James (synesis) wrote in ontd_political,

Judith Butler refuses award at Berlin Pride; cites 'racist complicity'.

Gay pride heroine says march too superficial and commercial
Published: 20 Jun 10 12:21 CET

A philosopher and gender theorist rejected a prize for civil courage at Christopher Street Day parade in Berlin on
Judith Butler, a respected American leftist feminist intellectual who teaches at Berkeley was honoured at the parade, but used her moment in front of the microphone to reject the prize and criticise the march.

Renate Künast, head of the Green Party, first praised Butler for her work before the 54-year-old professor took to the stage at the Brandenburg Gate.

But rather than accepting the prize, she rejected it, saying the parade had become too commercial, and was ignoring the problems of racism and the double discrimination suffered by homosexual or transsexual migrants.

Reading in German from a paper, she said an alternative Christopher Street Day, which is organised in the Kreuzberg area of the city and due to be held next Saturday, was much more effective at tackling such questions.

Around 600,000 people are estimated to have attended the parade which included around 50 trucks and groups of costumed marchers and dancers.


Judith Butler Turns Down Civil Courage Award from Berlin Pride: 'I Must Distance Myself from This Racist Complicity'
Judith Butler, 'I Must Distance Myself from
This Racist Complicity,' 19 June 2010

As Berlin Queer and Trans Activists of Colour and Allies we welcome Judith Butler's decision to turn down the Zivilcourage Prize awarded by Berlin Pride. We are delighted that a renowned theorist has used her celebrity status to honour queer of colour critiques against racism, war, borders, police violence and apartheid. We especially value her bravery in openly critiquing and scandalising the organisers' closeness to homonationalist organisations. Her courageous speech is a testimony to her openness for new ideas and her readiness to engage with our long activist and academic work, which all too often happens under conditions of isolation, precariousness, appropriation and instrumentalisation.

Sadly this is happening once again, for the people of colour organisations who according to Butler should have deserved the award more than her are not mentioned once in the press reports to date. Butler offered the prize to GLADT (www.gladt.de), LesMigraS (www.lesmigras.de), SUSPECT and ReachOut (www.reachoutberlin.de), yet the one political space mentioned in the reports is the Transgenial Christopher Street Day, a white-dominated alternative Pride event. Instead of racism, the press focuses on a simple critique of commercialisation. This even though Butler herself was quite clear: 'I must distance myself from complicity with racism, including anti-Muslim racism.' She notes that not just homosexuals, but also 'bi, trans and queer people can be used by those who want to wage war.'

The CSD, via Renate Künast of the Green Party (who appeared to have difficulties pronouncing the award winner's name and grasping basic aspects of her writings) introduced Butler as a determined critic. Five minutes later, the same critical determination caused the faces of presenters to drop. Rather than engage with the speech in any way, Jan Salloch and Ole Lehmann could think of nothing better than blanketly refuse any charge of racism and attack the ca. 50 queers of colour and allies who had come out in Butler's support: 'You can scream all you like. You are not the majority. That's enough.' The finale was an imperialist fantasy matched by the backdrop of the Brandenburger Tor: 'Pride will just continue in its programme. . . . No matter what. . . . Worldwide and here in Berlin. . . . This is how it's always been and will always be.'

In the past years, racism has indeed been the red thread of international Pride events, from Toronto to Berlin, as well as of the wider gay landscape (see queer of colour theorists Jasbir Puar and Amit Rai's early critique of this in their 2002 article 'Monster, Terrorist, Fag'). In 2008, the Berlin Pride motto was 'Hass du was dagegen?', which might translate as 'You go' a problem or wha'?'. Homophobia and Transphobia are redefined as the problems of youth of colour who apparently don't speak proper German, whose Germanness is always questioned, and who simply don't belong. 2008 is also the year that the hate crimes discourse enters more significantly into German sexual politics. Its rapid assimilation was aided by the fact that the hatefully criminal homophobe was already known: migrants, who are already criminalised, and are incarcerated and even deported with ever growing ease. This moral panic is made respectable by dubious media practices and so-called scientific studies where every case of violence that can be connected to a gay, bi or trans person (no matter if the apparent perpetrator is white or of colour, and no matter if the basis is homophobia, transphobia or a traffic altercation) is circulated as the latest proof of what we all know already -- that queers, especially white men it seems, are worst off of all, and that 'the homophobic migrants' are the main cause for this. This increasingly accepted truth is by no small measure the fruit of the work of homonationalist organizations like the Lesbian and Gay Federation Germany and the gay helpline Maneo, whose close collaboration with Pride ultimately caused Butler to reject the award. This work largely consists in media campaigns that repeatedly represent migrants as 'archaic', 'patriarchal', 'homophobic', violent, and unassimilable. Nevertheless, one of these organizations now ironically receives public funding in order to 'protect' people of colour from racism. The 'Rainbow Protection Circle against Racism and Homophobia' in the gaybourhood Schöneberg was spontaneously greeted by the district mayor with an increase in police patrols. As anti-racists, we sadly know what more police (LGBT or not) mean in an area where many people of colour also live -- especially at times of 'war on terror' and 'security, order and cleanliness.'

It is this tendency of white gay politics, to replace a politics of solidarity, coalitions and radical transformation with one of criminalization, militarization and border enforcement, which Butler scandalizes, also in response to the critiques and writings of queers of colour. Unlike most white queers, she has stuck out her own neck for this. For us, this was a very courageous decision indeed.

Yeliz Çelik, Sanchita Basu, Lucy Chebout, Lisa Thaler, Jin Haritaworn, Jen Petzen, Aykan Safoğlu and Cengiz Barskanmaz of SUSPECT

20 June 2010

SUSPECT is a new group of queer and trans migrants, Black people, people of colour, and allies. Our aim is to monitor the effects of hate crimes debates and to build communities which are free from violence in all its interpersonal and institutional forms. Click here to read the German version of the statement "Judith Butler lehnt Berlin CSD Zivilcouragepreis ab!" See, also, Jin Haritaworn and Jennifer Petzen, "Invented Traditions, New Intimate Publics: Tracing the German 'Muslim Homophobia' Discourse" (forthcoming in Chris Flood and Stephen Hutchings, eds., Islam in its International Context: Comparative Perspectives, Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Press, 2010); and Georg Klauda, "With Islamophobia against Homophobia?" (MRZine, 12 November 2007).

Source 2

Judith Butler continues to be fantastic. But there is a legitimate issue with the mainstream reporting of this incident -- especially that Butler's refusal is glossed as a reaction to the superficiality and commercialism of Pride, whereas that in itself had really very little to do with her very specific objections to mainstream LGBT culture's inability to deal with people of colour.
Tags: lgbtq / gender & sexual minorities, race / racism

  • Post a new comment


    Comments allowed for members only

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded