turtleyurtle1 (turtleyurtle1) wrote in ontd_political,
turtleyurtle1
turtleyurtle1
ontd_political

AZ panel OKs lowering minimum wage for the under 22 set

Panel OKs lower pay for young workers
By: HOWARD FISCHER
Source


PHOENIX -- Saying younger workers need jobs, a House panel voted Wednesday to allow Arizona companies to pay them less. 
A lot less.
Legislation approved by the House Commerce Committee would set the minimum wage for anyone younger than 22 at 75 percent of what adults are required to be paid. With the state minimum wage at $7.25 an hour, that translates out to $5.44.


The minimum wage for everyone else is pegged to inflation and would increase next January if the Industrial Commission finds that costs have gone up. HB 2639 would track that increase and then cut it by a quarter.

The exception would begin in January and last for three years.

But Rep. Laurin Hendrix, R-Gilbert, who crafted the measure, conceded that Wednesday's vote is legally meaningless for most Arizona businesses.

The federal minimum wage also happens to be $7.25 an hour. The only exception for youth is for those age 19 and less who can be paid $4.25 an hour but only for the first 90 calendar days of employment.

Hendrix said, though, federal laws apply only to businesses which have at least $500,000 worth of gross sales in any year. And any firm which is involved in any way in interstate commerce must comply with the federal wage requirements.
But Hendrix said that still leaves some small companies who could take advantage of the legislation.

Hendrix said the change is designed to benefit younger workers. He said they have a higher unemployment rate than the rest of the workingage population.

But that's not all. Hendrix said once they have jobs even jobs that don't pay the full minimum wage it will "get them in the habit of going to work and developing a work ethic that will be useful to them later in their lives."

The most recent figures breaking down unemployment by age from the U.S. Census Bureau show nearly 19 percent of those 16 through 19 who want work were unemployed in 2008. That's at the time when the overall state jobless rate for the state was 6.1 percent.
The figure for those 20 through 24 was 10.3 percent.

But Rebekah Friend, executive director of the state AFLCIO, said that's no excuse to pay them less.

"If you get up in the morning, you show up at a job, you should be able to make minimum wage,'" she said.

"We're not talking about some exorbitant 'living wage,'" Rebekah said. The current figure, she noted, translates out to just slightly more than $15,000 a year, before taxes.

Friend said this is little more than an effort to undermine the decision by voters in 2006 to create a state minimum wage and require annual increases tied to inflation. Various business groups tried at the time, unsuccessfully, to convince voters not to approve the change. So did Americans for Tax Reform, the national organization founded by Grover Norquist which asks lawmakers to sign pledges that they won't raise taxes.

On Wednesday, Barry Aarons who lobbies for Norquist's group, was the only one to testify in favor of the subminimum wage for those younger than 22.

While the AFLCIO is opposed to any changes in the law, some of the Democrats on the committee said they are willing to consider some variant of what Hendrix wants.
Rep. Olivia Cajero Bedford, D-Tucson, said it's wrong to think that anyone younger than 22 doesn't need to be making at least the minimum wage. She said while some may be students, others may be married and trying to support families.

So what age makes sense to them?

"I'm thinking more along the lines of high school students at 18 or under," said Rep. Chad Campbell, DPhoenix. "That just makes more sense to me as the majority of them are not independently supporting themselves." Anyone older than that, he said, should be earning the same as anyone else. That's also the assessment of Rep. Robert Meza, D-Phoenix.

The legislation has another problem: It seeks to partially overturn what voters approved in 2006. While the Arizona Constitution allows alterations to initiatives, that can be done only by a supermajority vote and only if the change "furthers the purpose" of the initiative. Friend said this does not do that, saying her organization will sue.
Hendrix does have a backup plan. He convinced committee members to also approve HCR 2043 which would send the question to voters in November.

Both measures now go to the full House.

2008 Arizona unemployment rates
Age group / jobless rate
Overall average / 6.1%
16-19 / 18.8%
20-24 / 10.3%
25-44 / 5.2%
45-54 / 4.3%
55-64 / 4.3%
65-74 / 4.8%
75 and older / 5.1%
-- Source: U.S. Census Bureau
 
 



I hate Arizona. I'm moving after I graduate, but these are my friends who will end up being screwed over (and me as well...I'm starting to think I should work as a babysitter instead of picking up a regular part time job. And I'm selling all my stuff/books for college money.) Anyways, posted because I can't possibly let the "Dog saves the day" story hog up all the Arizona news.

ETA: Guys this is coming at the EXACT same time they're rising (or going to rise) State College Tuition costs.

Proposed annual undergraduate tuition and fees for Arizona residents:

• UA: $8,972, a 31 percent increase

• ASU: $6,940, a 13 percent increase*

• NAU: $6,517, a 6 percent increase**

Proposed annual undergraduate tuition and fees for out-of-state residents:

• UA: $24,931, a 12 percent increase

• ASU: $20,590, a 5 percent increase

• NAU: $17,228, a 4 percent increase**

 

Other Source.
Tags: arizona
Subscribe

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Comments allowed for members only

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 142 comments
Previous
← Ctrl ← Alt
Next
Ctrl → Alt →
Previous
← Ctrl ← Alt
Next
Ctrl → Alt →