ONTD Political

Who needs Police, Firefighters, or Teachers? The Free Market will protect us!

6:14 pm - 06/08/2012
Romney Says America Doesn’t Need ‘More Firemen, More Policemen, More Teachers’

The last three years are the worst on record for public sector job loss, and the 700,000 government jobs that no longer exist remain a large drag on the American economy.

Today, New Jersey Gov. and Mitt Romney campaign surrogate Chris Christie (R) said that those losses meant the country was moving in “the right direction,” and Romney himself backed that statement up later, criticizing President Obama for calling for the hiring of more teachers, firefighters, and police officers, the Washington Post’s Greg Sargent reports. From CNN’s report of the Romney event:

Romney said of Obama, “he wants another stimulus, he wants to hire more government workers. He says we need more fireman, more policeman, more teachers. Did he not get the message of Wisconsin? The American people did. It’s time for us to cut back on government and help the American people.”

State and local governments have been forced to layoff mass amounts of teachers, firefighters, and police officers because budget crunches have led to school closures and the elimination of public safety departments. That has hurt the unemployment situation (which Romney also criticizes), considering the unemployment rate would be a full point lower without the 700,000 layoffs.

Romney’s honesty isn’t a new position for him or the GOP — he’s called for more government layoffs since the beginning of his campaign. But it’s yet another indication that Romney is more interested in continuing the GOP’s ideological battle against government instead of curing the ills that are plaguing the American economy.

Source: http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2012/06/08/496799/romney-says-america-doesnt-need-more-fireman-more-policemen-more-teachers/
one_hoopy_frood 9th-Jun-2012 02:46 am (UTC)
And people can't seem to understand why I'm not eager to accrue tens of thousands of dollars in debt to get a Master's degree in education when I know so many people with them still working retail right alongside me with my BA. It's bullshit.
koshkabegemot 9th-Jun-2012 02:47 am (UTC)
Not that it makes a damn bit of difference, but they're both Ivy League grads, so you'd think schools would be jumping all over themselves to get at them.

Nope.

Unbelievable. I'm going for my certification to be a paralegal since at least the law sector seems to be doing okay.
amyura 9th-Jun-2012 08:40 pm (UTC)
You don't need a masters to start teaching. Just a BA, passing the licensure exams, and some sort of 15-credit or alternative training program. You need a master's to KEEP teaching, but you're given some sort of time frame to complete it. You have a slightly better chance of being hired if money is an issue for the district, because non-Masters teachers are cheaper, and then you can finish your masters while working, while you have an income and course reimbursement from your workplace.
This page was loaded May 26th 2013, 4:04 am GMT.