ONTD Political

Boris is re-elected and other electoral matters

11:30 am - 05/05/2012

Boris Johnson has won a second term as London mayor, beating Labour rival Ken Livingstone by 3%, after a far closer contest than expected.

Mr Johnson won on second preference votes after failing to gain more than 50% in the first round.

He bucked the national trend after heavy Tory losses elsewhere.



Lib Dem Brian Paddick saw his vote collapse and he was beaten into fourth place by Green Jenny Jones, with independent Siobhan Benita fifth.

Mr Johnson's victory comes after a dismal night at the polls for Conservatives across England, Scotland and Wales, as Labour seized control of 32 councils.

Labour also saw a significant boost in their vote across London in the Assembly elections - but many of the party's voters appear to have shunned Ken Livingstone when it came to choosing a mayor.

In other developments:

  • Labour gained 823 councillors nationally, as the Tories lost 405 and the Lib Dems 336
  • Labour had a projected 38% national share of the vote, up three points, with the Tories down four on 31% and the Lib Dems unchanged on 16%
  • The Lib Dems were the big losers in Scotland, where Labour and the Scottish National Party made big gains
  • Voters in Birmingham, Sheffield, Newcastle, Wakefield, Manchester, Nottingham, Bradford, Leeds and Coventry rejected the mayoral system - but Bristol voted in favour and Doncaster voted to keep theirs
  • Labour made substantial gains in Wales, including taking Cardiff

Mr Johnson gained 44% of first preference votes, to Ken Livingstone's 40.3%. After second preferences came into play, Mr Johnson gained a total of 1,054,811 votes, or 51.5%, to the Labour candidate's 48.5% - making it an even closer contest than in 2008.

He outperformed the Conservative Party as a whole across the country, and was asked by the BBC's Evan Davis, after his victory, why that might be.

"I think the mayoral election is genuinely an election between two candidates who are, as you can see, for one reason or another, thought to be distinct from their parties in some senses - you saw that with both Livingstone and to an extent me," he said.

"But my programme is absolutely, avowedly conservative with a big C or a small c."

There has been speculation that Mr Johnson could be a future Conservative Party leader, but he told the BBC he was dedicating himself to London and people could "take it for granted" that he would not stand as an MP at the 2015 general election.

Conservative Home Secretary Theresa May said Mr Johnson's victory was "a great result", and admitted it had been "a difficult set of elections for us this time round".

"We recognise that, but it was difficult times and it was against a very hard backdrop," she said.

Mr Johnson failed to secure the massive win predicted by some opinion polls - and at one stage, as the count was delayed, it looked as if the Labour candidate might overtake him.


Mr Livingstone announced his apparent retirement from frontline politics in his losing speech, saying "this will be my last election".

Later, he apologised for failing to secure victory, but said the campaign had been "vicious and unpleasant" and blamed "incredibly slanted" media coverage which he said had led to his key pledge - to cut fares - being "marginalised".

He said that as mayor, Mr Johnson had "carried on opening the things I started", but not done anything to plan ahead for London's future.

Continue reading the main story
NamePartyVotes
JohnsonCON1,054,811
LivingstoneLAB992,273

"If we have another four years like that, then by the end of this decade London will be insuffferable. The population's growing, you've got to massively expand housing, you've go to expand the transport capacity.

"It will be the mayor two down the road from here who then faces a real crisis."

Labour's London-wide Assembly vote was up 14.3% on 2008, while the Conservatives were down 4.7%.

Labour MP for Hackney North and Stoke Newington Diane Abbott - told BBC Breakfast there had been a "relentless media campaign" against Mr Livingstone but that people across the country were turning away from the coalition government.

"Whereas these local elections have proved to the Labour Party that we're going in the right direction - even if we've still got a lot to do - they're proving to Cameron that he's in the wrong direction," she said.

The BBC's political correspondent Tim Reid said there was now huge pressure on both David Cameron and Nick Clegg to change course and drop certain policies from next week's Queen's Speech.

Some backbench Conservatives are urging Mr Cameron to abandon more liberal-minded policies like gay marriage, while some Lib Dems want Mr Clegg to put greater distance between them and the Tories.


Labour secured eight of the London Assembly's 14 first-past-the-post constituencies, gaining two from the Tories, which left them with six.

The 38.1% turnout in London was down 6.7% on 2008 when Mr Johnson and Mr Livingstone last went head-to-head in the race for City Hall.


