ONTD Political

Where's the Politics in Sex?

3:27 pm - 06/13/2012

What makes some of us uncomfortable with bisexual women? It is because we think they're either lesbians having straight sex or straight women testing out their fantasies on us before returning to men?

In today's post-modern, queer-focused world, bisexuality is being promoted to lesbians as the latest fashionable trend. This has resulted in lesbian politics, namely feminism, being passed over for sexual hedonism, where the only thing that matters is sexual pleasure and desire. Similarly, bisexuality is sold to heterosexual women as some type of recreational activity far from their "natural home" of straight sex. It is seen as "temporary lesbianism."


It is more à la mode to have sex with a man if you are a lesbian than if you're a straight woman, who is merely doing what she is expected to do "naturally." Lesbians having heterosexual sex are seen as transgressive, when in fact they are simply reverting to a traditional way of being a woman. For a straight woman, having a girlfriend on the side is almost like having the latest Prada handbag.

Camille Paglia, the most famous "anti-lesbian lesbian," has written reams about how she worships the penis and cannot understand those of us who do not. In fact Paglia, like many lesbian tourists who sleep with women on the weekend and go back to hubby on Monday morning, thinks lesbian sex needs to be "spiced up" by the odd "het" shag:

Women, I think, are naturally bisexual. You know I'm not telling lesbians to stop sleeping only with women, but to leave open a part of the brain toward men and accept male lust and find men extremely attractive and get horny in relation to men and ogle their bodies and do something with them, then sex with women will be hotter.

Has Paglia internalized so much anti-lesbian oppression that she, too, thinks that all lesbians need is a good bit of heterosexual-style shagging?

But many lesbians, and even bisexual women themselves, mistrust the concept of swinging both ways. One U.S. study of bisexuality, which draws on interviews with 400 self-identified lesbians and bisexual women, found that a substantial number of bisexuals prefer to hang out with lesbians instead of other bisexual women in social situations, and have greater political trust in lesbians than they do in other bisexual women. It was also found that "[s]ome bisexual women actually doubt whether bisexual women exist at all."

Whatever our views and politics about lesbianism may be, we cannot deny that women face compulsory heterosexuality from birth. Despite huge progress since I came out in 1977, it is still not really acceptable to reject men and choose not to live under their guardianship, whether you are in Saudi Arabia or the U.K.

When I write about making a positive choice to be a lesbian, and that I believe there is no gay (or for that matter bisexual) "gene," I am accused of being an ideological robot and therefore not genuinely sexually attracted to women. That is nonsense. I personally feel that straight women are missing out on the best sex on the planet, but that is their choice.

If we put aside lesbian feminism, the way most people approach sexuality is that they think we are straight, gay, or attracted to both sexes. For bisexual women living under the tyranny of sexism, choosing to be lesbian is a liberatory act.

Those of us who grew up in a time and context where there was a political analysis of sexuality were able to make a positive choice to be a lesbian. I believed then, and I believe now, that if bisexual women had an ounce of sexual politics, they would stop sleeping with men.


Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/julie-bindel/where-is-the-politics-in-_b_1589435.html?utm_hp_ref=two
trivalent 13th-Jun-2012 08:51 pm (UTC)
I think that it is a serious problem that women are pressured to be available to men. That point is a good one in this article. However, the article ends with statements that trouble many commenters. My take on what I have read is not that they disagree with that point (though perhaps some do) but are bothered by other points. Some of the points made bother me, and most of my previous comments on this article were about that. However, I completely agree on this point.
ebay313 13th-Jun-2012 10:49 pm (UTC)
I think you are right. As a bisexual woman, the concepts of compulsory heterosexuality, being taught to be straight and being expected to be sexually available to men aren't exactly foreign to me. I'm not angry about people trying to discuss this. I love discussing it. This article is a shitty as fuck attempt to do so, because the problem with that is not who bisexual women fuck.
tinylegacies 14th-Jun-2012 07:01 pm (UTC)
The solution to the problem of women being pressured to be sexually available to men is *not* to shame bisexual women for their choices though.

I don't see anyone arguing that pressuring lesbians (or bisexual women) into sleeping with men is okay.
trivalent 14th-Jun-2012 07:12 pm (UTC)
No, I don't think that is the solution, which is what I took issue with earlier. I don't think shaming anyone for their choices of who to sleep with, date, etc is appropriate.

No, and that was the part of the article some people were commenting on here - that it is bad that women, of all sexualities, are pressured into being available to men.
This page was loaded Jun 19th 2013, 3:12 am GMT.