The publication of an article about a gay student in the yearbook of Lenoir City High School has provoked outrage, after one of the board members of the school wrote a blog-post asking for the journalism teacher to be sacked, and for a police investigation into the matter.
The article in question is about a student Zac Mitchell, who is openly gay, and where he describes his coming out, his family reactions, a cross-dressing experience, and donation to gay-rights organisations. A high-resolution picture of this piece, with the full text of the article, can be accessed by clicking this link.
The article was written by a female student who remains anonymous, and included for publication by James Yoakley, who teaches journalism at the school based in Tennessee, just outside of Knoxville.
However, one school board member, Van Shaver, immediately denounced the move in very strong terms on his blog, in a post titled “It’s not OK.” He called the publication of the article “despicable,” and called for an investigation by both school administrators and law enforcement into the matter. It is unclear what law, if any, the article is meant to have broken.
Mr Shaver said in his post that while some “may believe” it’s okay to be gay, “it’s darn sure not OK for teachers to be promoting homosexuality in our schools.” He goes on to note that Mr Yoakley refused a few years earlier an article about Christianity in the Panther Press.
However, PinkNews.co.uk has learnt that this is not the case. While Mr Yoakley refused to publish the religious article originally two years ago (which can be found by clicking this link), it was more on account of the fact that it linked a medical issue to a religious “miracle.” It has been Mr Shaver who has been arguing otherwise. In the end, under presser, the article did appear in print, according to the Student Law Press Center. What was censored earlier this year was an article defending the rights of atheism, and the separation of Church and State, which was voted down by the City Superintendent, Wayne Miller.
Mr Shaver goes on to add:
Some might think I’m intolerant toward homosexuals but that would be wrong. If an individual wants to be a homosexual, that’s their own decision and they will have to live with the consequences of that decision. What I am intolerant of is an adult, a teacher no less, inflicting their personal beliefs and sexual orientation decisions on impressionable students.
If in fact it was Mr. Yoakley or any other teacher who allowed this article to be published in the year book, they should be dismissed from the school immediately. If it is found or known that Mr. Yoakley or any other teacher at any time has had any conversations or discussions with this student or any other student about their sexual orientation, sexual activities or anything about their private lives prior to those students being of legal age, those teachers should be charged with child sex abuse by an authority figure and arrested.
Local news media report that petitions are now being circulated not only for Mr Yoakley to be sacked, but also to deny young Mr Mitchell the right to attend his graduation ceremony.
The yearbooks were distributed Friday. By Monday, local blogs had taken up the fight both for and against the article and the yearbook’s faculty adviser, James Yoakley.
“I have received an unbelievable number of emails from parents and concerned citizens,” said Steve Millsaps, Principal of Lenoir City High School.
According to students, who spoke to local media, petitions were being circulated urging others to tear the page bearing the article from their yearbook as a sign of protest during graduation.
The 17-year-old female student, who wrote the article, said in a statement: ”There have been threats made starting with, ‘If I found out who wrote the story,’” and hence, has remained anonymous.
Tennessee was about to pass a controversial “Don’t Say Gay” bill, which would have prohibited discussions of sexuality and gender identity through primary and middle schools, but it looks set to be dropped, partly due to lack of support, and partly due to assurances the sponsor said he received from school heads in the state.
_____________________
source had fucking had enough of straight people and their bullshit.
The article in question is about a student Zac Mitchell, who is openly gay, and where he describes his coming out, his family reactions, a cross-dressing experience, and donation to gay-rights organisations. A high-resolution picture of this piece, with the full text of the article, can be accessed by clicking this link.
The article was written by a female student who remains anonymous, and included for publication by James Yoakley, who teaches journalism at the school based in Tennessee, just outside of Knoxville.
However, one school board member, Van Shaver, immediately denounced the move in very strong terms on his blog, in a post titled “It’s not OK.” He called the publication of the article “despicable,” and called for an investigation by both school administrators and law enforcement into the matter. It is unclear what law, if any, the article is meant to have broken.
Mr Shaver said in his post that while some “may believe” it’s okay to be gay, “it’s darn sure not OK for teachers to be promoting homosexuality in our schools.” He goes on to note that Mr Yoakley refused a few years earlier an article about Christianity in the Panther Press.
However, PinkNews.co.uk has learnt that this is not the case. While Mr Yoakley refused to publish the religious article originally two years ago (which can be found by clicking this link), it was more on account of the fact that it linked a medical issue to a religious “miracle.” It has been Mr Shaver who has been arguing otherwise. In the end, under presser, the article did appear in print, according to the Student Law Press Center. What was censored earlier this year was an article defending the rights of atheism, and the separation of Church and State, which was voted down by the City Superintendent, Wayne Miller.
Mr Shaver goes on to add:
Some might think I’m intolerant toward homosexuals but that would be wrong. If an individual wants to be a homosexual, that’s their own decision and they will have to live with the consequences of that decision. What I am intolerant of is an adult, a teacher no less, inflicting their personal beliefs and sexual orientation decisions on impressionable students.
If in fact it was Mr. Yoakley or any other teacher who allowed this article to be published in the year book, they should be dismissed from the school immediately. If it is found or known that Mr. Yoakley or any other teacher at any time has had any conversations or discussions with this student or any other student about their sexual orientation, sexual activities or anything about their private lives prior to those students being of legal age, those teachers should be charged with child sex abuse by an authority figure and arrested.
