ONTD Political

Chick-Fil-A's Brand Approval Rating Plummets After Anti-Gay Controversy

11:44 am - 07/31/2012
Chick-fil-A's anti-gay marriage stance has gotten some high-profile support by way of Mike Huckabee, Rick Santorum, Sarah Palin and other conservative lawmakers. But among their longtime customers, it's a much different story.

Polling organization YouGov found that the Atlanta-based chain's brand approval ratings have plummeted in the wake of Chick-fil-A President Dan Cathy's controversial remarks earlier this month. YouGov also reports that the company's overall consumer brand health among fast food eaters has dropped to its lowest levels since mid-August 2010 in the wake of the media firestorm.

Just before Cathy's interview was published, Chick-fil-A's Index score was 65, well above the Top National Quick Service Restaurant (QSR) Sector average score of 46. Just four days later, however, Chick-fil-A's score had fallen to 47, while last week, the chain had a score of 39, compared to the Top National QSR Sector average score of 43.



Among the other brands ranked in the Top National QSR sector are Pizza Hut, Taco Bell, KFC, Burger King and McDonald's, the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD) noted.

Among those not surprised by the plunge was Aaron McQuade, Director of News and Field Media at GLAAD, who called the results "reflective of an America that values and respects its LGBT neighbors and rejects rhetoric like Dan Cathy's that seeks to demean and dehumanize the LGBT community."

"The business world has seen what happens when an organization supports the LGBT community -- which is that the LGBT community and its allies will support it," McQuade noted in a statement. "Now we have empirical proof of what happens when a company rejects the LGBT community. The LGBT community and its allies will reject it."

Although Chick-fil-A's financial contributions to anti-gay organizations like Exodus International and the Family Research Council have been well documented over the years, Cathy's somewhat glib confirmation of the reports ("Well, guilty as charged") in a July 16 Baptist Press interview has since sent both the media and a number of LGBT advocacy groups into overdrive.

"We are very much supportive of the family -- the biblical definition of the family unit," Cathy said in that interview. "We are a family-owned business, a family-led business, and we are married to our first wives. We give God thanks for that...we know that it might not be popular with everyone, but thank the Lord, we live in a country where we can share our values and operate on biblical principles."

Since then, at least seven petitions have been launched on Change.org, a social activism site, demanding that universities across the country remove existing Chick-fil-A restaurants or prevent new ones from opening.

Mayors in Boston and San Francisco have also weighed in, telling the restaurant chain that they're not welcome in their cities, and the Jim Henson company, which had provided toys for Chick-fil-A kids' meals, announced that it would end its relationship with the company.


Source also has a video and a list of queer-friendly companies.

Tangentially: I am very pleased by the new trend to follow up reports of problematic companies/foods with positive alternatives. I hope it keeps up.
redstar826 Re: 25 LGBT-Friendly Products & Companies Targeted By Boycotters31st-Jul-2012 05:26 pm (UTC)
huh, wasn't Target criticized not that long ago for giving money to anti-gay candidates?
moonbladem Re: 25 LGBT-Friendly Products & Companies Targeted By Boycotters31st-Jul-2012 05:30 pm (UTC)
Yes to your question, and according to the slideshow:

Target

In May 2012, Target announced that 100% of the purchase price of any of its Pride merchandise would be donated to the pro-LGBT Family Equality Council. The American Family Association lamented that "Target is joining President Obama in ramming same-sex marriage down the throats of the American people" and urged members to contact Target Chairman Gregg Steinhafel, to "let him know that a majority of Americans oppose same-sex marriage and are able to use their pocketbooks to voice their opposition to companies that support it."

It should be noted that Target has also come under fire from gay advocates. In 2011, Lady Gaga nixed a deal with Target for an exclusive special edition of her "Born This Way" album after it was revealed that the brand had donated $150,000 to MN Forward, a group that was backing Tom Emmer's gubernatorial bid in Minnesota. Emmer was known for being especially conservative and not supporting equal rights for LGBT citizens.
beautyofgrey Re: 25 LGBT-Friendly Products & Companies Targeted By Boycotters1st-Aug-2012 06:05 pm (UTC)
OMG, this is excellent news. I have been avoiding Target, but this looks like a positive turn!
wanderinghope Re: 25 LGBT-Friendly Products & Companies Targeted By Boycotters6th-Aug-2012 03:45 am (UTC)
It should also be noted that Target is a huge contributor to the Minneapolis pride parade :)
dravvie Re: 25 LGBT-Friendly Products & Companies Targeted By Boycotters31st-Jul-2012 05:45 pm (UTC)
Yeah, I find it interesting that they might be changing their tune possibly?

I'm hoping at least. I rather liked shopping at target, especially because they pick up a lot of brands I like, but I always feel a lot of guilt shopping there, and I really don't want to go to walmart.
girly123 31st-Jul-2012 06:04 pm (UTC)
Walmart is objectively worse in every way, but especially insofar as queer things are concerned.

