calybe (calybe) wrote in ontd_political,

  • Mood:
  • Music:

Violence in Indian Kashmir: A cyclical problem

BEARING the stiffening corpse of Anees Ganai, a 17-year-old boy, thousands of Kashmiri men marched on Srinagar’s gaudy, 15th-century main mosque on August 3rd. “Anees! Your blood will start a revolution!” they chanted, adding the refrain of Kashmiris, “Azadi!”, “Freedom!” During two months of violent protests in Indian-controlled Kashmir the mosque had been barred to stop crowds gathering. The killing of around 45 people in that time—including 29 in the past week—most shot by police, suggests that the policy failed. As the mob surged, the police drew back.

Even by its turbulent standards, the Indian-held portion of Kashmir is in chaos. Each day, defying curfews, crowds in Srinagar and several outlying districts gather to pelt stones at police. A paramilitary bunker near the line dividing Indian from Pakistani Kashmir was ransacked this week, and a police station torched. The local economy is choked, as so often in two decades of insurgency and protests. The road to Srinagar is closed and supplies of blood, medicine and baby milk are short.

This is becoming seasonal. Since 2008, when a row over land given to Hindu pilgrims sparked the biggest anti-India demonstrations in two decades, Kashmir has seen annual summer unrest. Last year’s was provoked by the killing of a woman and a girl—gang-raped and murdered by the police[1], said locals, accidentally drowned, said the government. This year’s was sparked by the death of another youth, Tufail Ahmed Mattoo, brained by a tear-gas canister on his way from class.

The protests may peter out. India’s central government has sent an extra 30,000 troops to reinforce its armies in Kashmir. This week the state’s chief minister, Omar Abdullah, visited Delhi to beg for more. And with Kashmir’s apple harvest fast approaching, its farmers, who produce 60% of India’s apples, will need to get their crop to market. But if Kashmiris choose to put down their stones, it may not be for long.

What could break the cycle? The government sees the answer in better local services and more jobs. But it would, having long denied the great extent to which Kashmiris want rid of India. While the insurgency raged, backed by Pakistan, the government could blame its neighbour. But as fighting eased and protests rose, blaming Pakistan got much harder. Kashmiri separatist aspirations are the heart of the problem, as Mr Abdullah hinted in Delhi, by calling for a political solution to it.

Short of separation, which would be impossible even if a third of Kashmir were not in Pakistan, it is hard to know what could satisfy Kashmiris. A few obvious things would help. India could stop its soldiers shooting protesters. It could repeal the draconian powers its forces enjoy and move garrisons from town centres. These measures have been discussed, yet nothing is done: because of opposition from security forces, the usual official Indian sloth and a (more forgivable) reluctance to trust that the proxy war with Pakistan is over.

The wretched state of Kashmir serves as a pretext for Pakistani hostility to India. This makes war more likely and incites Islamist militants. Hence Barack Obama’s proposal, on the presidential campaign trail, to appoint a special envoy to Kashmir. And hence David Miliband, Britain’s then foreign minister, suggesting a connection last year between terrorism in India and its occupation of Kashmir. India responded by expressing strong displeasure to both.

That may, subconsciously perhaps, have encouraged David Cameron, Britain’s prime minister, to suggest that some in Pakistan export terrorism, and sometimes help Afghanistan’s Taliban. He was right. Yet this has riled Pakistan no end. Urging Mr Cameron to show more balance, Pakistan’s prime minister, Yusuf Raza Gilani, naturally referred him to the ongoing misery in Indian-occupied Kashmir.

Source: The Economist

[1] The case they were talking about is known in Kashmir as the Shopian Tragedy (taken from the time it was still under investigation - the case has as of yet still not been resolved): "...Shopian where two young women were gang raped. At first denying any kind of foul play the government termed it as a simple case of drowning, but just to soothe the rising emotions a judicial committee was announced. The rape being brazenly denied by the government, setting up of a committee was not received well by the people since even the first step of registering an FIR was not done by the police for more than a week after the incident. A noted Indian news channel in order to validate the credibility of oblivious policy makers went on to say that “the sex was consensual” and that both the women died of the “Excitement”. The pregnant lady had died from a ruptured uterus and the young girl suffered haemorrhage due to disembowelment. Apart from the marks on their bodies due to the brutal torture and beating these are only some of the gruesome, gory details that the medical report has revealed. The rape according to the medical investigations goes on a little beyond the estimated time of death. Those women were raped even after they became corpses." [Source: Greater Kashmir]

OP: I really dislike the Abdullah family for all the non-chalance they show to what their own people want and how they pander to those who can personally benefit themselves. Sending in more troops is definitely not the solution - it will only serve to frustrate an already irate and oppressed population. The fact that they refuse to even allow peaceful protests from occurring is just ridiculous.
Tags: asia, fuck the police, human rights, india, pakistan, police, police brutality, rape

  • Post a new comment


    Comments allowed for members only

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded