ONTD Political

Romney: Uninsured with preexisting conditions should be denied coverage

9:37 pm - 03/28/2012


Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney on Tuesday insisted that President Barack Obama’s health care reform law should be overturned and that people with preexisting conditions should be denied coverage if they had never had insurance before.


During an appearance on NBC’s Tonight Show, host Jay Leno told Romney that he knew people that had never been able to get insurance before “Obamacare” was passed.

“It seems to me like children and people with preexisting conditions should be covered,” Leno noted.

“People with preexisting conditions — as long as they’ve been insured before, they’re going to continue to have insurance,” Romney explained.

“Suppose they were never insured?” Leno asked.

“Well, if they’re 45 years old, and they show up, and they say, I want insurance, because I’ve got a heart disease, it’s like, `Hey guys, we can’t play the game like that. You’ve got to get insurance when you’re well, and if you get ill, then you’re going to be covered,’” Romney replied.

“I know guys that work in the auto industry and they’re just not covered because they work in brake dust,” Leno pressed. “And then they get to be 30, 35, and were never able to get insurance before. Now they have it. That seems like a good thing.”

“But people who have had the chance to be insured — if you’re working in an auto business for instance, the companies carry insurance, they insure all their employees — you look at the circumstances that exist,” the candidate explained. “But you don’t want everyone saying, `I’m going to sit back until I get sick and then go buy insurance.’ That doesn’t make sense. But you have to find rules that get people in that are playing by the rules.”


The Washington Post‘s Greg Sargent pointed out that by passing health insurance mandates in Massachusetts, Romney had acknowledged that people should get coverage when they are well, but he had since moved further to the right in an effort to win the GOP presidential primary.

“So he’s forced to give a nonsensical answer to the core policy and moral question that’s left behind if we do away with Obamacare: What should the federal government do about those who can’t get insurance covarge, thanks to preexisting conditions?” Sargent wrote.

“Until Romney details otherwise, his answer, for all practical purposes, is: Nothing.”

SOURCE
doverz 29th-Mar-2012 03:28 am (UTC)
Fuck you Mittens. People don't have insurance for all kinds of reasons, like not being able to afford it or because insurance companies are fucking assholes and deny you for no fucking reason. You are so fucking disconnected from what the average American goes through.
hinoema 29th-Mar-2012 05:00 am (UTC)
Or because you live in a 'right to work' state and your employer refuses to offer insurance and what can you do? Yeah.
furrygreen 29th-Mar-2012 07:03 am (UTC)
Yes, THIS! Damn you, Utah!
mhael AND South Carolina29th-Mar-2012 11:26 am (UTC)
"Right to work" = "Right to Get Fired For Anything, Ever, Including Nothing"
furrygreen Re: AND South Carolina29th-Mar-2012 12:12 pm (UTC)
No kidding! Only way to get medical benefits here is a) work for the state, b) be in upper management, or c) work in healthcare/a job where not having healthcare is a liability such as the healthcare industry. It's sickening.
kyra_neko_rei Re: AND South Carolina29th-Mar-2012 05:26 pm (UTC)
Right to work" = right to screw over yourself along with everyone else by putting yourself in as the lowest common denominator.

This is what happens when they put "jobs" rather than "livelihoods" or "sources of income" as the solution to the economy---if people don't value their own labor, nobody else is going to, and this is a one-way express ticket to poverty.
peace_piper 29th-Mar-2012 08:44 am (UTC)
Or working 39.5 hours at a job instead of 40 and, oh we only give insurance to "full-time employees".
tsaraven 29th-Mar-2012 04:28 pm (UTC)
Yup. The way my work was set up there were two full-time positions and one part-time, so even if I needed the "part-time" person to work 40 hours a week for months she was still classified that way and received no benefits. It was the same at my spouse's old grocery store. They were told how many "full-time" cashier positions there were with benefits available, and everyone was without them even at consistent 40 hour weeks.
celtic_thistle 29th-Mar-2012 04:34 pm (UTC)
Classic! Or "oh it's a part-time job" and they have you come in for 35-39 hours a week but lol you don't get benefits because you're not full-time! WHAT.
gangsterdorothy 29th-Mar-2012 12:42 pm (UTC)
I have not had insurance in almost 10 years. I think the only way I can get insurance with a reasonable rate is through a future spouse or if I get a decent job that gives me a decent rate.

It's insane how much it costs a month.
This page was loaded May 25th 2013, 1:22 pm GMT.