ONTD Political

Little late but since we're now embracing our new Lolbertarian residents, I thought it appropriate

1:25 pm - 08/25/2009

Daily Buzzkills: Ayn Rand (and Charlize Theron) will save us all


By Sean ONeal July 21, 2009


It’s almost quitting time, which means you’re mere moments away from shrugging off the working world and heading to hearth and home. But before you go whistling down the sunny side of the street, shoulders lightening under the lengthening shadows of another day well spent, we have some bad news for you, wrapped up in a last-minute memo we call Daily Buzzkills.

As our Most Exalted Leader Barack Obama tightens his sinister stranglehold on the nation’s economy, forcing America’s lashed and mewling innovators to bend like browbeaten willows before the all-encompassing might of his regulatory fist, and feeding ravenously on all of their hard-earned farthings only to poop out great lumps of communist coal to put in everyone’s stocking this Christmas, many conservatives have taken refuge in their scriptures. No, not that socialist screed The Bible. We're talking about the capitalist stroke-books of Ayn Rand, the thinking asshole’s author. In the wee hours of the morning, when they’re all chasing away nightmares of the federal boogeyman coming to take away their money and give it to heroin addicts who want to create government-subsidized drum circles, they hide under their goose down bedcovers with their rumpled photos of Rand—looking very “kitten with zero tolerance for charities” in her alluring dollar-sign pendant—and weep great, fat, Republican tears about the way no one listened to her when they had the chance. “If only someone had made Atlas Shrugged into a film,” they blubber, “the bailouts never would have happened.”

Weep no more, bruised and battered libertarians: After 37 years of being shot down by rational people who see the book as a stilted and masturbatory work suitable only for college freshmen who haven’t figured out that, if everyone did exactly what they wanted all the time, civilization would collapse on itself—and by the way, dudes, most ladies don’t enjoy being raped into submission, even by rugged industrialists—your sticky dreams of turning Rand’s rambling screed about the values of selfishness and laissez-fare capitalism into a brutally dull, unwatchable movie are about to become a reality! We know: You’ve heard all this before. In fact, not long ago, self-avowed Rand fanatic Angelina Jolie was attached to the film, but someone must have gently taken her aside and explained that it’s hard to be both an objectivist and staunch opponent of collectivism when you’re also asking people to give all their money to Third World countries or working closely with those evil cooperation-lovers at the UN— which basically amounts to criminal activity amongst the book’s more fervent fans. Thankfully those acolytes have a brand new, Teutonically ideal actress to provide the integrity-filled bodice of economically principled sexpot Dagny Taggart in Charlize Theron, and all will soon be right with the world.

Of course, there’s one thing that’s been standing in the way of an Atlas Shrugged film all these years: Its major themes are both reactionary and really fucking, like, insultingly stupid. Ha ha, no, just kidding. No, it’s the pervasive fear that all of Rand’s precious, life-changing, hippie-evaporating word-nuggets would never survive the transition to celluloid in the hands of those Hollywood jackals, who would most likely leave all of the weightier lessons on the cutting room floor in favor of a more facile, Fight Club-esque reading about individualism in the face of corporations and lots and lots of rough sex scenes—which is in there, yeah, but that’s not, like, the point. Fortunately, Theron is all over that one, already worrying aloud that a movie would lose the “nuances” of the novel—you know, like the scene where the book’s mythical hero of both engineering and “keeping it real” John Galt stands in a ditch and barfs out a 70-page speech about the awesomeness of objectivism—and making plans to develop Atlas not into a stultifying three-hour-plus feature film, but rather an epic miniseries on Lionsgate’s upcoming pay-cable network, Epix. Oh, yay. That should get every last drop of the nuance, all right.

Because hey, what better time than the Greatest Recession to sing an insufferably long hosanna to self-interest—to preach the gospel of laissez-fare capitalism, just when it was most recently proven to be so fucked in the head that even No. 1 Ayn Rand Fanboy Alan Greenspan seemed taken aback that he’d ever believed in it? And just because certain unscrupulous loose cannons took “rational self-interest” to its natural conclusion, and gave Rand’s beloved free markets a violent rogering worthy of one of her heroines, regardless of the cost to “looters,” “moochers,” and other “parasites,” it doesn’t mean that selfishness can’t work as a philosophy, right? Oh, except that Rand wrote in a weird, superficial bubble where every character was either a brilliantly creative, brazenly individualistic industrialist with a lean physique and strong jaw-line; an oily, vampiric, socialist-in-disguise; or a clueless sheep caught in the middle—and guess which one all the fans of Rand’s books tend to identify with? Unfortunately, you don’t see a whole lot of John Galts and Howard Roarks out there; just a bunch of fat, greedy corporate fucks chasing short-term profits to the detriment of everyone, then willingly getting in line for the very same big government intervention they used to bloviate about at frat parties when they were trying to get laid. (But, of course, somebody else is already making that movie.)