Edited at 2012-07-31 06:05 pm (UTC)
dravvie 31st-Jul-2012 06:12 pm (UTC)
Yeah, Walmart pretty horrible. I can maybe count on one hand the number of times I've actually shopped at a walmart in recent years and those were always middle of the night OMG I need something now, where's a 24 hour store situations.

It's hard since I've moved though, I can actually feel the lack of local businesses and options in shopping, (for things like odds and ends shopping you really have your choice of walmart/walgreens/BJ's or Target, and BJ's is a 30 minute hike either way and requires a membership, Walgreens is overpriced, so it's kind of get what you can where you can and get the rest at Target and feel like ehhhh, this company kind of might suck.) and it's something I hadn't felt before in my adult life with the exception of touring and being at the mercy of someone else.
teacoat 31st-Jul-2012 06:12 pm (UTC)
The reason they contributed to the group was because they were pro-big business, not because they were anti-gay. Which isn't much better since it shows that they didn't think the anti-gay thing would "matter," but it's pretty clear that they learned not to *publicly* support anti-gay groups, and that supporting pro-gay groups is good for business. But who knows what sort of 501(c)(4) organizations they're contributing to, since they don't have to reveal their donors.
dravvie 31st-Jul-2012 06:19 pm (UTC)
Yeah, I guess that's my big concern, is that they're using people's sexuality as a marketing point, and then who the hell knows what they're doing with their donations. If you're going to market your business a certain way, it helps if you actually believe it at the core of your business.
swanwitch 2nd-Aug-2012 03:20 pm (UTC)
That's why you watch the news for records of their donations.
sparkindarkness Re: 25 LGBT-Friendly Products & Companies Targeted By Boycotters31st-Jul-2012 09:20 pm (UTC)
I wouldn't be so sure. They've done the adverts, but they've ALSO gone on to declare their "neutrality" when it comes to marriage equality

So it's less "we support human rights" and more "GIMME YOUR MONEY!"
dravvie Re: 25 LGBT-Friendly Products & Companies Targeted By Boycotters31st-Jul-2012 09:32 pm (UTC)
Yeah, that was my real concern. Bleh.
girly123 31st-Jul-2012 06:04 pm (UTC)
It's legitimately a drop in the bucket to the amount of money they pour into local gay initiatives and causes, and they've since donated a bunch of money to a queer organization. The donation to the conservative lobbying group was less of a problem because of its ties to homophobia (because Target has been pretty queer positive from the jump and makes sure to contribute accordingly,) and more because it was signaling the deterioration of its comparably laudable practices with unions and the treatment of its workers.

Edited at 2012-07-31 06:09 pm (UTC)
rex_dart 31st-Jul-2012 06:26 pm (UTC)
Didn't know all this; thanks for explaining. It makes me feel a bit better because I just haven't been able to cut Target out of my life.
sparkindarkness 31st-Jul-2012 09:22 pm (UTC)
They have since declared their NEUTRALITY about marriage equality though - so I think there's a lot of gesture politics on their part
girly123 1st-Aug-2012 12:22 am (UTC)
Eeeh...actually giving partner benefits>a statement on marriage equality, let's be real. They've been on this since before it was cool.
sparkindarkness 1st-Aug-2012 12:25 am (UTC)
Having a neutral position on a human right isn't something I'd dismiss. Even if in their own company they provide some benefits, just being neutral on a legal change isn't something I'd praise
girly123 1st-Aug-2012 02:27 am (UTC)
I can see that. I suppose I'm willing to overlook it because of the huge amount of good they do in basically every other constructive respect.

Ugh gross I can't believe I'm stanning for Target. I just think that a lot of the criticisms they get insofar as their relationship with the gay/lesbian community are misguided.
girly123 1st-Aug-2012 04:20 am (UTC)
I feel you on that. I've had pretty good luck being able to pick things up at the local grocery stores or hardware stores, but the Target on Wilson is the only place nearby that has quality haircare options for afrotextured hair. Like, a whole section dedicated to natural and afrotextured hair. It kind of blew my mind.
moonshaz 1st-Aug-2012 06:08 pm (UTC)
Thanks for the info. It's great to know all this! *will be shopping at Target a lot more now*
teacoat 31st-Jul-2012 06:13 pm (UTC)
The reason they contributed to the group was because they were pro-big business, not because they were anti-gay. Which isn't much better since it shows that they didn't think the anti-gay thing would "matter." But it's pretty clear that they learned not to *publicly* support anti-gay groups, and that supporting pro-gay groups is good for business. But who knows what sort of 501(c)(4) organizations they're contributing to, since they don't have to reveal their donors.
This page was loaded May 20th 2013, 1:27 am GMT.