ONTD Political

Oh look, he doesn't like women either, this is my surprise face.

8:32 pm - 04/07/2012
In 2009, Derbyshire Argued Women Shouldn’t Vote: ‘Women Voting Is Bad For Conservatism’

The National Review’s John Derbyshire isn’t just an avowed racist and a homophobe. He’s also a misogynist. In 2009, he authored a book that contained a chapter titled “The Case Against Women’s Suffrage.” In it, he argued the country would be better off if women didn’t have the right to vote. He discussed his views in a Sept. 2009 interview with Alan Colmes:

DERBYSHIRE: Among the hopes that I do not realistically nurse is the hope that female suffrage will be repealed. But I’ll say this – if it were to be, I wouldn’t lose a minute’s sleep.

COLMES: We’d be a better country if women didn’t vote?

DERBYSHIRE: Probably. Don’t you think so?

COLMES: No, I do not think so whatsoever.

DERBYSHIRE: Come on Alan. Come clean here [laughing]. Ahem, PRRIIIIIIIIIIIIICK

COLMES: We would be a better country? John Derbyshire making the statement, we would be a better country if women did not vote.

In an Oct. 2009 interview with Thom Hartmann, he clarified his stance, arguing that women should have the right to vote but simply shouldn’t exercise it. As he stated, “the proposition that women voting is bad for conservatism, and as a conservative, of course, I think that’s bad for society.” Listen here:



But remember, anyone who tells you there’s a conservative “war on women” is spouting pure “fiction,” according to RNC Chairman Reince Priebus.

Source: http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2012/04/07/460188/in-2009-derbyshire-argued-women-shouldnt-vote-women-voting-is-bad-for-conservatism/

And only just NOW has he been fired? Jesus Christ. Of course, I think he was fired less for having racist views, and more because he was just being blunt about it.
doverz 8th-Apr-2012 01:06 am (UTC)
Not surprising at all.

How much do you want to bet that he will be speaking on Faux News soon moaning about how people are out to get him??
yamamanama 8th-Apr-2012 01:22 am (UTC)
You think National Review will rehire him because people will complain about political correctness gone MAAAAAAAD?
layweed 8th-Apr-2012 01:44 am (UTC)
GIT BACK IN THE KITCHEN, WIMMIN.
lickbrains 8th-Apr-2012 01:45 am (UTC)
REALLY? This backward jackass has only been fired NOW? White male privilege at its best. Fuck it all.
girlglowstoxic 8th-Apr-2012 01:51 am (UTC)
I don't understand why women not voting is going to help things.
isn't that what he saying?
Women are somehow responsible for some kind of corruption??
homasse 8th-Apr-2012 01:53 am (UTC)
Women tend to vote more liberal/Democratic. So we're ruining the country.
sophiaserpentia 8th-Apr-2012 02:56 am (UTC)
Aristocrats take a long view of human history. They see modern steps towards equality as an unfortunate blip in what was an otherwise favorable pattern. They are testing, testing, testing, always, for that moment of weakness when they will have an opening to push back the calendar a century or two.
carolpent 8th-Apr-2012 03:05 am (UTC)
Very much this. And we're at the perfect time for it, is the thing. When shit starts to go wrong, the ruling class won't take the blame upon themselves and their own shitty decisions, but place it upon minority groups that have made strides towards equality.
aviv_b I'm shocked!8th-Apr-2012 03:01 am (UTC)
You mean to say that a white man who hates blacks also hates women? I'm shocked I tell you, shocked. I'm only shocked that his vile misogyny as well as his racism was ignored for so long.
ebay313 8th-Apr-2012 03:32 am (UTC)
If the problem with women voting is that we vote liberal, wouldn't it just make more sense to make it illegal for all liberals to vote. And pass laws keeping liberals off the ballots. And sadly, you know there are for real conservatives out there shouting about "FREEDOM" and "DEMOCRACY" who think in all seriousness that would be a good idea. Michigan conservative are apparently already working toward that goal. I hate the world right now -_-
porcelain72 8th-Apr-2012 03:45 am (UTC)
Another one of Derbyshire's greatest hits: women are only attractive between the ages of 15 and 20.

The shit he spews is especially cowardly because he pulls that "Don't blame me, I'm just saying what everyone is thinking! Sorry if you can't handle the truth!" card.
carolpent 8th-Apr-2012 04:08 am (UTC)
And he's a creeper, too! Well, I guess if you go by the idea that every kind of person exists in the world, it makes sense that someone would have every bad trait you could possibly ascribe to a human being.

Should I be amazed that this man has a wife and kids?
nikoel 8th-Apr-2012 06:32 am (UTC)
I was all wary of clicking that and reading more creeperness from Derbyshire, then found it was actually Hugo Schwyzer's (of ALL people) blog and now I'm in dire need of a scalding shower with a loofah the size of a bulldog. Thanks for that!

ETA for typos

Edited at 2012-04-08 06:33 am (UTC)
ladypolitik 8th-Apr-2012 06:27 pm (UTC)
A latent pedophile on top of all that; good to know.
shoujokakumei 8th-Apr-2012 03:48 am (UTC)
If this guy's looking for sympathy, I can suggest that he look between shit and syphilis in the dictionary, because he won't be finding it here...
saintly_heretic 8th-Apr-2012 06:05 am (UTC)
i'm kind of in love with this and this felt like an appropriate place to put it
beoweasel 8th-Apr-2012 06:16 am (UTC)
-Starts Bashing his Face against the 'Like' Button-

I DON'T THINK YOU UNDERSTAND HOW MUCH I LOVE THIS POST.

dearmisterecho 8th-Apr-2012 11:40 am (UTC)
I love the fact that not only is it about women's suffrage, but that it's SO WELL DONE. It's production matches what it's parodying, and that triples it's amazingness.
wrestlingdog 8th-Apr-2012 02:24 pm (UTC)
AWESOME.

(Oh, and this is the same group that did the Too Late to Apologize video? EXTRA AWESOME.)
schmanda 8th-Apr-2012 06:25 am (UTC)
He's also the weirdo who wrote the "satirical" Chelsea Clinton column right after her father left office, and he was one of the assholes on the right blaming the victims at Virginia Tech for allegedly not fighting back.

The man's a long-standing, contemptible shitstain.
wrestlingdog 8th-Apr-2012 02:18 pm (UTC)
...What the everloving fuck.
roseofjuly 8th-Apr-2012 01:30 pm (UTC)
he clarified his stance, arguing that women should have the right to vote but simply shouldn’t exercise it.

There is functionally zero difference between the two, so this makes no sense.
wingstar102 8th-Apr-2012 02:02 pm (UTC)
I know. I just let my brain imploded at the stupidity and moved on. It's easier that way. LOL.
furrygreen 8th-Apr-2012 04:09 pm (UTC)
This is awesome!

Hey! Women might not vote or might vote against us! I know, let's take away the vote from women, that'll solve things!

Hey! Best way to get a record woman voter turnout, I recon.
dragonhawker 9th-Apr-2012 09:42 pm (UTC)
‘Women Voting Is Bad For Conservatism’

I'm going to file this one with such pearl-clutching statements as "The gay agenda wants to teach our children that being gay is OK!"

The file is called "That's true. And this is a bad thing how?"

Edited at 2012-04-09 09:42 pm (UTC)
This page was loaded May 18th 2013, 3:38 pm GMT.