ONTD Political

Pregnant Dominican teen at center of abortion debate dies

3:28 am - 08/18/2012
A pregnant leukemia patient who became a flashpoint in the abortion debate in the Dominican Republic died Friday morning, a hospital official told CNN.

The 16-year-old, who had been undergoing chemotherapy, died from complications of the disease, said Dr. Antonio Cabrera, the legal representative for the hospital.

Her case stirred debate in her country, as her life was potentially at risk because of anti-abortion laws in the Dominican Republic.

Doctors were hesitant to give her chemotherapy because such treatment could terminate the pregnancy -- a violation of the Dominican Constitution, which bans abortion. Some 20 days after she was admitted to the hospital, she finally began receiving treatment.

The patient, whose identity has not been released because she's a minor and because of the hospital's privacy policy, was 13 weeks pregnant.

The teen's body did not respond to the chemotherapy, and her condition worsened overnight, Cabrera said.

Her body also rejected a blood transfusion on Thursday, he said.

The patient then suffered a miscarriage early Friday, followed by cardiac arrest, he said. Doctors were unable to revive her.

Representatives from the Dominican Ministry of Health, the Dominican Medical College, the hospital and the girl's family had talked for several days before deciding to go forward with the chemotherapy.

The case sparked renewed debate over abortion in the Dominican Republic, with some lawmakers calling on officials to reconsider the abortion ban.

At the time that treatment started, Rosa Hernandez, the girl's mother, said she had been trying to convince doctors and the Dominican government to make an exception so that her daughter's life could be saved.

"My daughter's life is first. I know that (abortion) is a sin and that it goes against the law ... but my daughter's health is first," Hernandez said.

According to Article 37 of the Dominican Constitution, "the right to life is inviolable from the moment of conception and until death." Dominican courts have interpreted this as a strict mandate against abortion. Article 37, passed in 2009, also abolished the death penalty.

CNN
Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>
sobota 18th-Aug-2012 03:57 pm (UTC)
i wonder why other right-to-life activists aren't also against the death penalty, but this is a horrifying look at what anti-choice regulation actually means to women around the world.
bestdaywelived 18th-Aug-2012 04:38 pm (UTC)
Because that doesn't involve punishing and controlling and punishing women?
evildevil 18th-Aug-2012 03:58 pm (UTC)
Doesnt this mean the teen had a right to life and the doctors/politicians failed to save her?
sobota 18th-Aug-2012 04:01 pm (UTC)
shhh with your logic.
furrygreen 18th-Aug-2012 04:03 pm (UTC)
How horrible! That poor family! D:
angi_is_altered 18th-Aug-2012 04:05 pm (UTC)
And this is the kind of stuff that will happen in America if the Republicans get ahold of The White House.


“How far you go in life depends on your being tender with the young, compassionate with the aged, sympathetic with the striving, and tolerant of the weak and the strong. Because someday in life you will have been all of these.” ~ George Washington

vvalkyri 20th-Aug-2012 04:50 pm (UTC)
yep. Over on FB I posted a link to CNN's story on this, with the intro that Ryan has introduced multiple "personhood" bills, and this is the endpoint of giving a zygote equal legal standing as the being carrying it.
rebness 18th-Aug-2012 04:05 pm (UTC)
This is absolutely fucking disgusting. Her life meant nothing to these anti-abortion clowns in the end. Her poor mother. :(
koshkabegemot 18th-Aug-2012 04:06 pm (UTC)
This is so fucking sad on so many levels. My heart goes out to her mom and the rest of her family.
jetplanejane 18th-Aug-2012 04:13 pm (UTC)
This is so terribly sad and infuriating.
darth_eldritch 18th-Aug-2012 04:13 pm (UTC)
Her life meant absolutely nothing, only the fetus mattered.
kyra_neko_rei 18th-Aug-2012 07:15 pm (UTC)
And congratulations to the pro-lifers on saving the fetus.

Oh wait.
ladypolitik 18th-Aug-2012 04:19 pm (UTC)
Beyond upsetting.
elobelia 18th-Aug-2012 04:41 pm (UTC)
Way to go pro-lifers. Now the mother AND the fetus are dead. Really preserving the gift of life there.
on_my_heart 18th-Aug-2012 06:25 pm (UTC)
MTE
likeahobbit 18th-Aug-2012 04:57 pm (UTC)
This makes me feel sick. I wish so-called 'pro-lifers' would realize that if they had their way, this is ultimately what they are supporting. So sad.
violetrose 18th-Aug-2012 06:24 pm (UTC)
I think a lot of them do realise it, but they just don't care.
aviv_b 18th-Aug-2012 05:51 pm (UTC)
"My daughter's life is first. I know that (abortion) is a sin and that it goes against the law ... but my daughter's health is first," Hernandez said.

What a horrible situation. I wish I could tell the mother - its not a sin to want your daughter to live. Your daughter's life should have come first. After all, if she had lived, she could have, if she wished, gone on to have children and be a mother and you a grandmother.

And I would not say this to her in her time of grief, but fuck your Church for imposing its will on your homeland. You need to kick its evil influence out and find a better way. A way that honors living women, not just the fetus.
kyra_neko_rei 18th-Aug-2012 11:09 pm (UTC)
That is just . . . I mean, she's a mother who wants life for her daughter---it's obscene that the "pro-life" movement is doing anything but supporting her in that.
violetrose 18th-Aug-2012 06:23 pm (UTC)
God, that poor girl and her mother.

This is what anti-abortion laws eventually become. Latin American women in particular suffer because of the Catholic Church's massive influence over social policy. I really hope I can see something change in my lifetime, but idk.

