ONTD Political

CDC Predicts Fat Shaming Epidemic

9:26 am - 05/08/2012
Fat Forecast: 42% of Americans Could Be Obese by 2030

If Americans keep getting heavier at the current rate, 42% of the population will be obese by 2030, a new study says. The increase accounts for an additional 32 million obese Americans and a whopping $549.5 billion in medical expenditures over the same time frame.

The rise in obesity rates has slowed over the past decade or so, settling at about 36% — or 78 million U.S. adults — in 2010. The new public health report presented on Monday at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Weight of the Nation conference in Washington, D.C., predicts that unchecked, that rate could increase by 33% by 2030.

“Should these forecasts prove accurate, the adverse health and cost consequences of obesity are likely to continue to escalate without a significant intervention,” said study author Dr. Justin Trogdon of RTI International, a nonprofit research organization, in a statement.

The number of people with severe obesity — those with a body mass index (BMI) greater than 40, or who are about 100 lbs. over their healthy weight — is predicted to rise to 11% by 2030, from 5% in 2010. (Obesity is defined as having a BMI of 30 or higher.) Severely obese people are at greater risk for weight-related diseases like Type 2 diabetes, heart disease, stroke, sleep apnea and cancer and, therefore, account for a greater proportion of medical costs to the country.

“They also have a much shorter life expectancy and generate greater lifetime medical costs, suggesting that future health care costs may continue to increase even if obesity prevalence levels off,” the authors say in the study.

Previous projections had estimated that more than 50% of Americans would be obese by 2030, but the authors of the current study thought that figure was high. To gain a better perspective on obesity in the U.S. and to make a more accurate prediction, lead researcher Dr. Eric Finkelstein, an associate research professor at the Duke Global Health Institute, and his team used data on more than 100,000 people involved in the 2008 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) — a state-based, cross-sectional telephone survey conducted by the CDC and state health departments.

The survey captured people’s self-reported height and weight. The researchers then also factored in variables that influence obesity rates like the prices of food, alcohol and fuel, annual unemployment rates, household income, the number of fast-food restaurants, and the rate of Internet use.

“We found that obesity is still increasing, but increasing at a decreasing rate,” said Dr. Finkelstein in a teleconference on Monday.

The data did not include children, so the estimates could be conservative. Obese children typically become obese adults.

The researchers hope their findings will spur nationwide initiatives to curb weight gain. “We know more than ever about the most successful strategies that will help Americans live healthier, more active lives and reduce obesity rates and medical costs,” said Dr. William Dietz, director of the CDC’s Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity and Obesity, in a statement. ”People need to make healthy choices, but the healthy choices must first be available and accessible in order to make them.”

Strategies that are known to help people stay fit include building recreational facilities, improving urban design, increasing anti-obesity social marketing programs, adding workplace health promotion programs and developing new drugs and technologies.

The authors note that their estimate is just that — an estimate. “We’re almost surely wrong in our forecast,” Finkelstein told CNN. “That’s the thing about forecasts — they are guesses. This is our best guess. The world changes, if new drugs or technology comes out, if the government comes out and makes major changes, lots could happen. If in fact we’re wrong and obesity rates are less, I’d be happy.”

The study is published online by the American Journal of Preventive Medicine.


Source wants to know if its font makes it look fat.

Here's a link to the original paper. [warning: PDF]

*turns off notifications*

Edited to restore tags.
lady_grace 8th-May-2012 07:42 pm (UTC)
AND WHY ARE WE STILL USING BMI AS A MEASURE OF HEALTH OMG.
spiffynamehere 8th-May-2012 08:14 pm (UTC)
IDK BUT OH GOD IT NEEDS TO DIE.
lady_grace 8th-May-2012 08:16 pm (UTC)
I just don't understand how medically-trained professionals can look at such a simple equation and declare if someone is healthy or unhealthy.
lizzy_someone 9th-May-2012 04:34 am (UTC)
When I was in maybe elementary or middle school, I read a thing in a magazine that was like, ~HEY DID YOU KNOW YOU ARE NOT AS HEALTHY AS YOU THINK YOU ARE~, and their evidence was that there are professional athletes (they cited some baseball players) who have BMIs in the "obese" range. In retrospect it's pretty mind-boggling that the conclusion they drew from that fact was "Even professional athletes are obese, so imagine how obese YOU probably are!" rather than "BMI is worthless as an indicator of health."
lux_roark 8th-May-2012 08:50 pm (UTC)
Someone I know online said that her kids had a BMI test performed on them! In elementary school!
thepuddingcook 8th-May-2012 09:09 pm (UTC)
Not at all surprised considering a woman my mother was talking to about her WLS pointed to her 10 year old son and told my mother she had been thinking about having the son undergo the surgery too...
13chapters 9th-May-2012 01:34 am (UTC)
What the fucking fuck. That is just so inappropriate for a kid, idek where to start.
amyura 9th-May-2012 01:42 am (UTC)
It's the law in my state. And like most educational laws and policies, it didn't actually go through the legislature-- instead, it passed through the state board of education. Kids are required to be weighed in by the school nurse in certain grades, and then the school nurse has to prepare BMI reports on every kid and send them home. Like the nurse has nothing better to do.

