ONTD Political

Wisconsin Bill Claims Single Moms Cause Child Abuse by Not Being Married

3:31 pm - 03/24/2012
In Wisconsin, a state senator has introduced a bill aimed at penalizing single mothers by calling their unmarried status a contributing factor in child abuse and neglect.

Senate Bill 507, introduced by Republican Senator Glenn Grothman, moves to amend existing state law by "requiring the Child Abuse and Neglect Prevention Board to emphasize nonmarital parenthood as a contributing factor to child abuse and neglect."

The bill would require educational and public awareness campaigns held by the board to emphasize that not being married is abusive and neglectful of children, and to underscore "the role of fathers in the primary prevention of child abuse and neglect."



Saying that people "make fun of old-fashioned families," Grothman -- who has never been married and has no children -- criticized social workers for not agreeing that children should only be raised by two married biological parents, and told a state Senate committee that he hopes the Child Abuse and Neglect Prevention board, of which he's a member, could "publicize something that's politically incorrect but has to be said in our society."

"Whether that leads to more people paying attention and having children after they're married or whether that leads to some others making a choice for adoptions," he said.

A third of all parents in Wisconsin are single. Given that single mothers far outnumber single fathers in the state and in the rest of the country, and given the emphasis on fathers being part of the solution rather than part of the problem, many people feel that the bill is tantamount to an attack on single moms.

At Tuesday's meeting of the state Senate Committee on Public Health, Human Services, and Revenue, lawmakers and members of the public spoke out against the proposal.

"This bill is going to do nothing to help children avoid abuse. It's going to do nothing to help families," Democratic state Representative Chris Taylor said at the meeting. "What this bill does is call out and chastise women who have babies who are unmarried."

Grothman has advanced and supported other policies "that make it harder to access prevention-based health services so that they can prevent pregnancy, so that they're not in a situations here they have an unintended or unwanted pregnancy," Taylor added.

Grothman is also the sponsor of Wisconsin State Bill 202, which would repeal the state's Equal Pay Enforcement Act. Last year he claimed in an essay that the "Left and the social welfare establishment want children born out of wedlock because they are far more likely to be dependent on the government."

In "How The United States and The State of Wisconsin Are Working to Encourage Single Motherhood and Discouraging Children in 2-Parent Families," he wrote that the government urges women not to get married by making programs like low-income housing assistance, school choice, WIC, tax credits, and food stamps more attractive than marriage.

His solution? Restrict the types of foods that can be purchased with food stamps, make Section 8 housing more cramped and limit the value of assets owned living there to $2,000, and eliminate school choice, among other things. "It is inexcusable that a single mother making $15,000 gets her kid out of the Milwaukee Public Schools but a married couple earning $50,000 is stuck in the public schools," he wrote. "It is also somewhat outrageous that some married couples feel they can only afford one or two children in part because they are paying excessive taxes to provide programs for someone else to have four or five children.

Edward Kuharski of Madison, Wisconsin, spoke out against the bill, calling it "off target."

"I don't understand a bill that's just about stating an opinion," he said, "and that appears to be the entire purpose of this bill, simply to assert an opinion and impose it upon an expert body that knows perfectly well how to do its business."

"Senator Grothman has no experience in parenting," Kuharski pointed out. "The contribution of institutional increase in neglect and abuse of children … has nothing to do with what you learned in Sunday school. Nothing. Before you put a larger target on the back of the people that you have attacked through many other bills, stop and take some responsibility for it."


source

I just can't even... I was raised by a single mother because my father was a useless piece of shit who cheated on her before she even found out she was pregnant with me (and they were teenagers). If either of my parents could be said to be abusive, I would say it's my dad, NOT my mother.
Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>
angi_is_altered 24th-Mar-2012 09:15 pm (UTC)
*RAGE*
lomesir22 24th-Mar-2012 09:24 pm (UTC)
This is too stupid for a snarky reply.
ntensity 24th-Mar-2012 09:26 pm (UTC)
I simply cannot cannot cannot bring myself to read beyond that first paragraph of this article...what the fuck.
sweptawaybayou 24th-Mar-2012 09:26 pm (UTC)
oh, that's just so VERY fucked up.

fofomazuzu 24th-Mar-2012 09:27 pm (UTC)
*Goes to his wikipedia page*

"Grothman has never been married and has no children."

