
Florida Gov. Rick Scott now says Florida will do nothing to comply with President Barack Obama’s health care overhaul and will not expand its Medicaid program. The announcement is a marked changed after the governor recently said he would follow the law if it were upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court.
“Florida is not going to implement Obamacare. We are not going to expand Medicaid and we’re not going to implement exchanges,” Scott’s spokesman Lane Wright told The Associated Press on Saturday. Wright stressed that the governor would work to make sure the law is repealed.
Scott told Fox News the Medicaid expansion would cost Florida taxpayers $1.9 billion a year, but it’s unclear how he arrived at that figure.
Scott said the state will not expand the Medicaid program in order to lower the number of uninsured residents, nor will Florida set up a state-run health exchange, a marketplace where people who need insurance policies could shop for them.
“We care about having a health care safety net for the vulnerable Floridians, but this is an expansion that just doesn’t make any sense,” he told Fox host Greta Van Susteren on Friday.
Scott has gone back and forth on the issue after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Thursday that Congress cannot withhold federal Medicaid funding from states that opt out of a requirement in the overhaul to expand coverage to those just above the poverty line.
On the day of the ruling Scott was cautious about the expansion, saying he wanted to read the ruling first. Then during an interview Friday morning on a Jacksonville radio station, Scott said it was unlikely he would go along with the expansion because of the potential cost to the state.
But the governor told the Tampa Bay Times later in the day that he was still evaluating the ruling and would come up with a plan within a few weeks.
Scott was vague when asked in the Fox News interview whether he’s been in talks with other Republican governors about how to respond going forward.
“Everyone I’ve spoken to is doing the same thing,” Scott said, but when pressed for specific names, he only referenced what the governors of Louisiana, Texas and Wisconsin have said in the past. His spokesman told AP he could not confirm what conversations Scott has had with other governors on the issue.
Scott, the former CEO of a hospital chain, has been a vocal critic of the health care overhaul from the start. He made his first foray into politics by forming a group called Conservatives for Patients’ Rights that ran television ads criticizing the proposal before it was adopted by Congress.
Scott has also complained about the growing cost of Medicaid, the $21 billion safety net program that primarily aids the poor but also picks up nursing home bills for senior citizens. The governor backed a push by the Republican-controlled Legislature to shift Medicaid patients into managed care programs, a move that is still awaiting federal approval.
Scott has rejected federal money in the past, most notably $2.4 billion for high speed rail. His administration has also said no to some money attached to the Affordable Care Act.
But Scott has said yes to money associated with the federal stimulus program and he has changed some of the positions he advocated during his run for governor. Scott also must weigh the politics of saying no to Medicaid because of tight budgets, while it is likely he will continue to push for substantial tax cuts between now and his re-election campaign in 2014.
According to Census data released last year, Florida had the nation’s third-highest rate of residents without health insurance during the past three years.
President Obama’s health care law called for states in 2014 to expand Medicaid eligibility to those making up to 133 percent of the poverty level, or $29,326 for a family of four. While estimates vary, the Florida Agency for Health Care Administration has concluded that as many as 1.95 million more people would join Medicaid and other state-subsidized health insurance programs over the next five years.
Most of the cost, running into the billions, would be absorbed by the federal government. The Medicaid expansion would not cost the state anything until 2017 — although AHCA estimates that changes to other state-subsidized programs would require state money starting in 2014. AHCA estimates that the overall cost to the state would be $2.4 billion between 2013 and 2018 with the federal government picking up nearly $26 billion.
But other groups analyzing the potential changes contend that state officials have “hyper-inflated” the potential costs because they assume too many people will enroll.
The ultimate choice, however, won’t be Scott’s alone. It will also be decided by the Legislature.
sauce
Tampa Bay
OP: WHY?? WHY WHY WHY?? Can states really do this?
They most they can do is to reject the Medicaid Expansion aid since SCOTUS said that was optional for the states.
And I lol'd heartily that that bullshit number. Isn't Florida like 1/2 eldery citizens that already depend on Medicare? It's all REAL LIFE TOUGH GUY bullshit.
GODTHE INVISIBLE HAND OF THE FREE MARKET WILL PROVIDE. If parents really wanted their kids to be educated, they'd find the money for private school.They also describe themselves as Christians too. I went to Catholic schools. We didn't read all of the Bible but I'm sure I didn't see the bit where Jesus said to the lepers 'I'll heal you...but it'll cost you your house'.
*five seconds later*
WE ARE A CHRISTIAN NATION! THE GOVERNMENT MUST FORCE PEOPLE TO FOLLOW CHRISTIAN RULES ABOUT MARRIAGE AND WOMEN'S BODIES.
This is also the same dickbag who rejected shit for a high speed rail THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN NOTHING SHORT OF A FUCKING EXCELLENT IDEA.
/Floridian whose desire to move grows stronger every day
Or... hey, is that grounds for impeachment?
Edited at 2012-07-01 12:12 pm (UTC)
The part that realizes that people in Florida shouldn't get short-changed is screaming, "Wake up Floridians, this is how much your governor cares about you. He's willing to deny you health care to make political points."
If leading Republican/RightWing voices can get away with saying that they *hope* the president's policies fail, or with saying that their *only* priority is getting him defeated, or with literally holding the nation hostage (damaging our credit rating in the process), what can't they get away with?
Edited at 2012-07-01 02:12 pm (UTC)
Sounds like he gets his stats from the same place Barney Stinson does.
pooranyone but rich people, news at 11.FTFY
which is super fucking funny considering columbia/hca's hard-on for committing acts of fraud and scott's refusal to take any responsibility for any of it.
sorry scott, but your crooked self shouldn't be talking to anybody about health care and what's best for the people in this state, and you damn sure need to stop talking like you have the real authority here.
*bitter Floridian*
No, but seriously: I really hope my plans remain intact and I can GTFO this state by next Feb.
Laxatives?
Even if that is the case, it will probably also save taxpayers millions in unpaid medical bills, higher worker productivity, fewer sick days, and fewer minor health issues blowing up into major ones because of lack of preventative or early care.
But anyway, I don't think that the state of Florida can just decide not to follow federal law - especially now that the Supreme Court has ruled it constitutional. They have no other recourse than to hope Congress repeals it.
And honestly? <$30,000 is still really, really low for a family of 4 to be able to afford health insurance. It's kind of disgusting that there is anyone in this country against expanding Medicaid to cover families that make that little and have to stretch it across 4 people.
i mean... i know that i'll be footing the bill for "moochers" or people who are too lazy to work. those are their concerns, right? but what if we don't care? what if I don't care because it means that whatever privileges are given to the moochers, those privileges will be handed out to me too. and not just them and myself, but also to my family and friends. everyone will be able to take advantage of those as well. and helping out someone is not a burden at all. they just don't want to foot the bill for others' health but their own, is what it's sounding like.
those other European countries with national healthcare coverage... they have a great idea to invest in their people. my hope is that Americans whose viewpoint is to "care about what's theirs and fuck everyone else" will have a change of mind and heart someday.
sorry for the tl;dr, this article annoyed the crap out of me when i first read it.
this is an expansion that just doesn’t make any sense,we don't want to actually have to do anything about it." fixed that for you'care' is free, after all!
Edited at 2012-07-02 06:31 pm (UTC)