ONTD Political

Conservative Teen Radio Show Pulled

2:08 pm - 06/10/2012
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

The 14-year-old West Virginia-based radio host who declared on a recent show that President Obama "is making kids gay" has been deemed "offensive," and taken off the air, by a second internet media outlet.

On Friday, Spreaker, a free audio platform that hosts radio shows, pulled the Caiden Cowger Program, replacing the page with a note that now reads "Spreaker has deleted this show due to offensive contents."


Cowger hosts a twice-weekly show. Last month, he declared on a show that being homosexual was a "perverted belief, it's immoral and not natural." As the Huffington Post previously noted, Cowger mentioned that he was previously friends with some kids who later came out of the closet. "They were not homosexuals [then]...they just decided all of a sudden, 'I think I'm going to be gay,'" Then he concluded, "I'm going to tell you this, guys: President Obama...Vice President Biden...is making kids gay!"

According to website Zimbio, Youtube deemed the video, titled, "Obama is making kids gay" hate speech and removed it from the site. But on Cowger's website, he claimed his YouTube account was hacked and then closed and Cowger has since launched a new YouTube channel.

Rhonda Mangus, the mother of bullied gay teen Michael Mangus, led the charge to remove Cowger's program from Spreaker. Under the Terms of Service on Spreaker's website, the site says user submissions to the site must not be "unlawful, defamatory, libellous, slanderous, threatening, pornographic, obscene, vulgar, harassing, harmful, hateful, abusive, racially or ethnically offensive or is otherwise inappropriate."


Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/08/caiden-cowger-program-pulled-spreaker_n_1582108.html
thelilyqueen 10th-Jun-2012 04:52 pm (UTC)
IMHO, sexuality's a complicated thing. A brew of inherent biochemistry, lived experiences, and social pressures. It seems simplistic to say there's no element of choice involved, ever (which is not what you're saying, but a position I've seen).

My view though is that that Just. Shouldn't. Matter. I don't care if my lesbian neighbor or FTM trans acquaintance or genderqueer-leaning close friend were 100% born that way or it was 100% a choice. Their consensual bedroom activities and self-presentation aren't infringing on anyone else's rights.

To draw a parallel, one shouldn't be against sexism because women can't help being women. One should be against sexism because there's so little reason to assume that, as a group, women are markedly over or underqualified to take on certain roles.
brittlesmile 10th-Jun-2012 07:34 pm (UTC)
Yes, but just because there may be an element of choice in some people's sexualities doesn't mean that this type of thinking (people are straight until they announce they aren't) isn't extremely problematic, especially when it's framed with homophobic ideas of what is or isn't 'natural'. I think it's important to analyze the ways that this thought process, namely that everyone is straight by nature until they choose to be a deviant, is at the heart of attempts to turn lgb folks straight and justify those attempts.

So yeah, although it doesn't matter whether or not someone chooses to be lgb, since it's not a bad choice to make, the specific rhetoric of choice and naturalness espoused by homophobes requires condemnation and criticism.
thelilyqueen 11th-Jun-2012 12:43 pm (UTC)
Oh, definitely. I just don't like to leave it at that, since (IMHO) it feels like letting them set the terms of the debate if I do.
This page was loaded May 19th 2013, 11:25 am GMT.