Fueled by granola (fishnet_hamster) wrote in ontd_political,
Fueled by granola

Why C-SPAN can never get cameras on the House floor


Seizing on Republicans' calls for more transparency in the health-care debate, C-SPAN in November asked incoming Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) if it could bring cameras onto the House floor. The response has just come back: Sorry, but no.

"I believe the American people -- and the dignity and decorum of the United States House of Representatives -- are best served by the current system of televised proceedings provided by the House Recording Studio," Boehner wrote to C-SPAN Chairman Brian Lamb.

C-SPAN has been making similar requests since 1994. It seems unlikely to succeed anytime soon. Fighting over camera angles goes back to 1984.

C-SPAN broadcasts the video feed from the House, but it doesn't get to bring in its own camera equipment, which means it has no control over what is shown.

In 1984, members of the Conservative Opportunity Society, a group of aggressive young House Republicans led by Rep. Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.), had begun using C-SPAN-televised floor speeches to get their message out to the public. What the public didn't know was that most of the time, no one was actually listening -- the speeches were given when legislative business was over and the bulk of members had gone home. In accordance with House rules, the camera showed only the person speaking, and not the empty chamber he or she was speaking to.

Annoyed by a speech in which Gingrich accused several apparently silent (in reality, completely absent) Democrats of being "blind to communism," Speaker Tip O'Neill (D-Mass.) decided to take revenge. Without warning Republicans, he ordered the cameras to pan the chamber while a member of the COS was speaking, to show the empty room. Angry Republicans labeled the maneuver "camscam."

The ensuing fight only helped make Gingrich famous, and the wide-angle shots stayed until 1994, when Republicans and Democrats agreed to go back to close-ups only in the hopes of making Congress look more dignified. That same year, trying to compete with other networks for viewers, C-SPAN asked if it could bring in its own cameras. Incoming Speaker Gingrich declined. Nancy Pelosi followed suit in 2006.

Boehner is allowing some expanded television access. He's willing to let TV reporters into the chamber for special events and high-profile debates on a case-by-case basis, and he will let them have "stakeout" locations in heavily-trafficked parts of the Capitol. But he drew the line at C-SPAN's request.

"We're disappointed to learn that despite 32 years of experience with televising its sessions and in an age of ubiquitous cameras in political life, the House of Representatives has chosen not to allow C-SPAN's cameras into its chamber to cover its sessions," C-SPAN said in response to
Boehner's refusal.

"We continue to feel that the public is best served by seeing a more complete picture of the legislative process than what's delivered by Congressionally-controlled cameras and will continue to work with Speaker Boehner and other leaders in the House in hope of one day gaining access on behalf of the media."

But the Speaker is just following in a long tradition. Defiant speeches given to abandoned rooms are still a popular hobby for lawmakers. And the cameras stay put.

I did not know that about C-Span, that they only broadcast the footage from the House. Huh. You really do learn something new everyday, or at least I did.
Tags: congress, john boehner, media

  • Post a new comment


    Comments allowed for members only

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded