ONTD Political

Who needs Police, Firefighters, or Teachers? The Free Market will protect us!

6:14 pm - 06/08/2012
Romney Says America Doesn’t Need ‘More Firemen, More Policemen, More Teachers’

The last three years are the worst on record for public sector job loss, and the 700,000 government jobs that no longer exist remain a large drag on the American economy.

Today, New Jersey Gov. and Mitt Romney campaign surrogate Chris Christie (R) said that those losses meant the country was moving in “the right direction,” and Romney himself backed that statement up later, criticizing President Obama for calling for the hiring of more teachers, firefighters, and police officers, the Washington Post’s Greg Sargent reports. From CNN’s report of the Romney event:

Romney said of Obama, “he wants another stimulus, he wants to hire more government workers. He says we need more fireman, more policeman, more teachers. Did he not get the message of Wisconsin? The American people did. It’s time for us to cut back on government and help the American people.”

State and local governments have been forced to layoff mass amounts of teachers, firefighters, and police officers because budget crunches have led to school closures and the elimination of public safety departments. That has hurt the unemployment situation (which Romney also criticizes), considering the unemployment rate would be a full point lower without the 700,000 layoffs.

Romney’s honesty isn’t a new position for him or the GOP — he’s called for more government layoffs since the beginning of his campaign. But it’s yet another indication that Romney is more interested in continuing the GOP’s ideological battle against government instead of curing the ills that are plaguing the American economy.

Source: http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2012/06/08/496799/romney-says-america-doesnt-need-more-fireman-more-policemen-more-teachers/
layweed 9th-Jun-2012 12:52 am (UTC)
We should just privatize fire departments! Y'know, like in the movie "Gangs of New York", where they had fire fighting gangs! And they totally show up and FIGHT! EACH OTHER!

orrrrrrrrrr not.
beoweasel 9th-Jun-2012 01:14 am (UTC)
Yeah! And then, instead of paying taxes, you could buy contracts from different, competing corporations, who, in no way will ever abuse that kind of power.
mikya 9th-Jun-2012 02:16 am (UTC)
Or better yet, if you live in a sparsely populated area you'd get the option to buy from nobody since all the potential companies that could provide the service did the math and decided they wouldn't be able to make enough profits covering your area!
This page was loaded May 21st 2013, 2:17 pm GMT.