ONTD Political

General Mills Anti-Gay Protest Goes Awry As Man Lights Lawn On Fire

5:51 pm - 08/06/2012
Video footage of a gay rights opponent's protest gone awry is going viral in the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) blogosphere.



Originally reported by Good as You blogger Jeremy Hooper, the clip shows an unidentified man attempting to light a box of Cheerios cereal on fire in protest of General Mills' proclaimed pro-marriage equality stance.

"One out of every eight boxes of cereal in this country is Cheerios," the man states. "This is really the treat now for the homosexuals! And this is our protest of General Mills, because they're advocating same-sex marriages. So we are gonna torch some cereal!"

Things don't go exactly according to plan, however, as the fire quickly spreads to the lawn below as the man struggles to extinguish it.

Meanwhile, the National Organization For Marriage (NOM) recently launched a "Dump General Mills" campaign. "Your decision to pander to same-sex marriage activists has forced me to choose between your food products and my conscience," a petition, which has so far drawn over 24,000 signatures, states. "As long as food is produced by other companies my conscience is going to win out over the desire for another bowl of Lucky Charms."

I would honestly think lighting a fire (even if contained) in front of a business or building of any kind would be illegal. This guy should have been arrested on these grounds.

Video at source.
1carolinabrown 7th-Aug-2012 12:05 pm (UTC)
I'm not advocating the fire burning, but what I hear many of you saying (based on comments from this post and previous posts) is that it's not ok to protest General Mills, but it is ok to protest Chick-Fil-A?


boogans 7th-Aug-2012 12:20 pm (UTC)
People can protest whatever they like, most people are not going to be angry about that itself.

What folks don't like is the reason why these people are protesting General Mills.

Edited at 2012-08-07 12:22 pm (UTC)
bellichka 7th-Aug-2012 12:27 pm (UTC)
You can protest whoever the hell you want. People also have a right to vocally disagree with the protesting. And *I* personally disagree with this fuckwit because half the nation is officially a disaster area due to drought, and we've seen devastating fires this entire summer (CO, OK, etc), and yet this ingrate goes ahead and lights a fire that he can't control ~in protest~.
bellichka 7th-Aug-2012 12:29 pm (UTC)
Not to mention, protesting CFA involved not eating at the restaurant. For this chucklefuck, he had to actually BUY Cheerios before he could burn them... which defeats the purpose of the protest.
redstar826 7th-Aug-2012 12:35 pm (UTC)
I'm not sure what you mean by 'ok'.

Does he have the right to protest (assuming he can do so without setting people's damned lawns on fire)? Sure. However, that doesn't mean that his reasons for protesting are good or that we have to pretend that we are talking about ~equally valid opinions~ or other such nonsense.
1carolinabrown 7th-Aug-2012 01:32 pm (UTC)
Who decides what the good, equally valid and nonsensical opinions are?
livetuned 7th-Aug-2012 03:10 pm (UTC)
when you're opinion including blocking human rights from a group of people, it's no longer a logical opinion, sorry.
1carolinabrown 7th-Aug-2012 03:51 pm (UTC)
I absolutely believe in human rights. At the same time, I believe that there is a law of God that transcends all human logic,and in the end that's the law by which our lives will be measured. My opionions and your opinions are going to be irrelevant one day.

Edited at 2012-08-07 03:58 pm (UTC)
redstar826 7th-Aug-2012 03:11 pm (UTC)
That's the beauty of living in a free society. People are free to voice their opinions, and other people are free to say that those opinions are nonsensical. And there is nothing wrong with someone saying that they think some opinions are stupid. I don't see any value in pretending that all opinions are equally good if one really doesn't feel that way.
bellonia 7th-Aug-2012 12:55 pm (UTC)
everything the other people said

also it's not okay b/c he lit a lawn on fire.
jeunelis 7th-Aug-2012 12:58 pm (UTC)
No one is saying that they can't protest GM. Protest away, but when you start fires in a drought you are a raging asshole.

As far as I know, no one was setting Chick-Fil-A products on fire.
1carolinabrown 7th-Aug-2012 01:10 pm (UTC)
But there was an attempt to burn down a church...

http://www.wsoctv.com/news/news/local/failed-attempt-to-burn-down-church/nPFD6/
jeunelis 7th-Aug-2012 01:17 pm (UTC)
and what was the outcome of the investigation? Was anyone charged with it?

A mosque was burned to the ground on Sunday too.
mutive 7th-Aug-2012 01:50 pm (UTC)
I think it's fair to protest whatever you want by not eating them.

I have different feelings, though, about lighting things on fire on public property. Someone could have gotten hurt! (And yes, I'd feel the same way about someone trying to light Chik-Fil-A stuff on fire.)
1carolinabrown 7th-Aug-2012 02:27 pm (UTC)
I agree with you.
sparkindarkness 7th-Aug-2012 05:13 pm (UTC)
Because one supports the rights of human beings

And the other opposes the rights of human beings


Supporting bigotry, trying to hurt people, fighting against human rights is wrong, evil and disgusting


Fighting against bigotry, trying to help people, fighting for human rights is good, respectable and honourable.
1carolinabrown 7th-Aug-2012 06:32 pm (UTC)
"Supporting bigotry, trying to hurt people, fighting against human rights is wrong, evil and disgusting. "Fighting against bigotry, trying to help people, fighting for human rights is good, respectable and honourable."

Well said, and I absolutly agree. I also believe that God holds us to His absolute standard of morality by which we will be held accountable when we step into eternity. I also believe that a nation that opposes His standards will ultimately fall.

sparkindarkness 7th-Aug-2012 06:34 pm (UTC)
"God's standards" is a loaded phrase because there are many takes on what that actually means

And no small number of them are not compatible with human rights.
zombieroadtrip 7th-Aug-2012 06:35 pm (UTC)
What standards of morality are we talking about here? You gonna keep vaguely implying things or you gonna share how you really feel about all this?
violetrose 7th-Aug-2012 06:47 pm (UTC)
Will you ever stop being vague and dodging the question, and say what you really think?
silver_sandals 7th-Aug-2012 10:48 pm (UTC)
Guys I'm sorry but I am loving this quality trolling

1carolinabrown, I applaud you
1carolinabrown 7th-Aug-2012 11:04 pm (UTC)
And silver_sandals, I applaud you for stepping in and leaving a comment. Thank you!
bellichka 7th-Aug-2012 11:49 pm (UTC)
I know, right? New favorite troll, but I wonder if afa_mom just got herself a new journal. I miss her!
silver_sandals 8th-Aug-2012 03:45 am (UTC)
They're so tame and yet so frustrating. It's brilliant. Though I agree, no one could measure up to afa_mom :(
This page was loaded May 20th 2013, 6:15 am GMT.