THEN WHY THE FUCK ARE YOU MAKING BILLS ABOUT MARRIAGE AND PARENTING, YOU FUCKING IGNORANT ASSHAT.
fofomazuzu 24th-Mar-2012 09:41 pm (UTC)
Not to say that even with a wife and kids this would have been better but you would think that he would have them if you were making such a bill. It makes it slightly more worse that he has nothing to back his stupid ideas on and is just doing this for the hell of it.
louisadkins 24th-Mar-2012 09:30 pm (UTC)
I can't come up with an appropriate response that does not involve five horses, a thousand feet of rope, a mini-skirt, a rusty spoon, a safety whistle, a multi-tool (for the rope,) and a slice of blueberry cheesecake.
ladywilde80 24th-Mar-2012 09:31 pm (UTC)
This is the biggest load of shit I've heard in quite awhile. It takes a strong, fierce women to raise a child on her own and I give so much credit to the women who do it - this asshole can go fuck himself.

Instead of attacking the mother's of these children, why don't they make tougher laws on those deadbeat dads who get away without paying child support etc?
pandaseal 24th-Mar-2012 09:52 pm (UTC)
I love how he's angry at people who actually work in child welfare for not agreeing with him. Wow, it's almost like they were educated or something..
romp 24th-Mar-2012 10:08 pm (UTC)
Huh? I know women who were reluctant to date--and one who planned on simply not until her child was grown--because of how how many predators target single mothers in order to gain access to children. Not to mention the entitled dicks who simply resent the children of their women.

How about we support women and children enough that women don't feel they need to get involved with men as a way to survive financially?
ameonna 25th-Mar-2012 12:17 am (UTC)
God, THIS, thank you.
iheartomntd 24th-Mar-2012 10:10 pm (UTC)
I honestly can't express my utter disgust with this man.

Actually I can. The majority of single mothers are not single mothers by choice. And those who usually are, usually have the means to be able to afford to give their child the best they have the offer.

This is one of my major problems with Reps. How can you advocate for smaller government and protecting the Constitution, while continuing trying to govern people lives, using government mandates to restrict people's rights, and shitting all over the constitution once you fee like it. What does he have to say to women who divorced, women who's children's father walk out on them. No two women's story is exactly the same. These fucktards are continually trying to control and take away women's rights.

Edited at 2012-03-24 10:22 pm (UTC)
tinylegacies 24th-Mar-2012 10:25 pm (UTC)
Because they don't consider women to be people. Or any other minority really. Their definition of people is white, Christian, wealthy, heterosexual, and (cis) male.
lacunaz 24th-Mar-2012 10:16 pm (UTC)
ROLL CALL! Who was raised by a single parent?

My mother raised three girls all by herself and is a champion. If anyone is going to be under scrutiny for abuse and neglect, it should be the parent who is not raising/supporting their child. Fuck this guy for trying to make it harder for these women.
violetrose 24th-Mar-2012 10:22 pm (UTC)
Are we counting single dads in this?

It was pretty common where I live for kids to have divorced parents, and/or be raised by their mother. Most of those kids turned out fine.
bluelarkspur 24th-Mar-2012 10:22 pm (UTC)
criticized social workers for not agreeing that children should only be raised by two married biological parents
Um, maybe because they're the people who actually know and work with these women, and aren't just going off of their own preset ideas about gender and families? Sorry, you're the person with the political agenda. You should be consulting their expertise to form your policy, not forming a policy and demanding experts back that up. And am I missing something, or does that statement imply that adoption (non-biological parents) is inferior or...?

If they're worried about single mothers taking up tax money, then they would make child support payments from the dead beat fathers stricter.

