preciosa (preciosatt) wrote in ontd_political,

So is socialist the new code?

Reading, Writing, Arithmetic and Race
By: Marjorie Valbrun
Posted: September 8, 2009 at 6:27 AM

Obama's speech on education: The controversy is mostly about race.
The controversy over President Obama’s school speech is mostly about race. And those parents are teaching their kids exactly the wrong thing.

“I don’t want our schools turned over to some socialist movement,” Brett Curtis, a parent in Texas told the New York Times [2] last week. He said he would keep his three children home from school rather than have them listen to President Barack Obama’s speech to the nation’s school children.

Jim Greer, the Republican Party chairman in Florida, said he “was appalled that taxpayer dollars are being used to spread President Obama’s socialist ideology,” according to the Times. And a political commentator on the Rush Limbaugh [5] show compared President Obama to Saddam Hussein and Kim Jong-il, the communist North Korean leader.

For the past few days as news outlets have reported on school districts and principals around the country being inundated with calls and e-mails from angry parents demanding that President Obama’s speech today not be broadcasted to their children, the story line has been that partisan politics was driving the controversy. What has not been as widely discussed, however, is how much the president’s race has also factored in the debate as the underlying force driving the parents’ outrage.

Not only do they oppose a supposed socialist lecturing their children, they also don’t want a black man doing it, even if he is their president.

What’s most irksome about this fake controversy is the level of hypocrisy and intellectual dishonesty being exhibited by the parents protesting President Obama’s alleged attempts to indoctrinate their children using subliminal messages cloaked in socialist ideology.

Among some of the lines from the president’s speech: "Your education will decide nothing less than the future of this country.”

And this: "What you're learning in school today will determine whether we as a nation can meet our greatest challenges in the future,"

Surely such scandalous socialist propaganda cannot be tolerated. Never mind that the suggested lesson plan that was to accompany the speech and was at the heart of the socialist conspiracy was just that, a suggestion. School administrators did not risk losing their jobs or face a trip to the gulag if they decided to use their own lesson plans.

One can’t help but wonder, if it’s socialism that these parents are worried about then why are they taking marching orders from General Rush Limbaugh and the other conservative commanders of the far right? These demigods have exploited the racial fears of irrational, uniformed people and made them captive to group think that posits that white people are losing more and more control over their lives every day because the black man in office is hell-bent on denying them the white privilege that, until his election, was their birthright.

While it’s true that some on the left criticized Republican presidents when they addressed school children in the past—House Democrats accused President George H.W. Bush of playing politics when he gave a nationally televised speech to students at Alice Deal Junior High School in Washington, D.C., in 1991, encouraging them to study hard and avoid drugs—there was no widespread move to take children out of school so they wouldn’t have to listen to President Bush’s speech or to bully school principals and superintendents to not show it. Nor did parents vociferously attack the president.

The groundswell of hate was not anywhere near the level that we are seeing now. Maybe that’s because neither the first President Bush, nor his son, President George W. Bush, who also gave speeches to school children, are black.

One of the most positive aspects of President Obama’s campaign for the presidency was that it inspired millions of young people across the racial spectrum that in turn inspired white, black, Hispanic, Asian and Arab parents of another generation to think differently about race. Young people’s embrace of Obama challenged parents to think outside of their own limited racial prisms and adopt the “race doesn’t matter ideology” of their children. Countless news stories quoted white parents who said they supported Obama at the urging of their children, and what was most telling about these stories was the parents’ surprise and genuine pride about having learned important lessons from their kids.

Today it’s the protesting parents who are teaching their children lessons, though not positive ones. Their lessons are about close-mindedness and not trying to find common ground with those with whom they disagree. They are modeling for their children a lack of respect for the office of the president, at least when there’s a black man in that office. They are teaching their children to distrust authority figures when they disagree with them, and signaling to children that their government, and thus their country, is working against them.

If these parents were sincerely concerned about the best interests of their children, they wouldn’t be worried about the rise of socialism in this country; they’d be worried about the death of optimism. They would not be wasting time spewing ugly, mendacious invective about the president and encouraging an “us” versus “them” mentality in their children; they would be encouraging them to embrace the civility that President Obama has tried mightily to bring to the national discourse, sometimes to his own political detriment.

At the least, the parents would be willing to admit that telling children to stay in school and study hard is a positive and harmless message, even if that message is coming from a black man.

The president’s speech is an opportunity for a national teachable moment for American children at a time when the country is reeling from an economic meltdown and unemployment is at a 26-year high—a perfect time for a lesson on the importance of being educated and skilled, and over the long term, of being marketable and employable.

These misguided parents may insist they’re teaching their children to stand for this country’s highest ideals, but in truth they’re teaching them to stoop to its lowest.

Marjorie Valbrun is a regular contributor to The Root.


I honestly felt like this whole article could have been bolded!
  • Post a new comment


    Comments allowed for members only

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded