ONTD Political

GOP's Wet Dream: Censoring Reality!

1:54 am - 02/14/2012
Finally, We Can Censor that Potty Mouth Webster and His Obscene Dictionaries (and His TV Show Too!).

Arizona Bill Would Likely Prohibit Teachers And Professors From Teaching Any Book With ‘Profanity’

A new bill in Arizona is seeking to impose harsh restrictions on teachers’ conduct, even in their own homes. The bill, SB 1467, states that educators at the state’s public schools and universities can be fined, suspended and ultimately fired if they “engage in speech or conduct that would violate the standards adopted by the Federal Communications Commission concerning obscenity, indecency and profanity if that speech or conduct were broadcast on television or radio.”

That does a great deal to limit what can be taught in classrooms. Banning books is certainly not a new practice, but this law would cover far more than controversial books. Here’s a look at some of the key books that would be outlawed in Arizona classrooms:

Worse, as Angus Johnston notes, the bill is so ineptly drafted that it could intrude deeply into teacher’s private lives. SB 1467 doesn’t just ban public speech or conduct, but all speech and conduct. That means public school teachers in Arizona will be forbidden from engaging in any FCC-regulated activities no matter where they are. That means no sex, no going to the bathroom, no cursing and no showering. Ever.

One of the bill’s five sponsors, State Senator Lori Klein (R-AZ), has some experience in the national spotlight. Last summer she raised eyebrows when, during an interview with a reporter from the Arizona Republic, she took out a loaded handgun and pointed it at the reporter’s chest. And in the middle of Herman Cain’s sexual harassment scandal, Klein dismissed the allegations against Cain because he had “never been anything but a gentlemen” to her, “and I am not an unattractive woman.”

Arizona Law SB 1467 Would Make It Illegal to Teach Law, History, or Literature

Just when you thought the Arizona legislature was out of bad ideas.

SB 1467, newly introduced in the Arizona State Senate, would force schools and universities to suspend, fine, and ultimately fire any teacher or professor who “engage[d] in speech or conduct that would violate the standards adopted by the federal communications commission concerning obscenity, indecency and profanity if that speech or conduct were broadcast on television or radio.”

For the first offense, you’d get a one-week suspension without pay. For the second offense, two weeks. For the third, a pink slip.

As Greg Lukianoff of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education notes, this law would not only block the teaching of such classics as Ulysses, The Canterbury Tales, and Catcher in the Rye, it’d prohibit historians and law professors from competently discussing campus free speech regulations, since the most important Supreme Court case in that field hinged on a jacket with the slogan “Fuck The Draft” written on it.

It’s also worth noting, as Lukianoff does, that the bill would regulate professors’ actions outside the classroom, which means that merely writing the paragraph above — in a blogpost, a scholarly article, even a private email — would get you suspended.

But it’s even worse than that.

Note the language of the bill: You’re violating the law if you engage “in speech or conduct” that would violate FCC standards if “broadcast on television or radio.” Not public speech or conduct. Speech or conduct, full stop.

If this law passes, it will be illegal for any “person who provides classroom instruction” in the state of Arizona to have sex.

Or pee.


elmocho 14th-Feb-2012 10:21 pm (UTC)
When I was in high school (in Arizona,ha, deal with it, legislator who wrote this law!) my teacher taught the Miller's Tale, but would not teach the Reeve's Tale.
nesmith 15th-Feb-2012 01:36 am (UTC)
Which is weird, since the Miller's Tale has the, um, involved meeting of a guy's lips and the girl he's wooing's naked ass (nothing like having a Jesuit priest pause the lesson and encourage the class to really fulminate on that one), then another unfortunate ass being burned by a hot poker.

Of course, that doesn't hold a candle to some of the imagery in the Summoner's Tale . . .
elmocho 15th-Feb-2012 03:04 pm (UTC)
Now I have to read the Summoner's Tale.

I think her objection was to the clerks (? Apprentices?) consecutively tag-teaming the Miller's wife and daughter. Accidental Middle-English rimming, flatulence, surprise hot poker all cool, but the multi-generational bed-swapping apparently crossed the line.
nesmith 15th-Feb-2012 07:42 pm (UTC)
The salient part of the Summoner's Tale is when the Friar goes to hell and notices there are no friars around, and says that well, they must all be in heaven since they're such pious men!

And then Satan shows him where the friars really are.
This page was loaded Feb 18th 2018, 9:40 pm GMT.