Edited at 2012-03-24 10:24 pm (UTC)
ceilidh 25th-Mar-2012 03:20 am (UTC)
You should be consulting their expertise to form your policy,

LOLOLOL that would be like asking teachers how to teach or asking doctors how to practice medicine or asking scientists to do scientific things. We can't be having that.
mollywobbles867 24th-Mar-2012 10:23 pm (UTC)
bushy_brow 24th-Mar-2012 11:35 pm (UTC)
MTE!
tsaraven 24th-Mar-2012 10:26 pm (UTC)
Well I'll just be over here then in your perfect ideal nuclear family with a stay-at-home mom even while I use up medicaid, tax credits, and WIC. Dumbarse.
hazel_belle 24th-Mar-2012 10:28 pm (UTC)
hauntermooneyes 25th-Mar-2012 12:08 am (UTC)
I've seen a couple of gifs with this lovely lady in them--who is she?
violetrose 24th-Mar-2012 10:28 pm (UTC)
"make fun of old-fashioned families,"

Well, if you want traditional families to return - then I presume you want three generations under on roof? Grandparents, parents and their children? Because the nuclear family is far from traditional. The entire social norm in the 50's was a blip in our history.

he wrote that the government urges women not to get married by making programs like low-income housing assistance, school choice, WIC, tax credits, and food stamps more attractive than marriage.

lmao yes, my life goal is to be a single mum on benefits living in a council flat. That's the dream life, bbs!
thelilyqueen 25th-Mar-2012 03:31 am (UTC)
Not to mention, the 50s? Often not so great and squeaky clean beneath the surface, even in the SAHM-mom-and-breadwinner-dad-and-three-kids-and-a-dog families.
tabaqui 24th-Mar-2012 10:29 pm (UTC)
Oh, fuck him. Just...really. Idiot.
beoweasel 24th-Mar-2012 10:29 pm (UTC)
My roommate is the child of a single parent, she did her best to take care of him (despite suffering from dementia), until she passed away when he was ten. After her death, my roomie ended up in the care of his much older brother and his wife. My roommate's brother systematically abused him for the next seven years, until kicking him out of the house.

So yeah.

babysinclair 25th-Mar-2012 02:10 am (UTC)
:'(
doverz 24th-Mar-2012 10:45 pm (UTC)
"Grothman has advanced and supported other policies "that make it harder to access prevention-based health services so that they can prevent pregnancy, so that they're not in a situations here they have an unintended or unwanted pregnancy," Taylor added."

I'm shocked I tell you, SHOCKED!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Fuck this guy along with his fellow Republican Senator who said that women who are victims of domestic violence should stick it out by remembering the good times and hope it goes back to that.

What's most important is having a stable home environment, whether that be with one or two parents.
bluelarkspur 25th-Mar-2012 03:40 am (UTC)
who said that women who are victims of domestic violence should stick it out by remembering the good times and hope it goes back to that.

Wait, what? Are you kidding me? Someone in a public office said this?

Okay, I was reading this piece as them being ignorant and thinking "those women who sleep around and purposefully have children to live off of welfare" without considering all the circumstances women find themselves in. But I guess not. Better for a kid to watch his dad beat his mom than have a single mom.
anus 24th-Mar-2012 10:47 pm (UTC)
What.... how would that even work I can't my brain is imploding from stupidness. So would they be fined for not being married? Will they take their kid away if they don't hook up with a man? what is this bullshit
hinoema 25th-Mar-2012 02:56 am (UTC)
Basically, his opinion is that the only place for a woman is in the control of a man, i.e. married.
meimichan 24th-Mar-2012 10:54 pm (UTC)
Glenn Grothman is such a loathsome piece of shit. He is definitely one of the biggest assholes in state office here.
ook 24th-Mar-2012 10:57 pm (UTC)
Here's a photo of this charmer. Ladies! He's still single!



Wisconsin State Senator Glenn Grothman who just happens to be a Republican.
alierakieron 24th-Mar-2012 11:05 pm (UTC)
Fucking Grothman.
i_llbedammned 24th-Mar-2012 11:15 pm (UTC)
That is absolutely insulting to everyone who is a single parent. It also would make it harder to come forth if let's say a spouse was abusive since if you were to divorce with the kids then you could be charged with child abuse and have the children taken away from you.
melonsplash 24th-Mar-2012 11:53 pm (UTC)
Oh yes. Things like this have far-reaching consequences.

Edited at 2012-03-24 11:55 pm (UTC)
walkwithheroes 24th-Mar-2012 11:40 pm (UTC)
This is the stupidest thing I have ever heard. I would much rather be raised by a single parent, than. . .say, two abusive parents. Or one abusive parent and one lovely parent. It takes a lot of work to be a single parent and I applaud that.

Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>
This page was loaded May 25th 2013, 1:10 am GMT.