot think of a non-obscene version of "fuck."
wesaucereyes 20th-Feb-2012 02:46 pm (UTC)
When you say it in a loving manner? Yeah, I have no idea.
tabaqui 15th-Feb-2012 01:58 am (UTC)
What. The fuck. Do they have *nothing* better to do there but sit around writing up idiot crap like this? Or have they been infiltrated by some insane cult?

brittlesmile "and universities"15th-Feb-2012 12:31 pm (UTC)
What the actual fuck? Like, this is still bullshit for high schools, but I can kind of understand where the 'age appropriate' argument is coming from. But universities? Fuck...

Also. I'm especially loling at the thought that this would essentially ban the uncensored teaching of Ulysses, considering that my version begins with an excerpt from United States v. One Book Called Ulysses, the supreme court case ruling that it is not, in fact, obscene. One sometimes wonders if these people might learn something from actually reading the things they try to ban...
aviv_b Re: "and universities"15th-Feb-2012 02:34 pm (UTC)
Learnin' - that's for the liberal elite.
darsynia Re: "and universities"15th-Feb-2012 06:07 pm (UTC)
That's the thing--I mean, I'd legit expect that if this monstrosity passed, and became law, a lot of Arizona degrees would be not worth the paper they're printed on, because who wants university graduates whose education is THAT lacking??
stormqueen280 Re: "and universities"19th-Feb-2012 05:14 am (UTC)
JFC, I had not thought about that.
wesaucereyes 20th-Feb-2012 02:46 pm (UTC)
So, pretty much to be in compliance with the FCC regulations they want to be used you couldn't teach about those said violations. Ah, I see.
Page 2 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>
This page was loaded Dec 26th 2014, 5:59 am GMT.