ONTD Political

Gingrich uses Limbaugh controversy to attack Obama

3:06 pm - 03/03/2012
Newt Gingrich on Saturday used the flap over Rush Limbaugh's controversial denunciations of birth-control advocate Sandra Fluke as a way to attack President Obama for acting "opportunistically" when he called the Georgetown University law student to express his disappointment over Limbaugh's comments.


HAMILTON, Ohio - Newt Gingrich on Saturday used the flap over Rush Limbaugh's controversial denunciations of birth-control advocate Sandra Fluke as a way to attack President Obama for acting "opportunistically" when he called the Georgetown University law student to express his disappointment over Limbaugh's comments.

After Limbaugh described Fluke as "slut" and "prostitute" for advocating for subsidizing birth control, Obama contacted Fluke personally. Numerous conservatives and other GOP presidential candidates have rebuked Limbaugh to varying degrees, but the former House speaker said he saw the issue much differently.

"I think the president will opportunistically do anything he can," Gingrich said in response to a reporter's question after a rally Saturday morning in Hamilton. "I think the most important use of language in the last week has been the president's apology to religious fanatics, and I want to stay focused on what the president has said, and I think what he said was inexcusable and is exactly the wrong policy at a time of life and death, and playing political games is irrelevant as far as I'm concerned."

Gingrich said the debate over requiring certain institutions to provide insurance coverage to cover contraception -- something that prompted Fluke's complaint involving Georgetown, a Jesuit-run institution -- should be over governmental interference in religion.

"It's not about contraception. It's about religious liberty," he said. "It's about the attack on the Catholic Church, and the attack on every right-to-life institution and whether or not the government has the power to dictate to religious organizations."

Gingrich, who is devoting most of his time and resources to winning the Georgia primary, made his final and lone trip to Ohio this week, three days before Super Tuesday. Gingrich also is scheduled to participate in a forum hosted by former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, make remarks at a National Rifle Association meeting in Findlay and speak at the Ohio 5th Congressional District Lincoln-Reagan Day Dinner at Bowling Green State University.


source
booksforlunch 3rd-Mar-2012 09:37 pm (UTC)
Ehhhhh, WHUT?!

When did Obama apologize to religious fanatics?
missmurchison 3rd-Mar-2012 10:00 pm (UTC)
I think he means the Koran burning incident. Because, you know, it's wrong to say you're sorry someone's holy book was destroyed. Those people are religious fanatics.

Just as it's wrong to support a citizen who stepped forward to say what she thinks in a respectful and well-informed manner. And the people who think it's appropriate to call her names and misrepresent what she said are apparently not fanatics of any kind.
angi_is_altered 3rd-Mar-2012 09:49 pm (UTC)
I can't...I just can't anymore. These people, Republicans,the GOP don't give a fuck about anyone. They just want to keep their pockets full. FUCK THEM ALL!!
zeitgeistic 3rd-Mar-2012 09:56 pm (UTC)
How is kindness now considered opportunistic? It just baffles my mind because Newt REALLY THINKS THAT WAY.

The president's language was inexcusable and yet...'slut' is totally okay?
layweed 3rd-Mar-2012 10:00 pm (UTC)
You want to talk about opportunistic? Look in the mirror, jackass.
dumpweeds 3rd-Mar-2012 10:01 pm (UTC)
the most disgusting part about the GOP is that they don't even care about what's best for their constituents. they don't care about amurrika at all. they just want the scary black man out of office.
missmurchison 3rd-Mar-2012 10:14 pm (UTC)
I've been trying to find out what was so horrible about what the President said when he apologized for the Koran burnings, which he did to stop violence. Googling turns up lots of outrage, but I don't see all the actual wording. I did find this:

In the letter, as quoted, Mr. Obama gave his "sincere apologies" and expressed "deep regret for the reported incident."

"The error was inadvertent; I assure you that we will take the appropriate steps to avoid any recurrence, to include holding accountable those responsible," said Mr. Obama, according to the statement.


So, to Gingrich, that is worse than the sludge coming from Limbaugh and others about Fluke.

lizzy_someone 3rd-Mar-2012 10:31 pm (UTC)
the attack on every right-to-life institution

Dude, if you genuinely cared about embryos' right to life, you would be handing out free birth control left and right. You know what lack of birth control leads to? ABORTIONS, you brainless douchewaffle.
chantalzola 4th-Mar-2012 01:11 am (UTC)
Hahahaha, I was just thinking this!
missmurchison 3rd-Mar-2012 11:08 pm (UTC)
And what a difference the loss of a few advertisers can make.

Limbaugh apologizes

Half-assedly, of course.

Limbaugh says he "did not mean a personal attack on Ms. Fluke."

