ONTD Political

How America is Keeping Us Safe from Uncooperative Suspects, And She Looks so Innocent!

5:12 am - 04/26/2012
Once Again, the Universe Decides to Be more Fuck Up Than The Onion...

TSA Defends Pat-Down Of Crying 4-Year-Old Girl At Kansas Airport

The grandmother of a 4-year-old girl who became hysterical during a security screening at a Kansas airport said Wednesday that the child was forced to undergo a pat-down after hugging her, with security agents yelling and calling the crying girl an uncooperative suspect.

The incident has been garnering increasing media and online attention since the child's mother, Michelle Brademeyer of Montana, detailed the ordeal in a public Facebook post last week. The Transportation Security Administration is defending its agents, despite new procedures aimed at reducing pat-downs of children.

The child's grandmother, Lori Croft, told The Associated Press that Brademeyer and her daughter, Isabella, initially passed through security at the Wichita airport without incident. The girl then ran over to briefly hug Croft, who was awaiting a pat-down after tripping the alarm, and that's when TSA agents insisted the girl undergo a physical pat-down.

Isabella had just learned about "stranger danger" at school, her grandmother said, adding that the girl was afraid and unsure about what was going on.

"She started to cry, saying `No I don't want to,' and when we tried talking to her she ran," Croft said. "They yelled, `We are going to shut down the airport if you don't grab her.'"

But she said the family's main concern was the lack of understanding from TSA agents that they were dealing with a 4-year-old child, not a terror suspect.

"There was no common sense and there was no compassion," Croft said. "That was our biggest fault with the whole thing – not that they are following security procedures, because I understand that they have to do that."

Brademeyer, of Missoula, Mont., wrote a public Facebook post last week about the April 15 incident, claiming TSA treated her daughter "no better than if she had been a terrorist." The posting was taken down Wednesday. Another post said the family had filed formal complaints with the TSA and the airport.

The TSA released a statement Tuesday saying it explained to the family why additional security procedures were necessary and that agents didn't suspect or suggest the child was carrying a firearm.

"TSA has reviewed the incident and determined that our officers followed proper screening procedures in conducting a modified pat-down on the child," the agency said.

The statement noted that the agency recently implemented modified screening procedures for children age 12 and younger to further reduce the need for pat-downs of children, such as multiple passes through a metal detector and advanced imaging technology.

"These changes in protocol will ultimately reduce – though not eliminate – pat-downs of children," the statement said. "In this case, however, the child had completed screening but had contact with another member of her family who had not completed the screening process."

U.S. Sen. Jon Tester, a Montana Democrat, pressed the TSA for more information Wednesday. Tester, a member of the Senate Homeland Security Committee, said he was concerned the TSA went too far.

"I am a staunch advocate for effective transportation security, but I'm also a strong advocate for common sense and the freedoms we enjoy as Americans," Tester wrote to TSA Administrator John Pistole. "Any report of abuse of the power entrusted to officers of the TSA is especially concerning – especially if it involves children."

In a phone interview from her home in Fountain Valley, Calif., Croft said Brademeyer tried to no avail to get TSA agents to use a wand on the frightened girl or allow her to walk through the metal detector again. She also said TSA agents wanted to screen her granddaughter alone in a separate room.

"She was kicking and screaming and fighting and in hysterics," Croft said. "At that point my daughter ran up to her against TSA's orders because she said, `My daughter is terrified, I can't leave her.'"

The incident went on for maybe 10 minutes, until a manager came in and allowed agents to pat the girl down while she was screaming but being held by her mother. The family was then allowed to go to their next gate with a TSA agent following them.

Croft said that for the first few nights after coming home, Isabelle had nightmares and talked about kidnappers. She said TSA agents had shouted at the girl, telling her to calm down and saying the suspect wasn't cooperating.

"To a 4-year-old's perspective that's what it was to her because they didn't explain anything and she did not know what was going on," Croft said. "She saw people grabbing at her and raising their voices. To her, someone was trying to kidnap her or harm her in some way."

hotcement 26th-Apr-2012 12:10 pm (UTC)
ridiculous. i'm always so appalled at these stories.

i can understand that the TSA's rule structure sucks and is murky and vague as fuck, but just because every tiny little scenario isn't outlined in the handbook doesn't excuse a lack of common sense. it's a CHILD.
tabaqui 26th-Apr-2012 12:26 pm (UTC)
My daughter is flying with her dad in July. Gah. This makes me *very* unhappy. And wth, even if you 'have' to pat down a four year old (wtf) - the least you could do is take one minute to have the parent explain and not work the child into hysterics and then act as if you're the hurt party.

Fuckheads.
nwspaprtaxis 26th-Apr-2012 01:02 pm (UTC)
the least you could do is take one minute to have the parent explain and not work the child into hysterics

+1 and my thoughts exactly. I'm not taking sides and have my own opinions but I can understand (sort of, not really but kinda) the need for pat downs in general and perhaps "terrorists" using children as decoys.... but, really, have the trusted adult EXPLAIN it to the child so there isn't hysterics or this type of situation. But that would be too rational and common sense.
nahele_101 26th-Apr-2012 12:58 pm (UTC)
Thugs
Search
Always?

TSA, what is it good for? Absolutely nothing!

