ONTD Political

House Republicans Vote Against Facebook Privacy

5:22 pm - 03/29/2012
In a continued effort to work against the American people, House Republicans blocked a measure 236-184 (that’s every single voting House Republican) that would have allowed the Federal Communications Committee to prevent employers from asking for and obtaining Facebook passwords from workers. Democrats introduced the legislation as part of a bill adding new restrictions on the FCC as it’s being reported that an increasing number of employers are demanding access to social media.

Rep. Ed Perlmutter (D-Colo) argued “They have an expectation that their right to free speech or their right to free religion will be respected when they use these social media outlets.”


He added “If an employer wants to pose as or impersonate the individual who had to turn over their confidential password, that employer, I think, will be able to reach into personal, private information of the user, or of the person who’s communicating with them.”

Perlmutter also said “If you are a Facebook user, you should never have to share your password.”

The job market is slowly improving and this means more and more people will have to choose between releasing private, personal information in order to earn a living or shut down their social media accounts altogether. Even with an improving job market, employment opportunities are far and few between. Putting food on the table trumps playing on Facebook.

Where does this end? How long before we hand over a set of house keys to an employer so they can rummage through our belongings and barge in whenever they feel like it?

We have six more months before we can vote in a new House. Before you do, ask yourself ”What have the Republicans done to make your life better or easier?”

Source
kaelstra 29th-Mar-2012 11:24 pm (UTC)
This is bullshit. I don't even understand why this is a thing.
theguindo 29th-Mar-2012 11:25 pm (UTC)
ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME

STOP VOTING AGAINST THINGS JUST BECAUSE DEMOCRATS SUPPORT THEM

JESUS FUCKING CHRIST, CAN YOU NOT PUT PARTY LOYALTY DOWN FOR FIVE FUCKING SECONDS AND DO WHAT IS RIGHT
nonnycat 29th-Mar-2012 11:25 pm (UTC)
Wait. Aren't Republicans supposed to be the diehard "BUT MY FREE SPEEEEEECH"ers?

HOW THE FUCK DOES THIS MAKE SENSE?
jjj 30th-Mar-2012 12:06 am (UTC)
when have they ever made sense
k0liverbby 29th-Mar-2012 11:25 pm (UTC)
I'm honestly not too worried about this because with Facebook becoming public in just a couple of months there's too much money in Facebook for them to let this happen. Facebook spoke out against things like this obviously because it's a violation of their privacy (don't share your passwords) but also because that means people are gonna be less likely to share REAL information on facebook. That's the whole bread and butter of Facebook, advertisers can find out ACCURATE information about potential customers and markets.

I have a feeling that Facebook is gonna get some kinda legislation passed about this before the year is over
wesaucereyes 30th-Mar-2012 12:45 am (UTC)
FB already released a statement about this and how you should never have to give your password to anyone for anything ever. They also mentioned in it, that if it came to it, they would start taking legal measures against companies who take part in the practice.
effervescent 29th-Mar-2012 11:30 pm (UTC)
What the fuck? So let me get this straight - they're against 'big government', but for employers being able to snoop into the private lives of their employees?
cpip 30th-Mar-2012 12:43 am (UTC)
Right-o. THE MARKET WILL CONTROL AAAAAALLLL.

IF YOU DON'T LIKE IT FIND ANOTHER JOB.
crossfire 29th-Mar-2012 11:37 pm (UTC)
Ed Perlmutter, smh.
schmanda 30th-Mar-2012 02:32 am (UTC)
Why the smh?
keeperofthekeys 29th-Mar-2012 11:41 pm (UTC)
...what were their arguments for not supporting it?
jettakd 30th-Mar-2012 12:10 am (UTC)
Because Democrats.
colliedlight 29th-Mar-2012 11:41 pm (UTC)
I just. Why?

kuhori_rei 29th-Mar-2012 11:51 pm (UTC)
UGH REPUBLICANS

Photobucket
babysinclair 29th-Mar-2012 11:56 pm (UTC)
FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK
citiesburning 30th-Mar-2012 12:01 am (UTC)
so by less government, they actually mean more?
yamamanama 30th-Mar-2012 12:45 am (UTC)
By less government, they mean a transfer of government powers to corporations.
twowaymirrrors 30th-Mar-2012 12:07 am (UTC)
What the fuck. What kind of excuses are they going to give for even opposing this? Stop voting against things just because Democrats want it jfc

citiesburning 30th-Mar-2012 12:08 am (UTC)
HOW DO YOU GET THE JOB OF THE PERSON WHO GETS TO DO THE SNOOPING?! I want that job.
laja_89 30th-Mar-2012 01:43 am (UTC)
Getting paid to be a facebook creeper!
leaf_kunoichi 30th-Mar-2012 01:43 am (UTC)
"House Republicans blocked a measure 236-184 (that’s every single voting House Republican) that would have allowed the Federal Communications Committee to prevent employers from asking for and obtaining Facebook passwords from workers."

While I agree that it should have been passed, it is not factual that every single House Republican blocked the measure. 1 voted for it and 6 did not vote. Of course, that is a sharp contrast to the 2 Dems that voted Nay and 5 that did not vote.

Things like in rhetoric annoy me.
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2012/roll137.xml
laja_89 30th-Mar-2012 01:44 am (UTC)
I wonder what they are looking for. And wonder what automatically makes you an unsuitable candidate for employment.

Is anything happening in Canada about this?
lil_insanity 30th-Mar-2012 02:18 am (UTC)
1. Not being Christian
2. Being gay
3. Being a minority
4. Being pregnant/having kids

AKA everything they're not allowed to ask you on your application...
celtic_thistle 30th-Mar-2012 02:37 am (UTC)
Heyyyy, Rep Perlmutter is my Congresscritter!

But seriously, fuck the Republicans. The House NEEDS to go back into Democratic hands, jfc.
dawn9476 30th-Mar-2012 03:56 am (UTC)
These are the same assholes who preach about personal freedom and privacy. ::SMH::
baked_goldfish 30th-Mar-2012 04:37 am (UTC)
The Republican platform, as I understand it:

1. Corporations = people with a right to privacy. Actual people = lol. People who are not rich white men = double lol.

2. Money = speech. More money = more speech.

3. Corporate money = protected speech. Money for actual people = limit access in order to maintain freedoms for corporations.

Edited at 2012-03-30 04:37 am (UTC)
roseofjuly 30th-Mar-2012 05:26 am (UTC)
What is the Republicans' excuse for this shit?
This page was loaded May 24th 2013, 10:05 am GMT.