ONTD Political

In China, the rich and powerful can hire body doubles to do their prison time for them.



In May 2009, a wealthy 20-year-old was drag racing through the city streets of Hangzhou, China, when his Mitsubishi struck and killed a pedestrian in a crosswalk. The car was traveling so fast that the victim—a 25-year-old telecom engineer of a modest, rural background—was flung at least 20 yards. Afterward, bystanders and reporters photographed the driver, Hu Bin, as well as his rich friends, who nonchalantly smoked cigarettes and laughed while waiting for the police to arrive at the scene.

These images, soon posted online, provoked a public outcry. Anger over the callous behavior of these wealthy Chinese youths was followed by accusations of a police cover-up. First, the local authorities admitted that they had underestimated the speed Hu’s vehicle was traveling by half. (Incredibly, the police had first suggested that Hu was going no more than 43 mph.) Public furor rose again when Hu received a three-year prison sentence, an exceptionally light punishment in a country where drunk drivers guilty of similar accidents can receive the death penalty.

But the most stunning allegation was that the man appearing in court and serving the three-year sentence wasn’t Hu at all, but a hired body double.

The charge isn’t as far-fetched as it may sound. The practice of hiring “body doubles” or “stand-ins” is well-documented by official Chinese media. In 2009, a hospital president who caused a deadly traffic accident hired an employee’s father to “confess” and serve as his stand-in. A company chairman is currently charged with allegedly arranging criminal substitutes for the executives of two other companies. In another case, after hitting and killing a motorcyclist, a man driving without a license hired a substitute for roughly $8,000. The owner of a demolition company that illegally demolished a home earlier this year hired a destitute man, who made his living scavenging in the rubble of razed homes, and promised him $31 for each day the “body double” spent in jail. In China, the practice is so common that there is even a term for it: ding zui. Ding means “substitute,” and zui means “crime”; in other words, “substitute criminal.”

The ability to hire so-called substitute criminals is just one way in which China’s extreme upper crust are able to live by their own set of rules. While Occupy Wall Street grabbed attention for its attacks on the “1 percent,” in China, a much smaller fraction of the country controls an even greater amount of wealth. The top one-tenth of 1 percent in China controls close to half of the country’s riches. The children and relatives of China’s rulers, many of whom grew up together, form a thicket of mutually beneficial relationships, with many able to enrich themselves financially and, if necessary, gain protection from criminal allegations.

Full article at Slate
little_rachael 4th-Aug-2012 12:52 am (UTC)
It's like "The Whipping boy," only real life.
little_rachael 4th-Aug-2012 12:52 am (UTC)
wasn't meant to be a joke, by the way. Fuck rich people.
mskye 4th-Aug-2012 01:02 am (UTC)
holy shit
mutive 4th-Aug-2012 01:38 am (UTC)
Doesn't surprise me in the least, sadly.
nostopplx 4th-Aug-2012 01:54 am (UTC)
:)
sankaku_atama 4th-Aug-2012 02:01 am (UTC)
?
lafinjack 4th-Aug-2012 04:09 am (UTC)
!
romp 4th-Aug-2012 03:07 am (UTC)
Makes sense. Northern men hired others to serve their military time during the Civil War draft, yeah? What really matters, it seems to me, is how the courts and public opinion react to this revelation.
angelus7988 4th-Aug-2012 05:38 pm (UTC)
I thought this sounded very Gilded Age.
layweed 4th-Aug-2012 03:25 am (UTC)
No surprises there. I wonder if similar things happened in the US during the Gilded Age and afterwards.

then again, it's not like rich people can't get away with shit even today.
tnganon 4th-Aug-2012 09:29 am (UTC)
the wealth divide in the us today is almost back at the levels of the gilded age

so the answer is yes
evilgmbethy 4th-Aug-2012 06:55 am (UTC)
to be honest, "the 1%" isn't really an accurate description of the wealth inequality in the US, either. It's more like "the .001%"

but yeah. not surprising. rich people are disgusting and corrupt.
iamduvet 4th-Aug-2012 07:38 am (UTC)
?!

I don't think corrupt could even start to describe them.
lafinjack 4th-Aug-2012 02:36 pm (UTC)
It's catchier, though, and even if it weren't people don't understand numbers.
moonbladem 4th-Aug-2012 07:59 am (UTC)
Wait... you mean there are two sets of rules, one for the rich and one for the poor? That the rich don't have to bear any responsibility for their actions? No accountability at all?

Well color me surprised. I had no idea. No freaking idea at all.

Edited at 2012-08-04 08:01 am (UTC)
bushy_brow 4th-Aug-2012 02:16 pm (UTC)
IKR?

brandnewinformation.gif
beoweasel 4th-Aug-2012 09:14 am (UTC)
It's ironic, isn't it?

The excess and privilege of the elite, as well as the oppressive environment of the working class is what inspired the creation of the Communist Manifesto.

But here you have a supposedly Communist country engaging in practices that men like Engels and Marx deplored.
iamduvet 4th-Aug-2012 05:23 pm (UTC)
Ironic isn't it.
beoweasel 4th-Aug-2012 05:46 pm (UTC)
I'm not all that smart.
tabaqui 5th-Aug-2012 01:33 am (UTC)
That is simply revolting.

To be honest, i'm surprised rich Americans haven't done this. Though i suppose the fact that most 'celebrities' and rich folk actually spend only about .1 percent of the total sentence of any jail time they *might* get is pretty much the same thing, different execution.
bestdaywelived 5th-Aug-2012 09:43 pm (UTC)
If not for things like DNA verification, they probably would, honestly.
This page was loaded May 20th 2013, 10:05 pm GMT.