sesmo (sesmo) wrote in ontd_political,

Cherokee Freed Men Citizenship restored

A positive story, and the conclusion to the saga previously posted.

Black Cherokees in Kansas City were ecstatic Tuesday after learning that the tribal citizenship they’d been fighting years for has been restored.

Their citizenship is regained through an agreement made in federal court between the Cherokee Nation and black Cherokees known as freedmen, an attorney said Tuesday.

“This is not temporary, where the Cherokee Nation gives freedmen citizenship until after the election and then tries to change it,” said Jon Velie, who was in court Tuesday on behalf of the freedmen.

The agreement came during a hearing in federal court in Washington. The parties have until this morning to submit a written agreement to the judge.

The agreement gives 2,800 freedmen all the benefits available to the Cherokee tribe, including tribal voting rights. And it extends the voting period for the upcoming election for principal chief to Oct. 8. Before Tuesday, that election was to take place this week.

“We have been vindicated,” said Willadine Johnson, whose ancestors, like other freedmen, were held as slaves by Cherokees. After the Civil War, Cherokees signed a treaty freeing its slaves and granting them full Cherokee citizenship.

“This is the way it always should have been,” Johnson said. “You can’t take my citizenship from me.”

In 2007 the nation stripped freedmen of their citizenship and suffrage rights, saying bloodline determined citizenship.

Read more:

I also thought the comment @ McClatchy was particularly insightful, and it's this:

From Commenter JohnnyMorale:

The Cherokee government was being particularly evil in this regard, because the "Freedmen" overwhelmingly have Cherokee Blood as well.

They were only excluded, because the rules defining such a thing were laid down by rolls taken over a century ago required documentation that someone was indeed part Cherokee.

Naturally being former slaves they did NOT have those documents, just as virtually NO Black person has documents to prove they have White ancestors despite recent genetic studies that determined the typical Black American is ON AVERAGE 20% White.

That is probably the reason why the agreement giving them those rights was written as an IRREVOCABLE CLAUSE.

In attempting to overturn them, the governing board clearly did NOT care, and in trying to do so acted unconstitutionally.

They had NO power to overturn an IRREVOCABLE amendment.
Tags: indigenous people, race / racism
  • Post a new comment


    Comments allowed for members only

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded