ONTD Political

Olympic missile protestors march through east London.

7:42 pm - 06/30/2012
East London residents opposed to plans to site surface-to-air missiles on roofs for security during the Olympics, march through Bow in protest.

Campaigners say 1,000 people have signed a petition in protest.

Six sites have been picked for surface-to-air missiles, some in residential spots, including Bow and Leytonstone.

The Ministry of Defence has said the safety of the Games is paramount and a "broad range of community engagement" has taken place.

The sites include the Lexington Building in Tower Hamlets and the Fred Wigg Tower in Waltham Forest, east London.

The four other London sites identified as suitable for Rapier missiles are Blackheath Common; Oxleas Wood, Eltham; William Girling Reservoir, Enfield and Barn Hill in Epping Forest.

The proposals have yet to be confirmed.

'Adding nothing to security'

Residents of Fred Wigg Tower, Leytonstone, have launched legal proceedings in the hope of preventing the installation of missiles on their building's roof during the Olympics.

Campaigner Chris Nineham said: "We don't believe they will add anything to security. If they are going to be used they will explode over some of the most densely populated areas in London."

He added: "I simply don't believe that since 9/11 a security system hasn't been put in place to protect Canary Wharf and east London.

"If fighter jets are sent from another country I hope they will be taken out before they get to London."

When a major security exercise took place in April standing joint commander General Sir Nick Parker explained there must be a plan which could deal with "the unlikely but very serious threat" that might exist to the Olympic Park.

He said: "It's an air threat, really categorised in two ways, the sort of 9/11 threat everyone knows about, and also for the lower, slower type of target which might pop up closer to the Olympic Park, which we would need to intervene."

Source: http://www.channel4.com/news/missile-protesters-march-through-east-london

OP: The worry here with all this military build-up is that a potential terrorist will go 'I won't do that then' and try something else, more small-scale but no less deadly.
copa_cetic 30th-Jun-2012 07:10 pm (UTC)
I live in Blackheath and am pretty unhappy about this, tbh.
yamamanama 30th-Jun-2012 07:16 pm (UTC)
Who are they expecting, the Nazis?
not_emily 30th-Jun-2012 07:36 pm (UTC)
surface-to-air missiles

Seriously? Isn't that a bit much?
lamardeuse 30th-Jun-2012 07:42 pm (UTC)
What. The fuck. They really need SAMs for the Olympics? THEY THEY SHOULD NOT HAVE THE OLYMPICS.

Why do I think this wouldn't be happening if the Games were going on in Kensington?
mephisto5 30th-Jun-2012 07:48 pm (UTC)
No-one's going to bother with sodding missiles or anything so obvious if they wanted to attack during the olympics. There's going to be crowds of people flooding through the airports- the staff of which are overworked already, so there won't be full security checks. I highly doubt every single volunteer for the olympics has had extensive vetting either, nor everyone who's bought a ticket. If there's going to be an attack it'll probably be either something smuggled in by one of the staff, or something let off in a packed station/underground/queue to get in before bag check. Those are by far the easiest targets. The SAMs are just military dick waving.
ljtaylor 1st-Jul-2012 10:30 am (UTC)
Agreed. Collateral damage if the SAMs were fired would be so great it's just...not even feasible, surely?
aoife 30th-Jun-2012 11:57 pm (UTC)
It's security theatre. Big and flashy and in your face, and makes it look like something's being done, because the things that would help are too expensive/complicated/time-consuming. Or we don't have the trained man-power available. Having military working dogs at the stadia would be more effective for starters, but as far as I'm aware, they're hard-pressed keeping up with the need for them on Ops.
ghost_busting 1st-Jul-2012 12:23 am (UTC)
I can't believe they're even the slightest bit serious about this.

I can't believe there was a meeting in which someone brought this up and they weren't immediate laughed out of the room.

I mean....seriously?!
This page was loaded May 21st 2013, 12:53 pm GMT.