ONTD Political

"McDonald’s reveals secrets of burger primping".

11:59 pm - 06/30/2012
Apparently there’s not much difference between a supermodel and a McDonald’s cheeseburger — both rely on stylists and photographers to look their best.

A popular YouTube video which has racked up more than two million views since it was posted this week takes viewers behind the scenes of a burger print ad for before and after juxtapositions.



It’s part of a McDonald’s initiative called “Our Food, Your Questions” which has executives responding to direct queries from consumers, such as whether the fast-food giant uses 100 per cent beef and real eggs in its offerings.

“Behind the scenes at a McDonald’s photo shoot” was triggered by an Isabel M. from Toronto who asked “Why does your food look different in the advertising than what’s in the store?”

A camera follows McDonald’s Canada director of marketing Hope Bagozzi as she buys a quarter pounder with cheese and takes it to the company’s creative agency for a side-by-side comparison with a burger made from scratch by a food stylist.

“That (purchased) burger was made in about a minute or so, the process we go through on the average shoot takes several hours,” said Bagozzi of the procedure she refers to as the “finessing of the product.”

The stylist uses the same ingredients employed in the restaurants — beef patty, ketchup, mustard, onions, bun, pickles — but assembles them as if dressing a catwalk model.

After melting the cheese with a blow dryer, he smoothes it with a palette knife and uses a syringe to apply the condiments. After the shoot, an imaging tech enhances the colour and removes indentations from the bun.

The result is a glossy looking burger that seems almost twice the size of the store bought version.

“The less amount of retouching that we do to something the less perfect it looks, but actually it looks more appetizing and more convincing,” said Bagozzi.

“The box that our sandwiches come in keep the sandwiches warm, so it creates a bit of a steam effect, and it does make the bun contract a little bit."

Source

___________
I know, I know. "But ladypolitik, DUH! I knew that." I know you did. But posting it anyway because found it a little fascinating that McDonald's is utilizing a sort of -- idk, reverse-psychology? -- to counter the understandable cynicism that informs assessments of airbrush marketing.

The secret isnt so much that there's priming involve, clearly, but more so in how they go about doing so in the 21-century. For some reason I presumed a lot more start-to-finish photoshoop'ing was involved, not the tedious  arrangement of actual ingredients. 
julietislimited 1st-Jul-2012 04:06 am (UTC)
Dude I've had some of the ugliest burgers lol

One time I ordered a chicken sandwich from there and they didn't even put the chicken on it.
ladypolitik 1st-Jul-2012 04:11 am (UTC)
HAHAHA yes, I pretty much stopped eating burgers unless they're from A&W (one location I go to manage to make them look commercial picturesque, hah), but I'll always default to home-grilled burgers whenever I can.
coraki 1st-Jul-2012 05:18 am (UTC)
When I was taking getting my BA, I had considered trying to go the route of a food stylist (since photography is saturated), but alas did not happen.

At least the food they are advertising has to be real. Like Orange Juice in the photo or commercial has to be real, but if there's an orange it could be fake. Since the ad is about orange juice. Makes ya wonder how long that Tropicana orange has been sitting around. Must be fun when it comes to shooting ice cream under hot lights (when before the law was passed, they used Shortening).
romp 1st-Jul-2012 05:58 am (UTC)
That's a law in the US? I wasn't aware of that. I remember hearing that ice cream was mashed potatoes due to the hot lights.

Why isn't Photoshopped used more instead? Is that a law as well?
merri_chan 1st-Jul-2012 05:46 am (UTC)
I've been craving a really bad fast food burger for like a week straight and this isn't helping.

But yeah, they use some really ridiculous tricks for food styling, like fake ice cubes that never melt for drinks, and misters to make the glass look like it's been sweating. I've been told you're still supposed to have 90% of the finished product straight from the camera, though.
ladypolitik 1st-Jul-2012 05:51 am (UTC)
Wow, that's a LOT of food styling for products that are to remain 90% real.
merri_chan 1st-Jul-2012 05:58 am (UTC)
er, 90% of the finished photo, I mean. They do all that work because photochopping it is actually less efficient in the long run, other than the really basic color editing and cloning out imperfections that they showed.
lizzy_someone 1st-Jul-2012 06:18 am (UTC)
...Oh my god she really does say "aboot," I thought that was a myth. IT'S OKAY, CANADIANS, I AM ACCEPTING OF YOUR ALTERNATIVE PHONOLOGICAL LIFESTYLE. VOWELS ARE VOWELS NO MATTER HOW HIGH.
rinygrin 1st-Jul-2012 07:46 am (UTC)
It's not a myth but it's not uncommon in the states either. I can't say I've ever met anyone IRL where I live who says it but that's maybe from living in Vancouver? Might be different in Ontario, rural parts of Canada, martimes, etc.

Edited at 2012-07-01 07:46 am (UTC)
iolarah 1st-Jul-2012 01:56 pm (UTC)
I'm in Toronto, and a lot of my friends in New York and New Jersey insist I say it that way sometimes, but I just don't hear it, nor do I hear any difference in the way they say it. Do they think they say it "a-baowt"?
coraki 1st-Jul-2012 06:09 pm (UTC)
I remember a guy coming from Canada to pick up supplies at the warehouse and he said 'aboot'. He was from Vancouver, but I imagine people in WA near the border say it too. Similar to Liverpool starting to sound a bit Scottish, because they're closer to Scotland.

I say some things different than people in the states, because my mum is Australian, so I picked it up from her.
sakuraberries 1st-Jul-2012 09:16 am (UTC)
IT IS. I'M HAVING HOW I MET YOUR MOTHER FLASHBACKS RIGHT NOW.

But this one time at college, I met the parents of this girl from Minnesota and I had a rather long conversation with them, and they totally said "aboot" so I guess it happens in the states too? But Minnesota is right by the border, so perhaps it's the mid-western border states? I dunno. It's fascinating, though!
iolarah 1st-Jul-2012 01:55 pm (UTC)
Remember "Fargo"? I was killing myself laughing because some of my relatives from northern Ontario sound just like that :P
redstar826 1st-Jul-2012 09:14 pm (UTC)
Yeah, I think it's pretty common in some northern US states. I have family from Minnesota and Michigan's upper peninsula, and they pronounce it "aboot" too
moonshaz 2nd-Jul-2012 08:39 pm (UTC)
Yes, the upper midwest. I live near Chicago, and I don't think anybody around here says "aboot." But up in northern MN, oh yeah.
quizzicalsphinx 1st-Jul-2012 01:47 pm (UTC)
My French-Canadian Shakespeare prof last semester swore that "aboot" was a myth, but she KEPT ON DOING IT.


(I love you, Jen, but you DID.)

iolarah 1st-Jul-2012 01:54 pm (UTC)
I had to watch it again, because as a Canadian, I don't hear it as "aboot" at all. I still don't hear it that way, even after replaying her saying "about seven years" three times :P (Honestly, I was just tickled to realize I knew exactly where she was in the city!)
runonmoonlight 1st-Jul-2012 06:45 pm (UTC)
Fellow Canadian here, and I did not hear it as well.

I'm wondering, and I could be entirely wrong, but if we're saying it with a short u, and others are saying it with a more of a OW sound?

blunder_buss 1st-Jul-2012 06:25 am (UTC)
I found the entire thing fascinating, to be honest. It really demonstrates how advertising doesn't bend perception just for the sake of lying (muwahaha), but for actual practical concerns. A McDonalds store has the goal of getting the burger out quickly, while the advertisers have the goal of making that burger look perfect. Of course you're going to come up with two different things.
scolaro 1st-Jul-2012 06:59 am (UTC)
MTE. I like the fact that they showed/explained the process instead of pretending you were just unlucky for getting a burger that doesn't look like the picture above the counter.
hashishinahooka 1st-Jul-2012 05:20 pm (UTC)
Yeah, and it seems to serve the purpose of making sure the consumer knows what's in it.
sitakhet 1st-Jul-2012 12:31 pm (UTC)
I remember wayyyy back in my youth seeing a TV show where they showed a few other food presentation tricks - like they used blow torches on raw turkey to give the crispy just-done-right look & colour, then put oil on top to give it the fresh-out-the-oven glisten.

They also used lipstick to hide the white/green spots on strawberries.
jesskat 1st-Jul-2012 05:57 pm (UTC)
Do you happen to remember the name of that show? Because I saw the exact same thing when I was little, used to even have it on tape. They had all kinds of other revelations too (like the scientific explanation behind how it's possible to walk on hot coals without burning your feet). I've been searching for the show on the interwebs for years, but can't remember the title.
xerox78 1st-Jul-2012 06:09 pm (UTC)
I remember reading about food advertising years ago in Zillions magazine. Stuff like putting Elmer's glue in cereal instead of milk so the cereal doesn't get soggy. What I most remember is for a pot pie photograph, they baked about 10 pot pies, then they took the best-looking crust, the best-looking meat, the best-looking carrots, the best-looking gravy/sauce, etc., put them all together, and took the picture.
abee 3rd-Jul-2012 01:58 pm (UTC)
Just have to share this!



More in the link!
www.walltowatch.com/view/5367/Advertisement+versus+reality
This page was loaded May 22nd 2013, 9:21 am GMT.