ONTD Political

Fellatio Photoshop of conservative pundit sparks outrage

7:20 pm - 05/24/2012
Hustler magazine is coming under fire for Photoshopping a picture of a U.S. conservative commentator to make it look like she's performing oral sex.

The image of S.E. Cupp - a contributor to Glenn Beck's online TV station GBTV - appears under the headline "Celebrity fantasy" with the caption: "What would S.E. Cupp look like with a d--- in her mouth?"

"S.E. Cupp is a lovely young lady who read too much Ayn Rand in high school and ended up joining the dark side. Cupp, an author and media commentator who often shows up on Fox News programs, is undeniably cute," reads the accompanying text. "But her hotness is diminished when she espouses dumb ideas like defunding Planned Parenthood. Perhaps the method pictured here is Ms. Cupp's suggestion for avoiding an unwanted pregnancy."

The image has conservative women crying foul. Michelle Malkin wrote that this is typical of attacks on right-wing women from the left, many of which are sexualizing and dehumanizing.

"Conservative women are waging the counter-offensives against leftist degradation for themselves that no one else will wage. Whether it's Palin or Ann Romney or Nikki Haley or S.E. Cupp or a local grass-roots activist mom, right-wing sisters are pushing back," she said.

Speaking with Beck about the picture, Cupp said: "It's just embarrassing because it will be out there forever. The fact that I work really hard, and I'm an Ivy League-educated young woman with a pretty good job doesn't matter when you look at a photo like this."

But Hustler is defending the page as "satire."

"I'm able to publish this because of the Supreme Court case I won in 1984, Flynt v. Falwell," publisher Harry Flynt said in a reference to a ruling that free speech rights prohibit public figures from suing over emotional distress intentionally inflicted upon them.

The case centred around televangelist Jerry Falwell, who sued Hustler over a parody ad that depicted him having sex with his mother in an outhouse.

Source
keeni84 25th-May-2012 04:20 am (UTC)
if they don't want to be sexualized, they shouldn't be working for fox news, or they should be wearing pants tbh


This comment is part of the problem, tbh.
atheistkathleen 25th-May-2012 04:38 am (UTC)
rme i don't mean women must wear pants at all times, im using as a comparison to all their women reporting being in miniskirts and showing cleavage and then whining about being sexualized
spiffynamehere 25th-May-2012 04:48 am (UTC)
...No.

Just no.
atheistkathleen 25th-May-2012 04:50 am (UTC)
do you live on planet earth?
spiffynamehere 25th-May-2012 04:52 am (UTC)
It is not a woman's responsibility to not be objectified. It is the responsibility of everyone else not to objectify her.
hinoema 25th-May-2012 04:59 am (UTC)
This, thank you.
ms_maree 25th-May-2012 05:00 am (UTC)
Pretty much.
atheistkathleen 25th-May-2012 05:29 am (UTC)
right but if you have huge boobs and you're wearing a low cut top with a pushup bra, basically shoving your boobs in everyone's face, will you get mad when guys stare at your chest? i've seen this happen. its ridiculous.
effervescent 25th-May-2012 05:43 am (UTC)
You haven't addressed what I said up above, though. Women can wear clothes that cover them from head to toe and still be subjected to this sort of attitude. It's part of the male gaze, and the idea that women's bodies belong to society and that men have the right to comment on them and harass them.

What you are doing is acting as though a woman dressing a different way would change things, but it wouldn't. You're deflecting from the truth, and that's that a lot of men will view women in an objectified fashion no matter what she does - which means that acting as though they 'deserve' it if they wear a low cut top with a push up bra is both wrong and stupid. It's easier to go 'oh, but if they wore ~this~ things would be different' than it is to admit the truth - society is full of misogyny and men need to change their attitudes and stop blaming women in general.

You said up above that you agreed with a commenter who said that women will be sexualized no matter what they do, so I don't understand why you can't see that if you really believe that, you'd understand that men need to take some responsibility for their behaviour, rather than women changing the way they dress.
thevelvetsun 25th-May-2012 05:50 am (UTC)
"I understand that the way a woman dresses doesn't actually affect whether or not she will be sexually assaulted.... but those sluts annoy me! I don't care if someone demeans them because I'm so much better than them, they're not worth me reconsidering my gross position!"
homasse 25th-May-2012 05:45 am (UTC)
right but if you have huge boobs and you're wearing a low cut top with a pushup bra, basically shoving your boobs in everyone's face, will you get mad when guys stare at your chest?

...Oh, FFS. NO.
astridmyrna 25th-May-2012 05:54 am (UTC)
right but if you have huge boobs and you're wearing a low cut top with a pushup bra, basically shoving your boobs in everyone's face, will you get mad when guys stare at your chest?

Yes.
zombieroadtrip 25th-May-2012 06:36 am (UTC)
... are you under the impression people can take off their "huge boobs" when they wanna look classy?
kitschaster 25th-May-2012 07:12 am (UTC)
right but if you have huge boobs and you're wearing a low cut top with a pushup bra, basically shoving your boobs in everyone's face, will you get mad when guys stare at your chest? i've seen this happen. its ridiculous.


spiffynamehere 25th-May-2012 03:57 pm (UTC)
Yes. Yes, I will.

Because it is not a woman's responsibility to not be objectified. It is the responsibility of everyone else not to objectify her.
teleens_journal 26th-May-2012 12:53 am (UTC)
I think you will find that it is you who are ridiculous in this post.

And in life.
amyura 26th-May-2012 02:02 am (UTC)
I have big boobs. Sometimes I wear low cut tops. The tops of my boobs being visible is NOT "shoving" them in "everyone's face," anymore than two guys holding hands is "flaunting their sexuality." People are allowed to go out in public looking like who they are and dressing comfortably.
roseofjuly 26th-May-2012 02:59 am (UTC)
YES

BECAUSE THEY SHOULD KEEP THEIR GODDAMN EYES TO THEMSELVES

If I like the way my breasts look in a low cut top and a pushup bra, that is NOT an invitation for other people to ogle and sexualize me.
seamouse 25th-May-2012 07:16 am (UTC)
+10, and thank you
narwhalhugs 25th-May-2012 05:35 pm (UTC)
Not to mention, that if I was to be catching someone's attention, as I have every right to... it's never for the random perverts on the street. Why do they think that I want them? They're entitled douchewads.
homasse 25th-May-2012 05:54 am (UTC)
Women are sexualized for being WOMEN, not for what they wear.

Please point out to me where people EVER say men shouldn't dress a certain way if they want to be taken seriously and not seen as sex objects. Go on. I'll wait.

And while you're Googling that, make sure to google "the male gaze" and maybe "feminist theory 101" and save everyone here a lot of trouble.
kitschaster 25th-May-2012 01:48 pm (UTC)
make sure to google "the male gaze" and maybe "feminist theory 101" and save everyone here a lot of trouble.


How dare you suggest she educate herself on these topics. It's not like she joined this political news blog to read all those horrible stories about how often men are gross and oppressive to women, okay?
homasse 25th-May-2012 01:53 pm (UTC)
Oh, but she already said she wasn't going to google it! 'Cause god, who wants to LEARN something, when one can just spew uninformed opinions?
kitschaster 25th-May-2012 02:03 pm (UTC)
Considering her hatred of Fox News, I think they're a good match when it comes to embracing egregious, uninformed opinions.

Very, very egregious opinions.
homasse 25th-May-2012 02:10 pm (UTC)
...Oh boy.
This page was loaded May 24th 2013, 4:24 pm GMT.