Parents can opt their kids out, but I'm not 100% sure how.
____jonas 9th-May-2012 02:50 am (UTC)
what in the ever loving fuck is this.
kaowolfie 9th-May-2012 02:32 am (UTC)
I got nothing. WLS killed an aunt of mine and it left her then-ten year old daughter an orphan, to be raised by my aunt's dangerous and abusive mother.

Trying to force it onto a CHILD is fucking abuse.
cuddlegrimm 9th-May-2012 08:29 am (UTC)
Adding to the list of orphans from WLS:
A close personal friend of mine died less than a year ago, almost a decade after her WLS, due to complications from that WLS. She had two sons.
Not only did the WLS kill her, but it didn't stick, and she was actually happy to gain all the weight back and then some because she felt so physically terrible when she was thin. :/

Wasn't there a study done that showed that people who got WLS had a higher risk of death than the normal population, even when factoring in ~higher mortality rates~ for being fat or some shit?
chaya 9th-May-2012 02:54 pm (UTC)
Sorry, what is WLS?
____jonas 9th-May-2012 05:47 pm (UTC)
Weight loss surgery, I think?
bex 8th-May-2012 09:55 pm (UTC)
Yes. There's been several stories in the news of parents being told their PERFECTLY HEALTH, slim, active children are "obese" simply because they're at the upper end of the weight distribution for kids their age. Uh, that is not how fucking percentiles work, you dumbass healthcare provider. A tall, lanky six year old should not have her mother warned that she's borderline obese!
yeats 8th-May-2012 10:21 pm (UTC)
god, i'm getting flashbacks of that terrible vogue article...
kitanabychoice 8th-May-2012 10:52 pm (UTC)
I'm pretty sure I know which one you're talking about. oh god, that article. *shudder*
dafairyness 8th-May-2012 10:55 pm (UTC)
The school informed my uncle last year that my niece was on the light side of weight distribution for her age. Then they told him something along the lines of "You're going to need to work on that." He was understandably pretty pissed.
gorgogliare 9th-May-2012 12:06 am (UTC)
The same thing happened to my mom about my brother - the kid has always been extremely thin, but he's pure muscle, very healthy. Apparently his BMI says he is starving. The whole thing is absurd.

Edited at 2012-05-09 12:07 am (UTC)
kaowolfie 9th-May-2012 02:33 am (UTC)
There's more reason to worry about a person who is very thin than someone who is overweight. Being underweight increases your risk of osteoporosis, at least if you're female-bodied.
perthro 9th-May-2012 01:22 am (UTC)
I don't recall BMI stuff in elementary school, but I think we did it in middle and high school. Ugh. Made my friend neurotic- and she's a med student now! The shitty part is, she's heavier than me, but wayyyyyyy healthier. I'm hoping premed helps with the stupid parts of things like that. BMI is not a very good indicator of health.
meran_flash 9th-May-2012 05:38 am (UTC)
Do you mean body fat percentage? BMI isn't really calculated by a "test."
lux_roark 9th-May-2012 04:34 pm (UTC)
I meant BMI minus the "test" part.
nonnycat 8th-May-2012 10:12 pm (UTC)
Seriously. I just got back from a visit with my psych who was lecturing me how I should be around 90-110lbs at my height. (Which is actually LESS than the BMI indicates for my height, and definitely does not take into account my large bone structure.) And then went on about how I needed to consider weight loss surgery... mind... I'm under 200lbs...
maladaptive 8th-May-2012 11:27 pm (UTC)
Whaaaa? Please tell me you're my height or shorter, since I'm 4'11 and "normal" goes all the way up to 125 pounds. I think underweight for my height starts around 100 - 110?

I've been seeing a lot of BS lately about how women should ideally be 110 pounds, and I'm like "you had better come from Lilliput, fucker, where everyone is shorter than average."
nonnycat 8th-May-2012 11:33 pm (UTC)
I'm 4'11. Yeah, she tried to say the range was 90-110lbs. Which is underweight. And by the altered BMI calculators I've seen, that actually include bone structure, my range is more around 120-130.

By her definition, I should be at least 30lbs underweight to be healthy. -_-
This page was loaded Sep 21st 2014, 6:19 pm GMT.