ONTD Political

Mitt Romney at private fundraiser: I might eliminate HUD

4:54 pm - 04/16/2012
At a private fundraiser in Florida on Sunday, Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney offered an unusual glimpse at his policy plans — including the possibility that he might eliminate an agency his father led.

Romney generally avoids such details on the campaign trail, aiming to keep the focus on what President Obama has done rather than what President Romney would do.

In his 1994 Senate race against Ted Kennedy, Romney advocated for ending the Department of Education. Kennedy attacked on the issue, and the experience taught him to avoid specifics.

So his words at the high-dollar event, reported by NBC News and the Wall Street Journal, were a rare look at some of the near-certain nominee’s future plans for reducing the size of the federal government and ending tax deductions.

His wife, Ann Romney, also spoke candidly about the flap over stay-at-home moms last week as a campaign boost.

“I’m going to take a lot of departments in Washington, and agencies, and combine them. Some eliminate, but I’m probably not going to lay out just exactly which ones are going to go,” Romney told the audience. His words were heard by reporters on a sidewalk outside the event. “Things like Housing and Urban Development, which my dad was head of, that might not be around later.”

In the past, Romney has argued that the government should not try to stop the foreclosure process, and he once listed “housing vouchers” among the programs in place to help the poor.

Obama’s campaign jumped on the remarks.

“In order to fund his $5 trillion tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans, [Romney] would make deep cuts in programs essential to the middle class like education and housing,” said spokesman Ben LaBolt in a statement to reporters.

Eddie Eitches, president of AFGE Local 476, a union representing about 6,000 HUD employees said the former Massachusetts governor’s comments show he’s out of touch.

Most everything he says about the housing industry and the crisis makes no sense,” Eitches said Monday morning when told of Romney’s comments. “We do a lot of things. We engage in fair housing, we stop discrimination, our FHA program provides mortgages for the middle class.”

HUD did not immediately return requests for comment.

Romney added that he would would either shrink the Department of Education or consolidate it with another agency. But, he said, “I'm not going to get rid of it entirely” — in part because of the lesson he learned in 1994.

In a recent Fox News interview, Romney that the department “may be combined with other agencies” and that education should be “managed at the state level, not at the federal level.”

Romney also went into some detail about his plans to cut or limit tax deductions for high-income Americans.

In the past, Romney has pledged to close loopholes and deductions for wealthier Americans but been vague about which ones.

On Sunday night, Romney said he would “probably eliminate for high-income people the second-home mortgage deduction” as well as deductions for state income and property taxes.

Romney sources say he was tossing out ideas at the fundraiser, not unveiling policy.

“While President Obama is interested only in offering excuses and blaming others for his failures, Governor Romney is discussing some of the ideas he has to tackle the big issues facing America,” said Romney spokeswoman Andrea Saul. “Governor Romney has also laid out a bold set of policy proposals that will grow our economy, cut spending and get our massive debt under control.”

Romney and his wife also talked politics.

The candidate addressed the need to win over Hispanic voters and said there must be a “Republican DREAM Act” — a reference to legislation that would give undocumented immigrant students a path to citizenship.

Ann Romney, speaking of the gap her husband faces with women voters, acknowledged that Democratic strategist Hilary Rosen’s claim that she “never worked a day in her life” was a boon.

“It was my early birthday present for someone to be critical of me as a mother, and that was really a defining moment, and I loved it,” she said.

Source

Additional reading on George Romney's time at HUD, the projects he tried to enact (or keep going from the Johnson administration), and the pushback he received from his party over it.
chaya 16th-Apr-2012 08:57 pm (UTC)
Thank you for the resubmit, this is pefect ♥

(also, Romney is still a sack of dicks)
baked_goldfish 16th-Apr-2012 09:12 pm (UTC)
Thanks for letting me know the policy!

And yes, yes he is.
brucelynn 16th-Apr-2012 09:02 pm (UTC)
Ugghhhh fuck him

he is so hateful
makemerun 16th-Apr-2012 09:07 pm (UTC)
Surprise surprise, Romney is being a total piece of shit.

Campaign hard, people. This guy cannot be president. This candidate? We're going to get rid of him.
chimbleysweep 16th-Apr-2012 09:11 pm (UTC)
Does he actually know how anything works or is he genuinely so concerned about winning that he's basically throwing everything at the wall to see what will stick?

Because he comes off as idiotic as Palin, except less genuine.
baked_goldfish 16th-Apr-2012 09:14 pm (UTC)
is he genuinely so concerned about winning that he's basically throwing everything at the wall to see what will stick

Pretty much this. Every day, the man reaches new heights of pander-monium.
lickety_split 16th-Apr-2012 09:29 pm (UTC)
Wasn't he (at least) a semi-decent person like 5 years ago? What happened?
layweed 16th-Apr-2012 09:32 pm (UTC)
Probably the same thing that happened with McCain. Either he was acting all this time, or the running for Republican presidential candidate turns you into a complete and utter douche.
baked_goldfish 16th-Apr-2012 09:43 pm (UTC)
This boy shifts with the wind. In '02 he was running for governor of a moderately liberal state, in '07 he wasn't around very long and the GOP wasn't yet outraged over the president being black.
amyura 17th-Apr-2012 01:39 pm (UTC)
No, not really. He was governor of my state from 2002 to 2006. He pretty much stopped governing in late 2004 so he could start running for president. He balanced the state budget "without raising taxes" by not raising income or capital-gains taxes, but raising ALL fees and cutting local aid so much that everyone's property taxes and local fees went up. So yeah, he's always been a liar.