He must think his listeners are even stupider than I do if he expects them to believe that.
roguebelle 4th-Mar-2012 12:28 am (UTC)
As Rachel Maddow was pointing out on her show, that is not crap you say accidentally. It is not crap you say if you don't mean it. Particularly not when you say it three days in a row.

That whole "apology" is complete bullshit. All it really says is "I'm sorry I'm losing sponsors" -- and it entirely fails to address or even to acknowledge that his entire tirade was based off of a willful misrepresentation of both Fluke's intent, of basic biology, and of how insurance companies work.
ebay313 3rd-Mar-2012 11:21 pm (UTC)
Not even surprising sadly. Conservative radio host says something horrible and Obama is to blame.
kyra_neko_rei 3rd-Mar-2012 11:43 pm (UTC)
"It's not about contraception. It's about religious liberty," he said. "It's about the attack on the Catholic Church, and the attack on every right-to-life institution and whether or not the government has the power to dictate to religious organizations."

Newt,

Listen, you ignorant, privileged piece of shit: the "attacks on religious liberty" or whatever are about the requirement to, or ability not to, pay for insurance policies that cover contraceptives. Therefore, this is, in fact, about contraception.

If it's not about contraception, why doesn't every Catholic organization that hires employees agree to provide contraceptive coverage in perpetuity so long as the US government refrains from demanding that they do it?

It's about contraception to any person who uses contraception and might ever conceivably work for one of these organizations (remember how we're having a recession with high unemployment and people aren't exactly full of either spare change or the ability to be picky about jobs?), and only someone who flat-out doesn't care about other people would think otherwise.
chantalzola 4th-Mar-2012 01:18 am (UTC)
Also some of the popes were in favor of birth control. Example: Pope John Paul I (The book Absolute Monarchs: A History of the Papacy is my source for that). It's very, very likely a pope in the future will be pro-birth control as well, so... no, it's not about religious freedom or an attack on the Catholic church.

Edited at 2012-03-04 01:18 am (UTC)
circumambulate 4th-Mar-2012 06:50 am (UTC)
No, Newt's absolutely right, the government has no power to dictate to religious organizations. What he's missing(deliberately ignoring) is that the government has every right, and the obligation, to dictate to employers. Religious organizations are welcome (encouraged) to stop hiring employees any time they would like.
niagarawoman 4th-Mar-2012 12:17 am (UTC)
Was waiting for this from one of the Republican candidates the second I heard Obama called Sandra Flake, tbh.
roguebelle 4th-Mar-2012 12:29 am (UTC)
I think it says a lot about conservatives that they mistake compassion for opportunism.
chantalzola 4th-Mar-2012 01:19 am (UTC)
Also those things aren't mutually exclusive. You can be both. Also there are worse things for the president to be, than opportunistic.
maynardsong 4th-Mar-2012 01:23 am (UTC)
If by "opportunistic" you mean Obama has this election in the bag because he's refrained from endorsing slut-shaming and misogyny and by virtue of the fact that he's not devoid of a soul, then yeah maybe.
hera_bearrra 4th-Mar-2012 01:44 am (UTC)
Lord help me I am getting into fights with people on twitter over this. People are so dumb, and they keep shaming Sandra Fluke on twitter.

Edited at 2012-03-04 01:50 am (UTC)
hera_bearrra 4th-Mar-2012 01:53 am (UTC)
According to conservatives, it's only an attack on religious liberty when Christians are involved. They don't give a fuck about other religions.
surealistic_des 4th-Mar-2012 03:14 am (UTC)
Never read comments at the source. Urgh! It is against my beliefs to fund the Pill. Urgh. What?

As Maryland senator Jamie Raskin said,


“When you took your oath of office, you placed your hand on the Bible and swore to uphold the Constitution. You didn’t place your hand on the Constitution and swear to uphold the Bible.”


It is not an attack on religious liberty. Far from it.

And he apologised? I can hear the false sincerely there. He's not even apologising for the remarks, but rather to prevent further sponsors from dropping his arse.
tabaqui 4th-Mar-2012 03:48 am (UTC)
Another one to whom I can only say...FUCK. YOU.
hinoema 4th-Mar-2012 04:26 am (UTC)
“When you took your oath of office, you placed your hand on the Bible and swore to uphold the Constitution. You didn't place your hand on the Constitution and swear to uphold the Bible.”

I'll have to remember that one.
circumambulate 4th-Mar-2012 06:54 am (UTC)
"I think the most important use of language in the last week has been the president's apology to religious fanatics..."

I'm sorry, Newt, are you referring to the President's statement to Afghans regarding the Koran burning, or to his relaxed stance on employer mandated contraception? You'll have to be a bit more specific...
This page was loaded May 24th 2013, 8:14 pm GMT.