But whatever! It’s all totally prescient because Rand called this whole “government intervention” thing—and Charlize Theron is pretty, also; don’t forget that—and so unsuspecting people will be excited to see it, and then they’ll be all like, “Man, what if the smart people stopped creating things because the government keeps bailing the not-so-smart people out? That would totally suck. And what if someone created a magical energy-making machine, but then Al Gore wouldn’t let us use it because its carbon footprint was too big? That would suck as well. Who is John Galt??!” And then finally, everyone will come around to objectivism, and the government will shut its dollar-spewing piehole, and we can all finally get back to the business of making money again! Thank God (except don’t, because according to Rand, he’s not good for business either)!
jaded110 25th-Aug-2009 08:39 pm (UTC)
o.O
schmiss 25th-Aug-2009 08:42 pm (UTC)
Weird timing, as I just finished re-reading Two Girls Fat and Thin. It's a short novel about two women who are drawn together when one wants to interview the other for a piece about a cult leader named "Anna Granite" and her philosophy of Definitism. Besides being a memorable character study it's such a brilliant parody of Rand and Objectivism, especially in its book-within-a-book parodies of The Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged. I wish I could buy copies for people and send it out. So underrated.
flowerings 25th-Aug-2009 09:03 pm (UTC)
Two Girls Fat and Thin is currently on my reading list. I do not remember how it got there, so I'm glad you enjoyed it.
papilio_luna 25th-Aug-2009 08:49 pm (UTC)
What I know about Atlas Shrugged: Despite having been raised by two fervent Objectivists (though really you guys they're not all Randroid caricatures and my parents are actually patently awesome people), I've never read it. And everything I've heard from everyone who has read it is that I made the right decision on that one.
devil_ad_vocate 25th-Aug-2009 10:57 pm (UTC)
I have. You did.
bludstone 25th-Aug-2009 08:50 pm (UTC)
such an overrated book.
aestas 25th-Aug-2009 08:59 pm (UTC)
Kind of love this article.
(no subject) - Anonymous - Expand
mzflux 25th-Aug-2009 09:56 pm (UTC)
70 page speech vomit.
purpleseas 25th-Aug-2009 09:49 pm (UTC)
Has anybody ever had one of Rand's books just show up in their library for no discernible reason? I had a copy of The Fountainhead when I was a teenager, and I don't even know why I had it or where it came from. I was just talking to someone who had the same experience as an adult. What gives, Ghost of Ayn Rand?
sewingrose 26th-Aug-2009 04:52 am (UTC)
I've always attributed it to those moments where you can get books from a cheap place or for free when someone is spring cleaning, and you grab armfuls of whatever looks even slightly interesting, or you remember hearing about somewhere, but god help you where. It's far to vague an experience to remember getting it, and it's a while before smarter and more wise you come across the book and you wonder where it came from because you would never get it voluntarily.

That was kind of rambly, also I liked your ghost book/author theory better.

neonstilettos 25th-Aug-2009 10:08 pm (UTC)
Charlize Theron? Really?

I... don't really see how this book would make a decent movie. Hopefully there's more explosions and less pontificating.
evilgmbethy 25th-Aug-2009 10:24 pm (UTC)
Angelina is a Randroid? Boo, hiss, Angie.

Its major themes are both reactionary and really fucking, like, insultingly stupid.

LOL.

True story: my first boyfriend went to college, discovered Ayn Rand, and bought me a copy of the fucking Fountainhead as if I'd be interested. That relationship was already on the rocks, and I gotta say, the Rand obsession didn't help matters.
mzflux 25th-Aug-2009 10:40 pm (UTC)
Unfortunate, I know. I honestly don't think she understood the meaning behind the book until Pitt must have taken her aside.

I doubt Charlize gets it either.
xenophyle 25th-Aug-2009 11:53 pm (UTC)
I wish Ayn Rand got hit by a South American train.
___closetome 26th-Aug-2009 12:13 am (UTC)
I only came here hoping for charlize picspam. ONTD_p you disappoint me.
lavenderfrost 26th-Aug-2009 12:35 am (UTC)
...yeah. Where's that Ayn Rand rape flow chart again?
mzflux 26th-Aug-2009 12:40 am (UTC)
hellaine 26th-Aug-2009 03:29 am (UTC)
haha uhg i'm a fan of ayn rand's books. i'm not an objectivist or anything like that, i just like them as literary works.

how embaressing for me D:

*slinks back into the corner*
mzflux 26th-Aug-2009 03:42 am (UTC)
I'm guessing you may be in the same boat as Angelina and Charlize. A fan of the fantasy world, not a fan of the highly ego-driven philosophy behind the work.

We all have our guilty pleasures so don't be ashamed.
This page was loaded Aug 18th 2019, 9:11 pm GMT.