Also, he wrote this long op-ed in the Boston Globe around the time he wanted to start running for president where he explained why he was now anti-choice after running on a vehemently pro-choice ticket.
kyra_neko_rei 17th-Apr-2012 02:34 pm (UTC)
He decided to run for President as a Republican, that's what happened.
fornikate 17th-Apr-2012 04:47 pm (UTC)
he stopped pretending, imo
layweed 16th-Apr-2012 09:32 pm (UTC)
Y'know, as crazy as 2012 is shaping up to be, I fear 2016 is going to be worse. This year, we have an incumbent president. Next time, we won't be so lucky.
baked_goldfish 16th-Apr-2012 09:40 pm (UTC)
The thing that terrifies me about 2016 is that the GOP seems to insist on letting the last-go-round's runner up be the nominee. Paul and Gingrich aren't runners-up in any real sense, and Santorum didn't do so bad this time around for not having any money the first few months.
babysinclair 16th-Apr-2012 11:09 pm (UTC)
I will be shaking and crying to what will happen in '16 after November
kitanabychoice 16th-Apr-2012 09:41 pm (UTC)
I love how he randomly throws out one little tidbit towards the "moderate" base about cutting SECOND home mortgage deductions right after talking about getting rid of HUD and the department of education.

I swear, these people really want us poor, stupid, and helpless.
babysinclair 16th-Apr-2012 11:07 pm (UTC)
I'm still baffled on how CUTTING the RICH TAXES is gonna get the budget under control???

Didn't Bill get his surplus by taxing the rich?
tabaqui 16th-Apr-2012 11:30 pm (UTC)
Oh, dear gods, fuck him. Poor, ignorant and desperate - that's how the GOP wants America.
jessyryan 17th-Apr-2012 02:09 am (UTC)
Foxconn America is the dream.
angry_chick 17th-Apr-2012 01:49 am (UTC)
I hope that, with this being Obama's final term, that he manages to show his ass in regards to congress and passing awesome shit.
hinoema 17th-Apr-2012 04:38 am (UTC)
“Governor Romney has also laid out a bold set of policy proposals..."

"Romney sources say he was tossing out ideas at the fundraiser, not unveiling policy...."


Ok, then.
romp 17th-Apr-2012 05:23 am (UTC)
maybe he's trying to pick up the Ron Paul fans?

tho' the brutality does fit with everything else the GOP is selling
kyra_neko_rei 17th-Apr-2012 02:36 pm (UTC)
Well, one good thing about the internet. There should be less ability for people to say one thing to some people and something else to others.
krinchan 17th-Apr-2012 03:50 pm (UTC)
You underestimate the power of ignorance.

Remember: There are still people who believe in the Biblical Literalism version of Creationism. Just sayin'.

Also: See Global Warming.

Finally: Check in on http://www.galileowaswrong.com/galileowaswrong/

If people can buy all that, it should be damn easy to just say, "It wasn't me."

They even caught you on the camera!

"It wasn't me."

And they will believe it.
kyra_neko_rei 17th-Apr-2012 04:41 pm (UTC)
Not sure what that has to do with it.

The deliberate Ignorati are irrelevant here---they'll vote Republican no matter what and good riddance to them.

But secrecy helps him screw over the merely uninformed, and that's what the internet can help with.

When Romney talks to an upscale group of donors, it won't be JUST to an upscale group of donors. His political opponents will know he said it and they will tell the community of lower-income swing voters he'll later try to convince that he won't threaten their economic security. And they will consider the possibility that he's a lying two-face and vote for the guy who DOESN'T make deliberate contradictory promises to all and sundry.

People can buy all that shit you mentioned above. But not everyone does.
krinchan 17th-Apr-2012 08:22 pm (UTC)
I misread the direction you were headed with that. Unfortunately, I think the number of people who might vote for Romney and could be swayed by that factor are not statistically significant. I can't seem to fight my gut instinct that the difference between a general election today and a general election in November will be well beneath 10%. The truly unfortunate part is that that 10% difference may very well determine the election.

At least I don't live in a battle ground state. The ads are going to be ubiquitous and unavoidable this year.
kyra_neko_rei 17th-Apr-2012 11:48 pm (UTC)
The last two elections were within less than 5% difference in the popular vote. And anything that keeps Romney from falsely reassuring people into voting for him . . .
krinchan 18th-Apr-2012 05:57 pm (UTC)
As a quick look to Wikipedia confirms, a vast majority of our races have been close calls.

Strange, it would appear the theme for this week in my life is, "Things really have always been this way." O_o
dncingmalkavian 18th-Apr-2012 10:33 pm (UTC)
What the actual fuck.
This page was loaded May 25th 2013, 6:18 am GMT.