George W. Bush and 8 members of his Administration are now WANTED WAR CRIMINALS.4:51 pm - 05/14/2012
KUALA LUMPUR — It’s official -- George W. Bush is a war criminal.
In what is the first ever conviction of its kind anywhere in the world, the former president of the United States and seven key members of his administration were found guilty of war crimes on Friday.
Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and their legal advisors, Alberto Gonzales, David Addington, William Haynes, Jay Bybee, and John Yoo, were tried in absentia in Malaysia.
The trial held in Kuala Lumpur heard harrowing witness accounts from victims of torture who suffered at the hands of U.S. soldiers and contractors in Iraq and Afghanistan.
They included testimony from British citizen Moazzam Begg, an ex-Guantanamo detainee and Iraqi woman Jameelah Abbas Hameedi, who was tortured in the notorious Abu Ghraib prison.
At the end of the week-long hearing, the five-panel tribunal unanimously delivered guilty verdicts against Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, and their key legal advisors, who were all convicted as war criminals for torture and cruel, inhumane, and degrading treatment.
Full transcripts of the charges, witness statements, and other relevant material will now be sent to the chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, as well as the United Nations and the UN Security Council.
The Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission is also asking that the names of Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Gonzales, Yoo, Bybee, Addington, and Haynes be entered and included in the Commission’s Register of War Criminals for public record.
The tribunal is the initiative of retired Malaysian prime minister Mahathir Mohamad, who staunchly opposed the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq in 2003.
He sat through the entire hearing as it took personal statements and testimonies of three witnesses, namely Abbas Abid, Moazzam Begg, and Jameelah Hameedi. The tribunal also heard two other statutory declarations by Iraqi citizen Ali Shalal and Rahul Ahmed, another British citizen.
After the five senior judges delivered the guilty verdicts, Mahathir said, “Powerful countries are getting away with murder.”
War crimes expert and lawyer Francis Boyle, a professor of international law at the University of Illinois College of Law in the U.S., was part of the prosecution team.
After the case concluded, he said, “This is the first conviction of these people anywhere in the world.”
While some regard the hearing as purely symbolic, human rights activist Boyle said he was hopeful that Bush and company could soon find themselves facing similar trials elsewhere in the world.
“We tried three times to get Bush in Canada but were thwarted by the Canadian government; then we scared Bush out of going to Switzerland. The Spanish attempt failed because of the government there and the same happened in Germany.”
Boyle then referenced the Nuremberg Charter, which was used as the format for the tribunal, when asked about the credibility of the initiative in Malaysia. He stated, “Leaders, organizers, instigators, and accomplices participating in the formulation or execution of a common plan or conspiracy to commit war crimes are responsible for all acts performed by any person in execution of such a plan.”
The U.S. is subject to customary international law and to the Principles of the Nuremberg Charter said Boyle, who also stated that the week-long trial was “almost certainly” being monitored closely by both Pentagon and White House officials.
Professor Gurdial Singh Nijar, who headed the prosecution, said, “The tribunal was very careful to adhere scrupulously to the regulations drawn up by the Nuremberg courts and the International Criminal Courts.”
He added that he was optimistic that the tribunal would be followed up elsewhere in the world where “countries have a duty to try war criminals” and he cited the case of former Chilean dictator Augustine Pinochet, who was arrested in Britain to be extradited to Spain on charges of war crimes. “Pinochet was only eight years out of his presidency when that happened.”
The Pinochet case was the first time that several European judges applied the principle of universal jurisdiction, declaring themselves competent to judge crimes committed by former heads of state, despite local amnesty laws.
Throughout the week the tribunal was packed with legal experts and law students as witnesses gave testimony and then cross examination was conducted by the defense, led by lawyer Jason Kay Kit Leon.
The court heard how
· Abbas Abid, a 48-year-old engineer from Fallujah in Iraq, had his fingernails removed by pliers.
· Ali Shalal was attached with bare electrical wires and electrocuted and hung from a wall.
· Moazzam Begg was beaten, hooded, and put in solitary confinement.
· Jameelah Hameedi was stripped and humiliated, and was used as a human shield whilst being transported by helicopter.
The witnesses also detailed how they still have residual injuries today.
Moazzam Begg, now working as a director for the London-based human rights group Cageprisoners, said he was delighted with the verdict, but added, “When people talk about Nuremberg, you have to remember those tried were all prosecuted after the war.
“Right now Guantanamo is still open, people are still being held there and are still being tortured there.”
In response to questions about the difference between the Bush and Obama administrations, he stated, “If President Bush was the president of extra-judicial torture, then U.S. President Barack Obama is the president of extra-judicial killing through drone strikes. Our work has only just begun.”
The prosecution case rested on proving how the decision-makers at the highest level, President Bush, Vice President Cheney, Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld, aided and abetted by the lawyers and the other commanders and CIA officials -- all acted in concert. Torture was systematically applied and became an accepted norm.
According to the prosecution, the testimony of all the witnesses exposed a sustained perpetration of brutal, barbaric, cruel, and dehumanizing course of conduct against them.
These acts of crimes were applied cumulatively to inflict the worst possible pain and suffering, said lawyers.
The president of the tribunal, Tan Sri Dato Lamin bin Haji Mohd Yunus Lamin, found that the prosecution had established beyond a “reasonable doubt that the accused persons, former President George W. Bush and his co-conspirators engaged in a web of instructions, memos, directives, legal advice and action that established a common plan and purpose, joint enterprise and/or conspiracy to commit the crimes of torture and war crimes, including and not limited to a common plan and purpose to commit the following crimes in relation to the “War on Terror” and the wars launched by the U.S. and others in Afghanistan and Iraq.”
President Lamin told a packed courtroom, “As a tribunal of conscience, the tribunal is fully aware that its verdict is merely declaratory in nature. The tribunal has no power of enforcement, no power to impose any custodial sentence on any one or more of the 8 convicted persons. What we can do, under Article 31 of Chapter VI of Part 2 of the Charter is to recommend to the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission to submit this finding of conviction by the tribunal, together with a record of these proceedings, to the chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, as well as the United Nations and the Security Council.
“The Tribunal also recommends to the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission that the names of all the 8 convicted persons be entered and included in the Commission’s Register of War Criminals and be publicized accordingly.
“The Tribunal recommends to the War Crimes Commission to give the widest international publicity to this conviction and grant of reparations, as these are universal crimes for which there is a responsibility upon nations to institute prosecutions if any of these Accused persons may enter their jurisdictions”.