Edited at 2012-08-18 06:38 pm (UTC)
flcadam 18th-Aug-2012 06:57 pm (UTC)
Geesh, this is really tragic. I think that abortion has to be one of the most morally challenging political issues today.
violetrose 18th-Aug-2012 07:38 pm (UTC)
Yeah, give a woman with leukemia an abortion to help save her life, or let both her and the foetus die. Really challenging.
oudeteron 18th-Aug-2012 07:12 pm (UTC)
So how exactly is this "pro-life"?


ETA-not-feeding-the-troll: ^ There's nothing ~challenging~ about prioritizing a person's right to own their own body and have that body treated accordingly.

Edited at 2012-08-18 07:14 pm (UTC)
aviv_b 18th-Aug-2012 07:34 pm (UTC)
MTE - The women is alive. You do not put her life at risk to maybe, possibly, create another life UNLESS THAT IS HER CHOICE!

She obviously wanted the treatment, her mother wanted her to have the treatment, the treatment is perfectly legal, To deny a living person life-saving treatment is morally reprehensible. There is nothing challenging about this.
sammet 18th-Aug-2012 07:38 pm (UTC)
This is horrible. Gdi. And instead on focusing on helping her, they both died.
Why does pro-life only seem to apply to fetuses? I can't with this logic.
rex_dart 18th-Aug-2012 08:02 pm (UTC)
Because "fetuses" includes fifty percent men and "pregnant people" mostly includes women. It's obvious what the more important group is.
metatrix 18th-Aug-2012 08:30 pm (UTC)
I don't understand...is it regular practice in that country to deny chemotherapy to pregnant women? Seems really strange...
violetrose 18th-Aug-2012 08:33 pm (UTC)
Abortion is completely banned in the Dominican Republic, resulting in pregnant patients being denied life-saving treatment because it could terminate the pregnancy, thus breaking the law. This also prohibits doctors performing life-saving abortions.
moonbladem 18th-Aug-2012 08:51 pm (UTC)
I don't see how anyone could call themselves pro-life, and still deny the mother treatment for her leukemia just because she was 13 weeks pregnant.

Besides, did it not occur to them, that if the mother died from lack of treatment, that the baby would die too?

All this pro-life bullshit should be called for what it actually is... anti-choice.

And this: "Representatives from the Dominican Ministry of Health, the Dominican Medical College, the hospital and the girl's family had talked for several days before deciding to go forward with the chemotherapy."

Shouldn't the decision on treatment lie solely with the girl and her family? As it is, them standing around and talking about it 'for several days' was probably the delay that contributed to her death. Congratulations, dumbasses. I hope you're proud of yourselves.
dearmisterecho 18th-Aug-2012 09:58 pm (UTC)
I can't imagine how terrifying it must have felt for her, to be so sick and having people go "nope, you're knocked up, we're not going to do a damn thing to save your life! BECAUSE LIFE IS PRECIOUS."

R.I.P. that poor girl.
moonbladem 18th-Aug-2012 10:05 pm (UTC)
"nope, you're knocked up, we're not going to do a damn thing to save your life! BECAUSE LIFE IS PRECIOUS."

And therein lies the tragic irony.
wrestlingdog 18th-Aug-2012 10:02 pm (UTC)
macro
lafinjack 18th-Aug-2012 11:32 pm (UTC)
christ_slash
ebay313 18th-Aug-2012 10:29 pm (UTC)
That is terrible. Her poor mother, I can't even imagine :(
vvalkyri 20th-Aug-2012 05:12 pm (UTC)
http://www.bing.com/search?q=acute+leukemia+treatment&src=IE-SearchBox&Form=IE8SRC
Per Mayo Clinic
Acute leukemia is a malignancy arising from bone marrow cells. Normal bone marrow contains immature cells (including hematopoietic stem cells) that produce mature blood cells, including red blood cells (carry oxygen), white blood cells (fight infection), and platelets (prevent bleeding). When some immature cells in the bone marrow become malignant, they reproduce in great numbers and crowd out normal cells. This condition, called acute leukemia, prevents production of normal cells.

Left untreated, acute leukemia can be fatal in weeks or months. But thanks to advances in treatment, acute leukemia is usually treatable and often curable.
(emphasis mine)



Edited at 2012-08-20 05:13 pm (UTC)
johnjie 18th-Aug-2012 10:59 pm (UTC)
This story is heartbreaking, and I feel very deeply for the woman who has now lost her daughter because her state was more focussed on saving her potential grandchild than her living daughter.
jwaneeta 19th-Aug-2012 01:50 am (UTC)
*cries*
metatrix 19th-Aug-2012 04:41 am (UTC)
Ok, so I wasn't really buying that chemo would necessarily even kill the fetus...so I did some research...

According to one study I found that looked at 216 pregnant women in their first-trimester with acute leukemia who received chemotherapy, only 11% of the pregnancies resulted in miscarriage, and 5% resulted in stillbirth.

Another study looking at 14 first-trimester women with acute leukemia resulted in one miscarriage and no congenital malformations.

Another study looking at 15 first-trimester women with acute leukemia resulted in 3 abortions (IDK if these were elective abortions or miscarriages), 1 stillborn, and 1 child with congenital malformation.

Yeah...given that the overall rate of congenital malformations for ALL lives births is 3% and the overall rate of miscarriage for all pregnancies is 15-20% ANYWAY, it doesn't really look like the chemotherapy for acute leukemia put's the fetus's life at risk ANYWAY.

WTF. this is SUCH BULLSHIT.
starzangelus 19th-Aug-2012 08:30 pm (UTC)
It is bullshit. But the fact that it was POSSIBLE that she could lose the fetus if she got treatment was enough for them to deny it to her.

Fuck them all.
Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>
This page was loaded May 20th 2013, 7:31 am GMT.