Local news media report that petitions are now being circulated not only for Mr Yoakley to be sacked, but also to deny young Mr Mitchell the right to attend his graduation ceremony.
The yearbooks were distributed Friday. By Monday, local blogs had taken up the fight both for and against the article and the yearbook’s faculty adviser, James Yoakley.
“I have received an unbelievable number of emails from parents and concerned citizens,” said Steve Millsaps, Principal of Lenoir City High School.
According to students, who spoke to local media, petitions were being circulated urging others to tear the page bearing the article from their yearbook as a sign of protest during graduation.
The 17-year-old female student, who wrote the article, said in a statement: ”There have been threats made starting with, ‘If I found out who wrote the story,’” and hence, has remained anonymous.
Tennessee was about to pass a controversial “Don’t Say Gay” bill, which would have prohibited discussions of sexuality and gender identity through primary and middle schools, but it looks set to be dropped, partly due to lack of support, and partly due to assurances the sponsor said he received from school heads in the state.
_____________________
source had fucking had enough of straight people and their bullshit.
Of course... how could you be? :'O
If an individual wants to be a homosexual, that’s their own decision
Die.
and they will have to live with the consequences of that decision.
Let said death involve fire.
What I am intolerant of is an adult, a teacher no less, inflicting their personal beliefs and sexual orientation decisions on impressionable students.
Let me be the one to wield said fire.
I would like to help with this!
What I am intolerant of is an adult, a teacher no less, inflicting their personal beliefs and sexual orientation decisions on impressionable students.
Because inflicting your bigotry on these impressionable students is totes okay, right? Go grow some basic humanity.
Also, it's wrong to have an article about someone who is gay, but it's perfectly alright to have them about people who are heterosexual, am I right?? I seriously can't with the world.
Edited at 2012-05-05 09:52 pm (UTC)
Edited at 2012-05-05 10:19 pm (UTC)
thanks for listening!
fuck that.
Edited at 2012-05-06 01:53 pm (UTC)
Mr Shaver said in his post that while some “may believe” it’s okay to be gay, “it’s darn sure not OK for teachers to be promoting homosexuality in our schools.”
Instead, teachers should turn a blind eye to the bullying queer kids endure, because that has had great results in the past! Suicide is awesome, you guys! Much better than ~promoting homosexuality~!
Local news media report that petitions are now being circulated not only for Mr Yoakley to be sacked, but also to deny young Mr Mitchell the right to attend his graduation ceremony.
No, see, what priests do to altar boys is child sex abuse by an authority figure. TALKING is not "child sex abuse by an authority figure", so sit down and shut the fuck up, bigot, goddamn.
Look who's talking.
but also to deny young Mr Mitchell the right to attend his graduation ceremony.
Wait, what?! What the hell did Mr. Mitchell do, besides allow the young girl (who I feel sorry for, too.) to write an article about him? He's an innocent young man. The teacher is innocent, too. It's just something for the damn yearbook.
In conclusion:
Okay, am I misreading this, or was the contended article about a student? Like if the article was about a teacher's experience with their sexuality (while I personally wouldn't think it's bad and seriously wtf if they think it'd ~corrupt the kiddies), I could at least understand the rationale.
But an article about a student? One of those ~poor impressionables~ that this bag of dicks is presumably protecting? So, how is telling the kid that his story has no right to be told not "inflicting personal beliefs"? If you're so against gay material that you think it's okay to deny a teenager his place at graduation because he dared to speak about his experiences, don't you dare say that you're only concerned about the children or that you're not intolerant.
Ugh this is what I hate about shit like the "don't say gay" bill. If you don't personally approve of homosexuality, fine. But own up that it's your own personal morality, that objectively, being gay does not hurt anyone. Allow gay teens some support from teachers, so they don't feel like they are so unspeakably evil that the word gay itself is prohibited.
And then people wonder at the hell our kids go through with arseholes like this having such influence in schools? So beyond sick of it - we shouldn't have to crawl through fire just to live, damn it
THAT should have been the title, because it shows how fucking asinine these pea-brained haters are.
And that state is rapidly becoming a fucking embarrassment.
ALSO:
What I am intolerant of is an adult, a teacher no less, inflicting their personal beliefs and sexual orientation decisions on impressionable students.
You better not kiss your significant other in front of children, or proselytize your stupid fucking religion at ANYONE, becaues I'm intolerant of adults inflicting their personal beliefs and sexual orientation on impressionable children.
Edited at 2012-05-06 01:21 am (UTC)
But- but- but- are you trying to declare a war on Christianity here?
Edited at 2012-05-06 01:36 am (UTC)
You do not have the right to declare 'BUT I AM NOT -IST and/or PHOBIC!' as undeniable truth especially WHEN YOU FOLLOW IT WITH YOU LET YOUR -IST AND -PHOBIC ASS HANG OUT. The only people who can decide that is people who suffer from said -ism and -phobia and it is not static thing because we know people like you that would double-cross them if it means a certain opportunity.
You are a homophobe and very intolerant towards LGBT people. LGBT people are not stupid and see through your clear-as-hell bullshit.