Porno scan or government sanctioned grope! Your choice, or sometimes both!
sestree It's worse than you think26th-Apr-2012 02:20 pm (UTC)
Have you ever SEEN Wichita airport security? It's small. There is only one line in (unless they added a second one) and it was only 12 gates maybe? so sneaking something past security is pretty damned difficult. It's also a QUIET airport as in the TSA agents aren't routinely distracted by much of anything cept the few who trip the metal detector.

NO Reason At All to pat down a kid. I've flown through there quite a few times.
furrygreen 26th-Apr-2012 02:44 pm (UTC)
Well, glad to know the TSA is making room for all those Catholic priests who are looking for a new calling after all the heat they're getting. And it's legal!

Man. This is a great county. A place for everyone and everyone in its place.
nyxelestia 27th-Apr-2012 12:56 am (UTC)
+1
archanglrobriel 26th-Apr-2012 02:59 pm (UTC)
What blows my mind about these stories (and this is, what, the sixth or seventh one we've seen recently of a child being felt up in the name of security theater?) is the apologist stances that the adults in the situation are still giving to the TSA. "I know they just have to do their jobs and body search my CHILD, but they could've been..(insert useless modifier here)"
I don't get it.
What we need to be saying LOUDLY is that this shit is ridiculous and it runs contrary to everything we teach our children about how no adult has the right to touch their bodies in ways that scare them, make them feel uncomfortable and involve the areas that are covered by their swimsuit. I can't even imagine the detrimental impact having their parents or grandparents standing by helplessly watching as they get assaulted will have on these children.
So what's the message here? Bad touch is always bad touch unless it comes from an AUTHORITY FIGURE?
Gosh, that's such a great message and has worked SO WELL in the past.
fenris_lorsrai 26th-Apr-2012 06:37 pm (UTC)
exactly. the kid did everything they were supposed to do when touched inappropriately. screamed, made a fus, called mommy. and is punished for doing what she was supposed to do.

fuckers.
ceilidh 26th-Apr-2012 03:56 pm (UTC)
RAGE.
little_rachael 26th-Apr-2012 04:40 pm (UTC)
Oh my God, that poor kid. Fuck those people.
poetic_pixie_13 26th-Apr-2012 04:44 pm (UTC)
I fucking hate everything. Fuck fuck fuck.
mskye 26th-Apr-2012 04:54 pm (UTC)
Jesus. At least the guards on the fake children's book cover appear to be calmly explaining the situation to the kid! I mean, seriously! How hard is that?

Edited to fix borked html.

Edited at 2012-04-26 04:55 pm (UTC)
effervescent 26th-Apr-2012 05:40 pm (UTC)
When are they going to realise that they need better guidelines and to start disciplining these idiots? And I'm talking severe discipline, since nothing else seems to be getting through to them. If you have a person calling a four year old an 'uncooperative suspect', I'm not sure they're intelligent enough for the job. Is none of this on camera for someone with sense to review?
recorded 26th-Apr-2012 06:04 pm (UTC)


My boyfriend's father is a pilot and he learned to be a pilot too. They're all about flying places, but I couldn't be bothered srsly. Airport security is unnecessary and only an IMAGE of safety via control. Also, here is a video that shows just how useless this stuff is.
kitanabychoice 26th-Apr-2012 06:16 pm (UTC)
that gif brought a much-needed smile to my face
spiffynamehere 26th-Apr-2012 07:06 pm (UTC)
I hate this world.
mirhanda 26th-Apr-2012 06:52 pm (UTC)
When are our lawmakers going to rein in this crap. It does absolutely nothing to make flying safer, it just annoys normal people and invades our privacy. For pete's sake you can't bring a bottle of water/soda/whatever from home, and don't tell me the highway robbers selling beverages at the airport didn't line some pockets to get that little rule stuck in there!
lil_insanity 26th-Apr-2012 09:02 pm (UTC)
I always bring an empty bottle and fill it up at the water fountain after I'm through security. I'm not paying $5 for a 20oz bottle of water!
baked_goldfish 26th-Apr-2012 10:05 pm (UTC)
When are our lawmakers going to rein in this crap.

When it stops being profitable. Michael Chertoff made some serious cash over those porno-scanners being installed, they'd love if people were put off from pat-downs and "chose" the completely useless scanners instead.
roguebelle 26th-Apr-2012 07:01 pm (UTC)
This is just so flatly absurd -- and what it proves is that thinking doesn't enter their process at all. A human person resisted screening, therefore they had to go through with the aggressive patdown. Because that's what the rules say! No cognitive functioning required!

That poor child. Does exactly what you're supposed to do when you feel in danger, and she gets in trouble for it.
froda_baggins 26th-Apr-2012 07:05 pm (UTC)
Fuck this security theater bullshit.

Fuck it.
lozbabie 27th-Apr-2012 01:04 am (UTC)
Honestly the terrorists have won.

If maintaining your 'freedom' involves terrorizing a four year old child then they have won.

TSA and the American govt congratulations you are continuing to spit on the graves of every person who died, every firefighter and police officer who ran to help and every person who swore not to let them win. Because with this bullshit they have won.
normaltrouble 28th-Apr-2012 08:54 am (UTC)
I agree.

masakochan 27th-Apr-2012 02:02 am (UTC)
Stuff like this makes me dread having to take a flight since I've got Tactile Defensive Disorder. Uggggghhh.
redheadedfemme 28th-Apr-2012 10:34 pm (UTC)
This is just proof that the TSA, and the Department of Homeland Security for that matter, has outlived its usefulness (if it ever had any) and should be abolished.
This page was loaded May 23rd 2013, 5:15 am GMT.