ONTD Political

Kansas to Pregnant Women: "A Little Lie from Your Doctor Won't Hurt You"

11:50 pm - 03/13/2012
Posted by Jennifer Dalven, Reproductive Freedom Project at 12:54pm

It's what every pregnant woman I know dreads. Going into that big ultrasound, having the ultrasound tech, who had been so chatty, suddenly go silent. Having her do sweep after sweep across your belly without saying another word, until finally, she gets up and solemnly says, "I am going to get the doctor."

As far as pregnancy nightmares go, I thought that was one of the worst. But now politicians in Kansas are giving pregnant women and their partners something new to worry about. Buried in a sweeping anti-abortion bill is a provision that would immunize a doctor who discovers that a baby will be born with a devastating condition and deliberately withholds that information from his patient. That's right. If the bill passes, a doctor who opposes abortion could decide to lie about the results of your blood tests, your ultrasound, your cvs or your amnio. Lie to you so that you won't have information that might lead you to decide to end your pregnancy or that might lead you to learn more about your child's condition so that you are prepared to be the best parent you can be to your child.

Now, I have been working for a long time defending the right of a pregnant woman to make the best decision for herself and her family, whether that is continuing the pregnancy, adoption, or abortion, based on full, accurate information. I thought I had seen just about every manner of government intrusion into those fundamentally personal and private decisions. I thought I was past the point of being shocked and outraged. But as a mother who has been through those ultrasounds myself, the thought that my doctor could choose to withhold this information from me and take this decision away from me and my husband ... well, let's just say it really touched a nerve.

And, unfortunately, it's not just Kansas. Other states motivated by anti-abortion zeal are jumping on the it's-ok-for-doctors-to lie-to-their-patients-to-prevent-them-from-having-an-abortion bandwagon. Oklahoma recently passed a similar law. And, the Arizona legislature is considering a similar bill.

But I guess I shouldn't be surprised. Despite the rhetoric of anti-abortion politicians about how all these restrictions are necessary to ensure that women's decisions are well-informed, it's never been about that. Doctors who provide abortions already work hard to ensure that every woman has the information she needs to make the best decision for herself and her family. What these bills are about is politicians who think they know better than women and who are trying to impose their own views on abortion on a woman and her family regardless of the circumstances: That's what's behind those now infamous ultrasound bills in places like Virginia, Idaho, and Pennsylvania. That's what's behind the bills in Georgia and Arizona that would ban abortion at the point when a woman often learns about a devastating diagnosis. And that is what is behind so many of the other bills working their way through the state legislatures right now. The Kansas bill is, in a way, just more upfront about it.

Well, enough is enough. We may not all agree about abortion, but we can all agree that these decisions ought to be made by a woman and her family, not a politician. So, whether you are a man or a woman; whether you are already a parent or think you might become one in the future; whether you are blissfully pregnant or unhappily so, if you care about your right to make your own decisions, I ask that you help get the word out. Share this blog on Facebook and Twitter. Send an email with this link to the President of the Kansas Senate. Tell the politicians all over the country to stop interfering in a family's personal and private decisions.

Source



hashishinahooka 14th-Mar-2012 01:21 pm (UTC)
Here's what I don't get. I thought people who were pro-life were supposed to be concerned about the fetuses. If a fetus has a fatal condition, a condition that will negatively affect its life, or is stillborn, how is continuing the pregnancy going to help in this situation?
doverz 14th-Mar-2012 01:24 pm (UTC)
They only care about the fetus as far as it not getting aborted. The quality of its life and future mean absolutely nothing to them.
mercaque 14th-Mar-2012 01:25 pm (UTC)
It's about controlling women as much as it is concern for the fetus.
serendipity_15 14th-Mar-2012 01:26 pm (UTC)
Because the control of women trumps any an all concerns about fetuses but saying that you "care about the unborn" (but only in utero, once they are born they couldn't give a damn) polls better than saying "I hate that women have control over their reproductive lives and I REALLY want to change that".

Edited at 2012-03-14 01:29 pm (UTC)
hashishinahooka 14th-Mar-2012 03:12 pm (UTC)
Yeah, and that's exactly why I stopped being pro-life. After awhile, it was evident to me that I was the only pro-lifer who actually cared about the lives of the babies and the women who have them.

I just had an argument with someone over this, and the best argument they could come up for why a woman who had gone through rape should go through the physical hardships of pregnancy and labor just to give a baby up for adoption was, "God will help them through it."

Wanted to puke.
bestdaywelived 14th-Mar-2012 03:16 pm (UTC)
Pro-lifers often use disabled children as pawns, so they are fine with forcing women to carry children to term, even those with serious, debilitating illnesses. It sucks.
tilmon 14th-Mar-2012 10:28 pm (UTC)
They have so much concern for disabled children, but like their concern for life in general, it diminishes into invisibility with each tick of the clock. A severely disable infant is a gift from God. A severely disabled 30 year old is a welfare leech.
furrygreen 14th-Mar-2012 03:44 pm (UTC)
They just have to be born. That's all. Oh, and as long as they don't later become gay.
effervescent 14th-Mar-2012 09:46 pm (UTC)
Their focus is on control and doing everything they can to prevent the possibility of abortion, nevermind what the consequences of that might be. Ugh.
hinoema 15th-Mar-2012 01:55 am (UTC)
They don't care about anything other than knowing that they can't mentally or emotionally deal with the fact that abortion even *exists*- it's an irrational fear, not a rational decision- so they'll do anything to make it not exist, regardless of the consequences. They don't care who suffers or dies, as long as they have the security of knowing the made the scary thing go away.
hashishinahooka 15th-Mar-2012 02:51 am (UTC)
This is actually the best explanation I've heard, and I can say it was the reason I was pro-life for so many years. I'm still not comfortable with abortion, but I've come to realize how necessary it is for so many people. I also don't feel my comfort is more important than anyone else's, and it scares me more to think how many lives can be ruined from a lack of access to abortion.
This page was loaded May 18th 2013, 2:33 pm GMT.