To cap a dreadful night at the polls for the Liberal Democrats, mayoral candidate Brian Paddick lost more than half of his 2008 vote.

Independent Siobhan Benita, a political newcomer, was the surprise package of the night, threatening at one point to come third ahead of Mr Paddick and the Green's Jenny Jones.

She has told the BBC she plans to stand again in 2016, adding that people were "disillusioned with party politics" and wanted "a new type of public leader".

UKIP's hopes of returning to the London Assembly appear to have been dashed - but the party blamed an administrative blunder by their officials, which led to candidates being listed as "Fresh choice for London" rather than UKIP.



valwell0trasher 5th-May-2012 12:59 pm (UTC)
ragnor144 5th-May-2012 02:46 pm (UTC)
+1
dark_puck 5th-May-2012 01:21 pm (UTC)
Is it me, or is the formatting on this really fucked up?

On my Flist I just get a HUGE blank space until the end of my tag list, when suddenly it appears; one the page itself there seems to be some really fucked up unordered list tags going on.
x_butterfly19_x 5th-May-2012 01:42 pm (UTC)
It's not quite that bad for me but it looks a bit dodgy. Will adjust.

/adjusted, hope that is a bit better

Edited at 2012-05-05 01:46 pm (UTC)
premor 5th-May-2012 01:40 pm (UTC)
There has been speculation that Mr Johnson could be a future Conservative Party leader

...srsly?
x_butterfly19_x 5th-May-2012 01:41 pm (UTC)
They were getting all carried away because evidence seems to show that Boris is more electable as a personality than the entire rest of the Tory party as a concept.
the_gabih 5th-May-2012 02:08 pm (UTC)
The thing with Boris is that it's not about him being a Conservative, it's about nobody giving a flying fuck about Ken. God knows why Labour and co put him forward, but they don't seem to understand that they lost not because of policy, or entirely because of media bias, but because everyone's just bloody sick of their candidate.
sparkindarkness 5th-May-2012 02:26 pm (UTC)
This. There's a huge vote against Ken - why why why did Labour choose this man of all people to run?
ceilidh_ann 6th-May-2012 01:01 am (UTC)
The vote to pick a candidate was bang in the middle of the leadership race so I think it got side-lined. I wasn't a fan of the choice either but I struggle to think of a candidate who could have done it, and he did a lot better than anticipated.
myste_uk 5th-May-2012 02:55 pm (UTC)
This. My first pref vote was Siobhan Benita, and second pref Boris, simply because I'd rather him than Ken, and it was obviously a 2 person race. Sucks.

Also a bit irritated at the way both BBC and Sky cut off the speeches following the declaration as soon as Siobhan Benita started speaking... she had almost as many votes as 3rd and 4th placed candidates, but we got to hear their speeches and not hers? Fucked up if you ask me.

Glad she's planning to stand next time round.. really hope we hear more from/of her over the next few years.
agentsculder 5th-May-2012 03:09 pm (UTC)
As someone who doesn't know a lot about the UK electoral system (I'm from the US), do these results create any pressure for parliamentary elections? I know the UK doesn't have those on a set schedule like we do here, but I would think given the fact the Tories and the Lib Dems got their collective butts kicked, it would signal there can't much confidence in the current government.

If anyone would care to enlighten me, I would be much appreciative.
myste_uk 5th-May-2012 03:36 pm (UTC)
It does indeed indicate that there's a lot of discontent with the current government, but no it won't mean any change to when we next have a parliamentary election - the coalition is in power for a fixed 5 year term (next general election is 7th May 2015). The only way we would have one sooner is in circumstances that won't happen eg if 2/3rds majority of MPs vote for an early election - this is part of why the coalition was important to the conservative government.. they and the lib dems form over 2/3rds of parliament, wheras on their own they didn't reach that size majority so the opposition would be able to club together to vote for a new election).

However having the change in political makeup of local councils does make a difference at a local level. Local policies can effect us as much as national ones, although the local councils are under wider constraints applied by the ruling power in parliament. But they have some autonomy... so a labour council may fight to protect different local services than a conservative council, for example, but both would be limited in how much they can protect, so all have to make cuts of some form under current centrally set austerity measures. So in a way, these local election results mean a real loss of power to the current government, albeit a much smaller loss than if they were voted out of parliament.

I hope that makes some kind of sense ;)


Edited at 2012-05-05 04:28 pm (UTC)
ruby_chalice 5th-May-2012 03:28 pm (UTC)
Tbh, I think the NATIONAL results are far more important/noteworthy than the London Mayoral Election. The 'Boris & Ken Show' only affects Londoners. Frankly the coverage they get on all the major news channels is bizarre. Both are arseholes imo. And if even a small percentage of the country think that Boris Johnson is a potential future canditate for No10 then we are fucking doomed.
x_butterfly19_x 5th-May-2012 03:59 pm (UTC)
IA. Overall Labour made huge gains and the Lib Dems were sqeezed almost entirely out of the picture. The Coalition are slumping.
pageup 5th-May-2012 05:54 pm (UTC)
Well we know the Olympics will a have comedy element now.
x_butterfly19_x 5th-May-2012 05:58 pm (UTC)
oh God
is the Mayor definitely involved?
pageup 5th-May-2012 06:00 pm (UTC)
Yup, the flag handover is a Mayor thing for definite and I think there's maybe a speech required.
x_butterfly19_x 5th-May-2012 06:02 pm (UTC)
well that will be interesting
pageup 5th-May-2012 06:04 pm (UTC)
That's a polite word for it. I remember him in Beijing and he made such a monumental arse of waving the big Olympic flag during that handover, and no speaking was required there. I dread to think what will happen if he opens his mouth.
x_butterfly19_x 5th-May-2012 06:07 pm (UTC)
he'll probably applaud the 'neo-victorian' work ethics of the people who constructed the Olympic Village
pageup 5th-May-2012 06:13 pm (UTC)
I pity poor Danny Boyle having to deal with Boris. I wonder how often he'll ponder re-enacting the arm cutting scene in 127 Hours but with Boris' head instead.
x_butterfly19_x 5th-May-2012 06:21 pm (UTC)
ohhh

;)

but ia, I imagine that could get trying
karaadora 5th-May-2012 07:01 pm (UTC)
I would support this. A lot.
ceilidh_ann 6th-May-2012 01:07 am (UTC)
Wiff-waff!
ceilidh_ann 6th-May-2012 01:06 am (UTC)
If you needed any further proof that the media is too London-centric, check out the Mayoral election coverage. In no way was it indicative of a national trend in the way the local elections were. If the race showed anything, it might have been its influence in so many cities voting no to their own mayoral system.

I did enjoy the sheer amount of desperate Tory spin on the Labour landslide. Warsi said it'd be a shambles for Labour if they got less than 700 gains. They got 823. Not too shabby. Also worth noting Glasgow City Council stayed Labour despite SNP's desperate push to take the city (oh, Salmond's smug back-tracking was glorious!), and did better in Scotland than anticipated. But as far as some Tories are concerned, anything less than winning all the seats, London mayor, X Factor winner and President of France is a sign of Miliband's weakness. #savedave

Also, Tory MPs who seriously think gay marriage and lord's reform were to blame for their losses - what's the weather like on your planet?
octoberstarlite 6th-May-2012 09:11 am (UTC)
The attitude seemed to be, 'So what if Labour took Wales, Scotland and a significant section of England by storm, we got London so who gives a eff what they think or want.' Orly? Why am I not surprised?

I'm so confused by that reaction by the tories too. So more people voted for a lefter leaning party and their reaction is not, 'hmm, maybe we need to be more liberal? Lib dems what you got?' No, it's 'Oh no! We must be more right wing!' wtf?
vampirespider 6th-May-2012 12:59 pm (UTC)
Well, Labour's gains are nothing compared to UKIP getting 13% in the areas where they stood, am I right? So it makes perfect sense that if only the Tories were to move slightly to the right and maybe start yelling about how the foreigners are coming to get us again, they'll be back on top in no time.

< / sarcasm >

octoberstarlite 6th-May-2012 01:45 pm (UTC)
I just don't understand how these people got into a position of power. Their not smart. What is this fuckery?
ceilidh_ann 6th-May-2012 04:44 pm (UTC)
Here's the thing - the Tories didn't get London. Most of the city's assembly seats went Labour, some with huge majorities. Boris may be Mayor but the bigger picture shows London going Labour. They can't even stick to their own faulty narrative.
This page was loaded May 23rd 2013, 3:13 am GMT.